18
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Intentional Forgetting in Organizations: The Importance of Eliminating Retrieval Cues for Implementing New Routines

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          To cope with the already large, and ever increasing, amount of information stored in organizational memory, “forgetting,” as an important human memory process, might be transferred to the organizational context. Especially in intentionally planned change processes (e.g., change management), forgetting is an important precondition to impede the recall of obsolete routines and adapt to new strategic objectives accompanied by new organizational routines. We first comprehensively review the literature on the need for organizational forgetting and particularly on accidental vs. intentional forgetting. We discuss the current state of the art of theory and empirical evidence on forgetting from cognitive psychology in order to infer mechanisms applicable to the organizational context. In this respect, we emphasize retrieval theories and the relevance of retrieval cues important for forgetting. Subsequently, we transfer the empirical evidence that the elimination of retrieval cues leads to faster forgetting to the forgetting of organizational routines, as routines are part of organizational memory. We then propose a classification of cues (context, sensory, business process-related cues) that are relevant in the forgetting of routines, and discuss a meta-cue called the “situational strength” cue, which is relevant if cues of an old and a new routine are present simultaneously. Based on the classification as business process-related cues (information, team, task, object cues), we propose mechanisms to accelerate forgetting by eliminating specific cues based on the empirical and theoretical state of the art. We conclude that in intentional organizational change processes, the elimination of cues to accelerate forgetting should be used in change management practices.

          Related collections

          Most cited references168

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The Concept of Information Overload: A Review of Literature from Organization Science, Accounting, Marketing, MIS, and Related Disciplines

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Learning curves in manufacturing.

              Large increases in productivity are typically realized as organizations gain experience in production. These "learning curves" have been found in many organizations. Organizations vary considerably in the rates at which they learn. Some organizations show remarkable productivity gains, whereas others show little or no learning. Reasons for the variation observed in organizational learning curves include organizational "forgetting," employee turnover, transfer of knowledge from other products and other organizations, and economies of scale.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Psychol
                Front Psychol
                Front. Psychol.
                Frontiers in Psychology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-1078
                01 February 2018
                2018
                : 9
                : 51
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Industrial, Organisational and Business Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, Ruhr University Bochum , Bochum, Germany
                [2] 2Business Informatics, Processes and Systems, University of Potsdam , Potsdam, Germany
                Author notes

                Edited by: Pavlos A. Vlachos, ALBA Graduate Business School, Greece

                Reviewed by: Alexander Kaiser, Vienna University of Economics and Business, Austria; Matthias Philip Huehn, Universidad de Navarra, Spain

                *Correspondence: Annette Kluge annette.kluge@ 123456rub.de

                This article was submitted to Organizational Psychology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology

                Article
                10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00051
                5799275
                29449821
                bc196744-b52e-49ae-984b-d73cf376ed63
                Copyright © 2018 Kluge and Gronau.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 28 October 2017
                : 12 January 2018
                Page count
                Figures: 4, Tables: 1, Equations: 0, References: 183, Pages: 17, Words: 14449
                Funding
                Funded by: Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 10.13039/501100001659
                Award ID: KL2207/5-1
                Award ID: KL2207/6-1
                Categories
                Psychology
                Review

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                change management,multi-actor routines,business processes,knowledge management,organizational memory,situational strength

                Comments

                Comment on this article