1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The clinical manifestations, molecular mechanisms and treatment of craniosynostosis

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          ABSTRACT

          Craniosynostosis is a major congenital craniofacial disorder characterized by the premature fusion of cranial suture(s). Patients with severe craniosynostosis often have impairments in hearing, vision, intracranial pressure and/or neurocognitive functions. Craniosynostosis can result from mutations, chromosomal abnormalities or adverse environmental effects, and can occur in isolation or in association with numerous syndromes. To date, surgical correction remains the primary treatment for craniosynostosis, but it is associated with complications and with the potential for re-synostosis. There is, therefore, a strong unmet need for new therapies. Here, we provide a comprehensive review of our current understanding of craniosynostosis, including typical craniosynostosis types, their clinical manifestations, cranial suture development, and genetic and environmental causes. Based on studies from animal models, we present a framework for understanding the pathogenesis of craniosynostosis, with an emphasis on the loss of postnatal suture mesenchymal stem cells as an emerging disease-driving mechanism. We evaluate emerging treatment options and highlight the potential of mesenchymal stem cell-based suture regeneration as a therapeutic approach for craniosynostosis.

          Abstract

          Summary: Craniosynostosis has broad clinical manifestations and a complex etiology. We review studies from humans and animal models and discuss the developmental mechanisms of craniosynostosis and potential mesenchymal stem cell-based suture regeneration therapeutic strategies.

          Related collections

          Most cited references171

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Discovery of a periosteal stem cell mediating intramembranous bone formation

          Bone is comprised of separate inner endosteal and outer periosteal compartments, each with distinct contributions to bone physiology and each maintaining separate pools of cells due to physical separation by the bone cortex. While the skeletal stem cell giving rise to endosteal osteoblasts has been extensively studied, the identification of a periosteal stem cell has been elusive 1–5 . Here, we identify a periosteal stem cell (PSC) present in the long bones and calvarium of mice that displays clonal multipotency, self-renewal and sits at the apex of a differentiation hierarchy. Single cell and bulk transcriptional profiling show that PSCs display distinct transcriptional signatures in comparison with both other skeletal stem cells and mature mesenchymal cells. While other skeletal stem cells form bone via an initial cartilage template using the endochondral pathway 4 , PSCs form bone via a direct intramembranous route, providing a cellular basis for the divergence between intramembranous versus endochondral developmental pathways. However there is plasticity in this division, as PSCs acquire endochondral bone formation capacity in response to injury. Genetic blockade of the ability of PSCs to give rise to bone-forming osteoblasts results in selective impairments in cortical bone architecture and defects in fracture healing. A cell analogous to PSCs is present in the human periosteum, raising the possibility that PSCs are attractive targets for drug and cellular therapy for skeletal disorders. Moreover, the identification of PSCs provides evidence that bone contains multiple pools of stem cells, each with distinct physiologic functions.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Tissue origins and interactions in the mammalian skull vault.

            During mammalian evolution, expansion of the cerebral hemispheres was accompanied by expansion of the frontal and parietal bones of the skull vault and deployment of the coronal (fronto-parietal) and sagittal (parietal-parietal) sutures as major growth centres. Using a transgenic mouse with a permanent neural crest cell lineage marker, Wnt1-Cre/R26R, we show that both sutures are formed at a neural crest-mesoderm interface: the frontal bones are neural crest-derived and the parietal bones mesodermal, with a tongue of neural crest between the two parietal bones. By detailed analysis of neural crest migration pathways using X-gal staining, and mesodermal tracing by DiI labelling, we show that the neural crest-mesodermal tissue juxtaposition that later forms the coronal suture is established at E9.5 as the caudal boundary of the frontonasal mesenchyme. As the cerebral hemispheres expand, they extend caudally, passing beneath the neural crest-mesodermal interface within the dermis, carrying with them a layer of neural crest cells that forms their meningeal covering. Exposure of embryos to retinoic acid at E10.0 reduces this meningeal neural crest and inhibits parietal ossification, suggesting that intramembranous ossification of this mesodermal bone requires interaction with neural crest-derived meninges, whereas ossification of the neural crest-derived frontal bone is autonomous. These observations provide new perspectives on skull evolution and on human genetic abnormalities of skull growth and ossification.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A twist code determines the onset of osteoblast differentiation.

              Runx2 is necessary and sufficient for osteoblast differentiation, yet its expression precedes the appearance of osteoblasts by 4 days. Here we show that Twist proteins transiently inhibit Runx2 function during skeletogenesis. Twist-1 and -2 are expressed in Runx2-expressing cells throughout the skeleton early during development, and osteoblast-specific gene expression occurs only after their expression decreases. Double heterozygotes for Twist-1 and Runx2 deletion have none of the skull abnormalities observed in Runx2(+/-) mice, a Twist-2 null background rescues the clavicle phenotype of Runx2(+/-) mice, and Twist-1 or -2 deficiency leads to premature osteoblast differentiation. Furthermore, Twist-1 overexpression inhibits osteoblast differentiation without affecting Runx2 expression. Twist proteins' antiosteogenic function is mediated by a novel domain, the Twist box, which interacts with the Runx2 DNA binding domain to inhibit its function. In vivo mutagenesis confirms the antiosteogenic function of the Twist box. Thus, relief of inhibition by Twist proteins is a mandatory event precluding osteoblast differentiation.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Dis Model Mech
                Dis Model Mech
                DMM
                dmm
                Disease Models & Mechanisms
                The Company of Biologists Ltd
                1754-8403
                1754-8411
                1 April 2022
                22 April 2022
                22 April 2022
                : 15
                : 4
                : dmm049390
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Center for Craniofacial Molecular Biology, University of Southern California , Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA
                [2 ]Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California , Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA
                [3 ]Division of Plastic and Maxillofacial Surgery, Children's Hospital Los Angeles , Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA
                Author notes
                [* ]Author for correspondence ( ychai@ 123456usc.edu )
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2477-7247
                Article
                DMM049390
                10.1242/dmm.049390
                9044212
                35451466
                bd3fc92e-09a5-493c-8497-a7543b7461f1
                © 2022. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed.

                History
                Funding
                Funded by: National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000072;
                Award ID: R01 DE030901
                Award ID: R01 DE012711
                Categories
                Developmental Disorders
                Review

                Molecular medicine
                craniosynostosis,human genetics,environmental factors,animal models,mesenchymal stem cells,tissue regeneration

                Comments

                Comment on this article