23
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Effectiveness of Interventions, Programs and Strategies for Gender-based Violence Prevention in Refugee Populations: An Integrative Review

      research-article
      , , ,
      PLoS Currents
      Public Library of Science

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background: Gender based violence (GBV) remains one of the most serious threats to the health and safety of women and girls worldwide. The problem is even more pronounced in refugee populations where women and girls are at increased risk of violence. In 2015, UNHCR reported the highest number of forcibly displaced people in recorded history. Despite growing need, there have been few rigorous evaluations of interventions aimed at primary GBV prevention and no systematic reviews of GBV prevention efforts specifically focused on refugee populations; reviews to date have primarily examined prevention of conflict related sexual violence, with very limited focus on other forms of GBV such as intimate partner violence

          Methods: This study reviewed the scientific literature addressing strategies for primary prevention of GBV and their effectiveness among refugee populations over the past ten years (2006 to 2015). Narrative content analysis methods were used to extract findings related to prevention activities/programs recommended by the global humanitarian community, such as sociocultural norms change, rebuilding family and community support structures, improving accountability systems, designing effective services and facilities, working with formal and traditional legal systems, monitoring and documenting GBV, and/or engaging men and boys in GBV prevention and response.

          Results: Study findings indicate that a range of GBV prevention activities recommended by the global humanitarian community are currently being applied in a variety of settings. However, there remains a limited body of evidence on the effectiveness of GBV prevention programs, interventions, and strategies, especially among refugee populations.

          Conclusion: Commonly agreed upon standards or guidelines for evaluation of GBV prevention programming, and publication of evaluations conducted using these guidelines, could assist humanitarian stakeholders to build and disseminate an evidence base of effective GBV prevention interventions, programs and strategies. Evaluation of GBV prevention efforts, especially among refugee populations, must be given higher priority to justify continuation or revision of recommended GBV activities/programs being implemented in diverse humanitarian settings.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Contributors
          http://www.jhsph.edu/refugee
          Journal
          PLoS Curr
          PLoS Curr
          plos
          PLoS Currents
          Public Library of Science (San Francisco, USA )
          2157-3999
          19 April 2016
          : 8
          : ecurrents.dis.3a465b66f9327676d61eb8120eaa5499
          Affiliations
          Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
          Article
          10.1371/currents.dis.3a465b66f9327676d61eb8120eaa5499
          4865365
          27226926
          bb007271-5089-45c1-9c98-759123cc08be
          © 2016 Tappis, Freeman, Glass, Doocy, et al

          This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

          History
          Funding
          This review was initially conducted in 2013 as part of an evaluation of GBV prevention programming funded by the US Department of State Bureau for Population, Migration and Refugees. The authors’ views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Department of State or the United States Government.
          Categories
          Brief Report

          Uncategorized
          Uncategorized

          Comments

          Comment on this article