8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Diagnosis and Localization of Pheochromocytoma

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references13

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Biochemical diagnosis of pheochromocytoma: how to distinguish true- from false-positive test results.

          Measurements of plasma normetanephrine and metanephrine provide a highly sensitive test for diagnosis of pheochromocytoma, but false-positive results remain a problem. We therefore assessed medication-associated false-positive results and use of supplementary tests, including plasma normetanephrine responses to clonidine, to distinguish true- from false-positive results. The study included 208 patients with pheochromocytoma and 648 patients in whom pheochromocytoma was excluded. Clonidine-suppression tests were carried out in 48 patients with and 49 patients without the tumor. Tricyclic antidepressants and phenoxybenzamine accounted for 41% of false-positive elevations of plasma normetanephrine and 44-45% those of plasma and urinary norepinephrine. High plasma normetanephrine to norepinephrine or metanephrine to epinephrine ratios were strongly predictive of pheochromocytoma. Lack of decrease and elevated plasma levels of norepinephrine or normetanephrine after clonidine also confirmed pheochromocytoma with high specificity. However, 16 of 48 patients with pheochromocytoma had normal levels or decreases of norepinephrine after clonidine. In contrast, plasma normetanephrine remained elevated in all but 2 patients, indicating more reliable diagnosis using normetanephrine than norepinephrine responses to clonidine. Thus, in patients with suspected pheochromocytoma and positive biochemical results, false-positive elevations due to medications should first be eliminated. Patterns of biochemical test results and responses of plasma normetanephrine to clonidine can then help distinguish true- from false-positive results.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Biochemical Diagnosis of Pheochromocytoma

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Pheochromocytomas: imaging with 2-[fluorine-18]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose PET.

              To assess the sensitivity of positron emission tomography (PET) with 2-[fluorine-18]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) in pheochromocytomas and, secondarily, to compare images obtained with FDG PET to those obtained with metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) scintigraphy. Twenty-nine patients with one or more known or subsequently proved pheochromocytomas underwent FDG PET (35 scans) and MIBG scintigraphy (35 scans). Tumor uptake of FDG was quantified on positive PET scans. Tumor uptake of FDG was detected in 22 of 29 patients. Most benign (seven of 12 patients) and most malignant (15 of 17 patients) pheochromocytomas and their metastases avidly concentrated FDG. In four patients whose pheochromocytomas failed to accumulate MIBG, uptake of FDG in the tumors was intense. For the majority of the 16 patients whose tumors concentrated both agents, however, ratings for MIBG images compared to FDG PET images for delineation of the tumor in comparison to background and normal organ accumulation were superior for nine patients (56%) and as good or better for 14 (88%). Most pheochromocytomas accumulate FDG. Uptake is found in a greater percentage of malignant than benign pheochromocytomas. FDG PET is especially useful in defining the distribution of those pheochromocytomas that fail to concentrate MIBG.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Hypertension
                Hypertension
                Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
                0194-911X
                1524-4563
                May 2004
                May 2004
                : 43
                : 5
                : 907-910
                Affiliations
                [1 ]From the Clinical Neurocardiology Section (D.S.G., G.E.), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md; the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine (J.A.F., G.W.), Baltimore, Md; and Pediatric and Reproductive Endocrinology Branch (K.P.), National Institute of Child Health and Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md.
                Article
                10.1161/01.HYP.0000125014.56023.b8
                15023935
                ba0e216d-dda5-4337-8b59-e81e26619df9
                © 2004
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article