9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Is birth history the key to highly educated women's higher breast cancer mortality? A follow-up study of 500,000 women aged 35-54.

      International Journal of Cancer. Journal International du Cancer
      Adult, Breast Neoplasms, epidemiology, mortality, Educational Status, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Maternal Age, Middle Aged, Norway, Parity, Pregnancy, Proportional Hazards Models, Risk Factors

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          A positive relationship has been found between high levels of education and breast cancer mortality. The aim of our study is to determine if the educational gradient in breast cancer mortality persists after adjustment for reproductive history. Register data including the total adult population in Norway were used. A total of 512,353 Norwegian women 35-54 years of age at the Norwegian Census in 1990 were followed with respect to breast cancer deaths until December 31, 2001. The analysis included 2,052 breast cancer deaths in 5.6 million person years. Educational differences in breast cancer mortality were analysed using Cox regression. The age adjusted relative risk of dying from breast cancer for women with >12 years of education compared to women with <10 years was 1.25 (95% confidence limits [CI] = 1.10-1.41). Adjustment for age at first birth with nulliparous as reference category reduced this difference to 1.08 (95% CI = 0.95-1.23). For parous women, age at first birth explained all the educational difference in breast cancer mortality. Among nulliparous women there was a larger positive educational gradient in breast cancer mortality than among parous women (relative risk [RR] = 1.57, 95% CI = 1.15-2.13), indicating that there were differences in other confounders than birth history among the childless. Copyright 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Comments

          Comment on this article