0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Parasites of the Reintroduced Iberian Lynx ( Lynx pardinus) and Sympatric Mesocarnivores in Extremadura, Spain

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The Iberian lynx ( Lynx pardinus) is one of the most endangered felid species in the world. Conservation efforts have increased its population size and distribution and reinforced their genetic diversity through captive breeding and reintroduction programmes. Among several threats that the Iberian lynx faces, infectious and parasitic diseases have underlined effects on the health of their newly reintroduced populations, being essential to identify the primary sources of these agents and assess populations health status. To achieve this, 79 fresh faecal samples from Iberian lynx and sympatric mesocarnivores were collected in the reintroduction area of Extremadura, Spain. Samples were submitted to copromicroscopic analyses to assess parasite diversity, prevalence, and mean intensity of parasite burden. Overall, 19 (24.1%, ±15.1–35.0) samples were positive for at least one enteric parasite species. Parasite diversity and prevalence were higher in the Iberian lynx (43.8%) compared with the others mesocarnivores under study (e.g., the red fox Vulpes vulpes and the Egyptian mongoose Herpestes ichneumon). Ancylostomatidae and Toxocara cati were the most prevalent (15.6%) parasites. Obtained results revealed that Iberian lynx role as predator control might have reduced parasite cross-transmission between this felid and mesocarnivores due to their decreasing abundances. Surveillance programs must include regular monitoring of this endangered felid, comprising mesocarnivores, but also domestic/feral and wild cat communities.

          Related collections

          Most cited references53

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Introduced species and their missing parasites.

          Damage caused by introduced species results from the high population densities and large body sizes that they attain in their new location. Escape from the effects of natural enemies is a frequent explanation given for the success of introduced species. Because some parasites can reduce host density and decrease body size, an invader that leaves parasites behind and encounters few new parasites can experience a demographic release and become a pest. To test whether introduced species are less parasitized, we have compared the parasites of exotic species in their native and introduced ranges, using 26 host species of molluscs, crustaceans, fishes, birds, mammals, amphibians and reptiles. Here we report that the number of parasite species found in native populations is twice that found in exotic populations. In addition, introduced populations are less heavily parasitized (in terms of percentage infected) than are native populations. Reduced parasitization of introduced species has several causes, including reduced probability of the introduction of parasites with exotic species (or early extinction after host establishment), absence of other required hosts in the new location, and the host-specific limitations of native parasites adapting to new hosts.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Parasitology meets ecology on its own terms: Margolis et al. revisited.

            We consider 27 population and community terms used frequently by parasitologists when describing the ecology of parasites. We provide suggestions for various terms in an attempt to foster consistent use and to make terms used in parasite ecology easier to interpret for those who study free-living organisms. We suggest strongly that authors, whether they agree or disagree with us, provide complete and unambiguous definitions for all parameters of their studies.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Is a healthy ecosystem one that is rich in parasites?

              Historically, the role of parasites in ecosystem functioning has been considered trivial because a cursory examination reveals that their relative biomass is low compared with that of other trophic groups. However there is increasing evidence that parasite-mediated effects could be significant: they shape host population dynamics, alter interspecific competition, influence energy flow and appear to be important drivers of biodiversity. Indeed they influence a range of ecosystem functions and have a major effect on the structure of some food webs. Here, we consider the bottom-up and top-down processes of how parasitism influences ecosystem functioning and show that there is evidence that parasites are important for biodiversity and production; thus, we consider a healthy system to be one that is rich in parasite species.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Academic Editor
                Journal
                Pathogens
                Pathogens
                pathogens
                Pathogens
                MDPI
                2076-0817
                01 March 2021
                March 2021
                : 10
                : 3
                : 274
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Biology and CESAM, University of Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal; rita.torres@ 123456ua.pt (R.T.T.); cfonseca@ 123456ua.pt (C.F.)
                [2 ]CIISA—Centro de Investigação Interdisciplinar em Sanidade Animal, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária, Universidade de Lisboa, Avenida da Universidade Técnica, 1300-477 Lisboa, Portugal; madeiradecarvalho@ 123456fmv.ulisboa.pt
                [3 ]DGMA, Junta de Extremadura Consejería de Medio Ambiente y Rural, Políticas Agrarias y Territorio, Avda. Luis Ramallo S/N, 06800 Mérida, Badajoz, Spain; mariajesus.palacios@ 123456juntaex.es (M.J.P.G.); jorgepmartinez@ 123456gmail.com (J.P.)
                [4 ]Fundación CBD-Hábitat, c/Gustavo Fernández Balbuena 2, Entreplanta, Oficina A, 28002 Madrid, Spain; samuel.pla@ 123456cbd-habitat.com (S.P.); carmen.rueda91@ 123456gmail.com (C.R.); f.silvestre@ 123456cbd-habitat.com (F.S.)
                [5 ]Tragsatec, Gerencia de Calidad, Evaluación Ambiental y Biodiversidad, C/Julián Camarillo 6B, Planta 4, 28037 Madrid, Spain; jcnarjona@ 123456yahoo.com
                [6 ]FOTEX-Dirección General de Medio Ambiente, Junta de Extremadura, Avda. Luis Ramallo s/n, 06800 Mérida, Badajoz, Spain; nuriavcoll@ 123456hotmail.com
                [7 ]Parasitology Reference and Research Laboratory, Spanish National Centre for Microbiology, Majadahonda, 28220 Madrid, Spain; dacarmena@ 123456isciii.es
                [8 ]Parasitology Area, Animal Health Department, University of Extremadura, Avda. de la Universidad s/n, 10003 Cáceres, Spain; mahabela@ 123456unex.es
                [9 ]SALUVET, Animal Health Department, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, Complutense University of Madrid, Ciudad Universitaria s/n, 28040 Madrid, Spain; r.calero@ 123456ucm.es
                [10 ]Asistencia Técnica de la Dirección General del Medio Natural y Desarrollo Sostenible de la Junta de Comunidades de Castilla-La Mancha, Plaza del Cardenal Siliceo s/n, 45071 Toledo, Spain
                [11 ]Department of Animal Physiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Complutense University of Madrid, Avda, Ciudad Universitaria s/n, 28040 Madrid, Spain
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence: anamfigueiredo@ 123456ua.pt (A.M.F.); fernanaj@ 123456ucm.es (F.N.)
                [†]

                Both authors contributed equally to this manuscript.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2623-6340
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7548-667X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4570-459X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9470-1315
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4015-8553
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4186-6217
                Article
                pathogens-10-00274
                10.3390/pathogens10030274
                8000845
                33804321
                ba86e547-cd4a-44cc-b950-04507eb55f50
                © 2021 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 31 January 2021
                : 24 February 2021
                Categories
                Article

                iberian lynx,mesocarnivores,parasites,ancylostomatidae,toxocara cati,trichuris sp.

                Comments

                Comment on this article