9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Variability and Standardization of Quantitative Imaging : Monoparametric to Multiparametric Quantification, Radiomics, and Artificial Intelligence

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Radiological images have been assessed qualitatively in most clinical settings by the expert eyes of radiologists and other clinicians. On the other hand, quantification of radiological images has the potential to detect early disease that may be difficult to detect with human eyes, complement or replace biopsy, and provide clear differentiation of disease stage. Further, objective assessment by quantification is a prerequisite of personalized/precision medicine. This review article aims to summarize and discuss how the variability of quantitative values derived from radiological images are induced by a number of factors and how these variabilities are mitigated and standardization of the quantitative values are achieved. We discuss the variabilities of specific biomarkers derived from magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography, and focus on diffusion-weighted imaging, relaxometry, lung density evaluation, and computer-aided computed tomography volumetry. We also review the sources of variability and current efforts of standardization of the rapidly evolving techniques, which include radiomics and artificial intelligence.

          Related collections

          Most cited references191

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Modified Spin-Echo Method for Measuring Nuclear Relaxation Times

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Harmonization of cortical thickness measurements across scanners and sites

            With the proliferation of multi-site neuroimaging studies, there is a greater need for handling non-biological variance introduced by differences in MRI scanners and acquisition protocols. Such unwanted sources of variation, which we refer to as “scanner effects”, can hinder the detection of imaging features associated with clinical covariates of interest and cause spurious findings. In this paper, we investigate scanner effects in two large multi-site studies on cortical thickness measurements across a total of 11 scanners. We propose a set of tools for visualizing and identifying scanner effects that are generalizable to other modalities. We then propose to use ComBat, a technique adopted from the genomics literature and recently applied to diffusion tensor imaging data, to combine and harmonize cortical thickness values across scanners. We show that ComBat removes unwanted sources of scan variability while simultaneously increasing the power and reproducibility of subsequent statistical analyses. We also show that ComBat is useful for combining imaging data with the goal of studying life-span trajectories in the brain.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting

              Summary Magnetic Resonance (MR) is an exceptionally powerful and versatile measurement technique. The basic structure of an MR experiment has remained nearly constant for almost 50 years. Here we introduce a novel paradigm, Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting (MRF) that permits the non-invasive quantification of multiple important properties of a material or tissue simultaneously through a new approach to data acquisition, post-processing and visualization. MRF provides a new mechanism to quantitatively detect and analyze complex changes that can represent physical alterations of a substance or early indicators of disease. MRF can also be used to specifically identify the presence of a target material or tissue, which will increase the sensitivity, specificity, and speed of an MR study, and potentially lead to new diagnostic testing methodologies. When paired with an appropriate pattern recognition algorithm, MRF inherently suppresses measurement errors and thus can improve accuracy compared to previous approaches.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Invest Radiol
                Invest Radiol
                RLI
                Investigative Radiology
                Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
                0020-9996
                1536-0210
                September 2020
                24 March 2020
                : 55
                : 9
                : 601-616
                Affiliations
                From the []Department of Radiology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo
                []Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo
                []Department of Radiology, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan.
                Author notes
                [*]Correspondence to: Akifumi Hagiwara, MD, PhD, Department of Radiology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, 1-2-1, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan, 113-8421. E-mail: a-hagiwara@ 123456juntendo.ac.jp .
                Article
                RLI50510 00011
                10.1097/RLI.0000000000000666
                7413678
                32209816
                9cb13f87-1e0f-4483-9c24-1c5f793a73ff
                Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.

                History
                : 20 January 2020
                : 28 January 2020
                Categories
                Review Article
                Custom metadata
                TRUE

                quantitative imaging,quantitative imaging biomarker alliance,standardization,diffusion-weighted imaging,synthetic mri,magnetic resonance fingerprinting,chest ct,radiomics,artificial intelligence,deep learning

                Comments

                Comment on this article