41
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      Join us in our mission to support a more sustainable and resilient future. Get in touch to share your insights or read on to explore the transformative power of digital innovation and sustainability in construction and infrastructure development. https://bit.ly/3SGlr9O

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      From Industry 4.0 to Construction 4.0: barriers to the digital transformation of engineering and construction sectors

      , , ,
      Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management
      Emerald

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose

          The purpose of this study is to systematically identify, assess, and categorize the barriers to digital transformation (DT) in the engineering and construction sectors, and thus to better understand the impact and how these sectors might be overcome.

          Design/methodology/approach

          This study adopted a sequential mixed qualitative and quantitative data collection and analysis approach. DT barriers were first identified from relevant literature and verified by an expert panel. Then, a questionnaire survey assessing the impacts of the identified DT barriers was distributed to construction professionals in China, and 192 valid responses were retrieved. Further, the data obtained were analyzed using ranking analysis, exploratory factor analysis (EFA), and partial least squares-structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM).

          Findings

          Based on the ranking analysis, the top three barriers are “lack of industry-specific standards and laws,” “lack of clear vision, strategy and direction for DT,” and “lack of support from top management for DT.” EFA enabled the grouping of the 26 barriers into 3 categories: (1) lack of laws and regulations (LLR), (2) lack of support and leadership (LSL), and (3) lack of resources and professionals (LRP). The PLS-SEM analysis revealed that LLR, LSL, and LRP were found to have significant negative impacts on DT.

          Originality/value

          These findings contribute to the body of knowledge on DT in the construction industry and help construction firms and government bodies improve the understanding of these barriers to DT and put forward relevant policies and incentives, thus seizing the DT benefits as a way to enhance construction project management.

          Related collections

          Most cited references72

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Understanding the implications of digitisation and automation in the context of Industry 4.0: A triangulation approach and elements of a research agenda for the construction industry

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management
                ECAM
                Emerald
                0969-9988
                August 31 2022
                August 31 2022
                Article
                10.1108/ECAM-05-2022-0383
                bda87cdf-8c92-4745-ac9c-ffa276399e35
                © 2022

                https://www.emerald.com/insight/site-policies

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article