274
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Flexor Hallucis Longus tendon rupture in RA-patients is associated with MTP 1 damage and pes planus

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          To assess the prevalence of and relation between rupture or tenosynovitis of the Flexor Hallucis Longus (FHL) tendon and range of motion, deformities and joint damage of the forefoot in RA patients with foot complaints.

          Methods

          Thirty RA patients with painful feet were analysed, their feet were examined clinically for the presence of pes planus and range of motion (ROM), radiographs were scored looking for the presence of forefoot damage, and ultrasound examination was performed, examining the presence of tenosyovitis or rupture of the FHL at the level of the medial malleolus. The correlation between the presence or absence of the FHL and ROM, forefoot damage and pes planus was calculated.

          Results

          In 11/60(18%) of the feet, a rupture of the FHL was found. This was associated with a limited motion of the MTP1-joint, measured on the JAM (χ 2 = 10.4, p = 0.034), a higher prevalence of pes planus (χ 2 = 5.77, p = 0.016) and a higher prevalence of erosions proximal at the MTP-1 joint (χ 2 = 12.3, p = 0.016), and joint space narrowing of the MTP1 joint (χ 2 = 12.7, p = 0.013).

          Conclusion

          Rupture of the flexor hallucis longus tendon in RA-patients is associated with limited range of hallux motion, more erosions and joint space narrowing of the MTP-1-joint, as well as with pes planus.

          Related collections

          Most cited references16

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Effects of hydroxychloroquine and sulphasalazine on progression of joint damage in rheumatoid arthritis.

          The effects of hydroxychloroquine and sulphasalazine on progression of joint damage shown by X-rays were compared in a double-blind, randomised trial in 60 patients with rheumatoid arthritis not previously treated with slow-acting antirheumatic drugs. X-rays of the hands and feet at the start and after 24 and 48 weeks of treatment were available for 28 patients treated with hydroxychloroquine and 22 treated with sulphasalazine. Erosions and joint space narrowing were scored by a single observer unaware of treatment. At baseline there were no significant differences in demographic, clinical, or radiographic characteristics between the treatment groups. Patients withdrawn because of lack of effect were included in the analysis. The median number of erosions was lower in the sulphasalazine than the hydroxychloroquine group at 24 weeks of treatment (2.5 vs 10) and the difference was significant at 48 weeks (5 vs 16; p less than 0.02). The difference in median total score of joint damage was significant at 24 weeks (6.5 vs 17; p less than 0.02) and at 48 weeks (8 vs 33; p less than 0.02). The increase in number of erosions and total score was significantly greater in the hydroxychloroquine than the sulphasalazine group, both after 24 weeks and after 48 weeks of treatment.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Interobserver reliability of rheumatologists performing musculoskeletal ultrasonography: results from a EULAR "Train the trainers" course.

            To evaluate the interobserver reliability among 14 experts in musculoskeletal ultrasonography (US) and to determine the overall agreement about the US results compared with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which served as the imaging "gold standard". The clinically dominant joint regions (shoulder, knee, ankle/toe, wrist/finger) of four patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases were ultrasonographically examined by 14 experts. US results were compared with MRI. Overall agreements, sensitivities, specificities, and interobserver reliabilities were assessed. Taking an agreement in US examination of 10 out of 14 experts into account, the overall kappa for all examined joints was 0.76. Calculations for each joint region showed high kappa values for the knee (1), moderate values for the shoulder (0.76) and hand/finger (0.59), and low agreement for ankle/toe joints (0.28). kappa Values for bone lesions, bursitis, and tendon tears were high (kappa = 1). Relatively good agreement for most US findings, compared with MRI, was found for the shoulder (overall agreement 81%, sensitivity 76%, specificity 89%) and knee joint (overall agreement 88%, sensitivity 91%, specificity 88%). Sensitivities were lower for wrist/finger (overall agreement 73%, sensitivity 66%, specificity 88%) and ankle/toe joints (overall agreement 82%, sensitivity 61%, specificity 92%). Interobserver reliabilities, sensitivities, and specificities in comparison with MRI were moderate to good. Further standardisation of US scanning techniques and definitions of different pathological US lesions are necessary to increase the interobserver agreement in musculoskeletal US.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Interobserver reliability in musculoskeletal ultrasonography: results from a "Teach the Teachers" rheumatologist course.

              To assess the interobserver reliability of the main periarticular and intra-articular ultrasonographic pathologies and to establish the principal disagreements on scanning technique and diagnostic criteria between a group of experts in musculoskeletal ultrasonography. The shoulder, wrist/hand, ankle/foot, or knee of 24 patients with rheumatic diseases were evaluated by 23 musculoskeletal ultrasound experts from different European countries randomly assigned to six groups. The participants did not reach consensus on scanning method or diagnostic criteria before the investigation. They were unaware of the patients' clinical and imaging data. The experts from each group undertook a blinded ultrasound examination of the four anatomical regions. The ultrasound investigation included the presence/absence of joint effusion/synovitis, bony cortex abnormalities, tenosynovitis, tendon lesions, bursitis, and power Doppler signal. Afterwards they compared the ultrasound findings and re-examined the patients together while discussing their results. Overall agreements were 91% for joint effusion/synovitis and tendon lesions, 87% for cortical abnormalities, 84% for tenosynovitis, 83.5% for bursitis, and 83% for power Doppler signal; kappa values were good for the wrist/hand and knee (0.61 and 0.60) and fair for the shoulder and ankle/foot (0.50 and 0.54). The principal differences in scanning method and diagnostic criteria between experts were related to dynamic examination, definition of tendon lesions, and pathological v physiological fluid within joints, tendon sheaths, and bursae. Musculoskeletal ultrasound has a moderate to good interobserver reliability. Further consensus on standardisation of scanning technique and diagnostic criteria is necessary to improve musculoskeletal ultrasonography reproducibility.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BMC Musculoskelet Disord
                BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
                BioMed Central
                1471-2474
                2007
                6 November 2007
                : 8
                : 110
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Ziekenhuis Groep Twente, Almelo & Hengelo, The Netherlands
                [2 ]Medisch Spectrum Twente & University Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
                [3 ]Roessingh Research and Development, Enschede, The Netherlands
                Article
                1471-2474-8-110
                10.1186/1471-2474-8-110
                2198913
                17986350
                bad4b808-a6c8-4fef-b92c-91bcad951b35
                Copyright © 2007 Baan et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 1 June 2007
                : 6 November 2007
                Categories
                Research Article

                Orthopedics
                Orthopedics

                Comments

                Comment on this article