7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Regarding Antimicrobial Use and Stewardship Among Prescribers at Acute-Care Hospitals

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          OBJECTIVE

          To assess antimicrobial prescriber knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) regarding antimicrobial stewardship (AS) and associated barriers to optimal prescribing.

          DESIGN

          Cross-sectional survey.

          SETTING

          Online survey.

          PARTICIPANTS

          A convenience sample of 2,900 US antimicrobial prescribers at 5 acute-care hospitals within a hospital network.

          INTERVENTION

          The following characteristics were assessed with an anonymous, online survey in February 2015: attitudes and practices related to antimicrobial resistance, AS programs, and institutional AS resources; antimicrobial prescribing and AS knowledge; and practices and confidence related to antimicrobial prescribing.

          RESULTS

          In total, 402 respondents completed the survey. Knowledge gaps were identified through case-based questions. Some respondents sometimes selected overly broad therapy for the susceptibilities given (29%) and some “usually” or “always” preferred using the most broad-spectrum empiric antimicrobials possible (32%). Nearly all (99%) reported reviewing antimicrobial appropriateness at 48–72 hours, but only 55% reported “always” doing so. Furthermore, 45% of respondents felt that they had not received adequate training regarding antimicrobial prescribing. Some respondents lacked confidence selecting empiric therapy using antibiograms (30%), interpreting susceptibility results (24%), de-escalating therapy (18%), and determining duration of therapy (31%). Postprescription review and feedback (PPRF) was the most commonly cited AS intervention (79%) with potential to improve patient care.

          CONCLUSIONS

          Barriers to appropriate antimicrobial selection and de-escalation of antimicrobial therapy were identified among front-line prescribers in acute-care hospitals. Prescribers desired more AS-related education and identified PPRF as the most helpful AS intervention to improve patient care. Educational interventions should be preceded by and tailored to local assessment of educational needs.

          Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2018;39:316–322

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          applab
          Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology
          Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol.
          Cambridge University Press (CUP)
          0899-823X
          1559-6834
          March 2018
          February 6 2018
          March 2018
          : 39
          : 03
          : 316-322
          Article
          10.1017/ice.2017.317
          29402339
          bafe5d39-00ff-4aa7-ac39-e63e21cb48c6
          © 2018
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article