21
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Clinician-patient communication during the diagnostic workup: The ABIDE project

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          We aimed to describe clinician-patient communication in the diagnostic process of memory clinics, specifically clinician behavior known to facilitate knowledgeable participation of patients during consultations.

          Methods

          In this multicenter, observational study, we audio-recorded routine diagnostic consultations of 41 clinicians and 136 patients/caregivers at eight memory clinics. Patients/caregivers completed surveys after each audiotaped consultation. We used a study-specific coding scheme to categorize communication behavior.

          Results

          Clinicians often provided information on (results of) diagnostic testing. They infrequently invited questions and/or checked understanding. Clinician behavior to involve patients in decision-making about diagnostic testing was limited. Of note, patients/caregivers rarely expressed their information or involvement preferences. Yet, approximately, one quarter of them would have liked to receive more information.

          Discussion

          Involving patients more explicitly by means of shared decision-making could benefit the quality of care provided in memory clinics because it enables clinicians to attune the diagnostic workup to the individual patient's needs.

          Highlights

          • Considering patient preferences in the diagnostic process enables personalized care.

          • Knowledgeable participation in diagnostic consultations is therefore warranted.

          • Clinicians often provided information on diagnostic procedures and test results.

          • Yet, they showed limited behavior to promote patients' understanding.

          • And patients were seldom involved in decision-making about diagnostic testing.

          Related collections

          Most cited references31

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Shared decision making: Concepts, evidence, and practice

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Assessments of the extent to which health-care providers involve patients in decision making: a systematic review of studies using the OPTION instrument.

            We have no clear overview of the extent to which health-care providers involve patients in the decision-making process during consultations. The Observing Patient Involvement in Decision Making instrument (OPTION) was designed to assess this.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare.

              Although many clinicians feel they already use shared decision making, research shows a perception-reality gap. A M Stiggelbout and colleagues discuss why it is important and highlight some best practices.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Alzheimers Dement (Amst)
                Alzheimers Dement (Amst)
                Alzheimer's & Dementia : Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring
                Elsevier
                2352-8729
                29 July 2019
                December 2019
                29 July 2019
                : 11
                : 520-528
                Affiliations
                [a ]Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health research Institute, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                [b ]Department of Neurology, Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                [c ]Knowledge and Evaluation Research (KER) Unit, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA
                [d ]Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Medical Decision Making, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
                [e ]Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                [f ]Department of Clinical Geriatrics, Tergooi Hospital, Blaricum, The Netherlands
                [g ]Department of Clinical Geriatrics, Spaarne Gasthuis, Haarlem, The Netherlands
                [h ]Geriatric Center, Medical Center Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands
                [i ]Department of Neurology, Reinier de Graaf Gasthuis, Delft, The Netherlands
                [j ]Department of Neurology, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Ziekenhuis, Tilburg, The Netherlands
                [k ]Geriatric Department, NoordWest Ziekenhuis Groep, Alkmaar, The Netherlands
                [l ]Department of Neurology, LangeLand Ziekenhuis, Zoetermeer, The Netherlands
                [m ]Department of Neurology, Spaarne Gasthuis, Haarlem, The Netherlands
                Author notes
                []Corresponding author. Tel.: +31(0)204440823; Fax: +31(0)204448529. n.c.visser@ 123456amsterdamumc.nl
                Article
                S2352-8729(19)30047-8
                10.1016/j.dadm.2019.06.001
                6667786
                31388556
                be3c13b0-be8d-4e94-991e-d24eafc8f0c7
                © 2018 The Authors

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                Categories
                Diagnostic Assessment & Prognosis

                doctor-patient communication,alzheimer's disease,dementia,diagnostic work-up,patient engagement,shared decision-making

                Comments

                Comment on this article