13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A Newly Designed Intramedullary Nail for the Treatment of Diaphyseal Forearm Fractures in Adults

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background:

          The treatment of diaphyseal forearm fractures using open reduction and plate fixation is generally accepted as the best choice in many studies. However, periosteal stripping, haematoma evacuation may result in delayed union, nonunion and infection. Refracture after plate removal is another concern. To overcome these problems intramedullary nails (IM) with different designs have been used with various outcomes. However previous IM nails have some shortcomings such is rotational instability and interlocking difficulties. We evaluated the results of newly designed IM nail in the treatment of diaphyseal forearm fractures in adults.

          Materials and Methods:

          32 patients who had been treated with the interlocking IM nail for forearm fractures between 2011 and 2014 were included in this study. There were 23 males and 9 females with mean age of 36 years (range 18-68 years). 22 patients (68.8%) had both bone fractures. Nine patients (28.1%) had open fractures. The remaining ten patients (31.2%) had radius or ulna fractures. Grace and Eversmann rating system was used to assess functional evaluation. Patient reported outcomes were assessed using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire scores.

          Results:

          Union was achieved in all patients. The mean followup was 17 months (range 13 – 28 months). According to the Grace-Eversmann criteria, 27 patients (87.5%) had excellent or good results. The mean DASH score was 14 (range 5-36). Overall complication rate was 12.5%. Superficial infection was encountered in two patients. One patient had delayed union, however fracture healed without any additional surgical procedure. One patient who had open grade 3A, comminuted proximal third radius fracture developed radioulnar synostosis.

          Conclusions:

          The new design IM interlocking forearm nail provides satisfactory functional and radiological outcomes in the treatment of adult diaphyseal forearm fractures.

          Related collections

          Most cited references29

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Compression-plate fixation in acute diaphyseal fractures of the radius and ulna.

          At the Campbell Clinic and City of Memphis Hospital from 1960 to 1970, 244 patients (216 with closed and twenty-eight with open fractures) had 330 acute diaphyseal fractures of the radius and ulna which were treated with ASIF compression plates and followed for from four months to nine years. One hundred and twelve patients had fractures of both bones of the forearm; fifty, single fractures of the ulna; and eighty-two, single fractures of the radius. In all, 193 fractures of the radius and 137 fractures of the ulna were treated by compression plating. Sixty-three patients (25.9 per cent) with severely comminuted fractures also had iliac-bone grafts. The over-all rate of union for the radius was 97.9 per cent and for the ulna, 96.3 per cent. ASIF compression plates, therefore, provided a successful method for obtaining union and restoring optimum function after acute diaphyseal fractures of the forearm.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Compression-plate fixation of acute fractures of the diaphyses of the radius and ulna.

            A retrospective study was done of eighty-seven patients who had 129 diaphyseal fractures of either the radius or the ulna, or both, and who were treated with fixation using an AO dynamic-compression plate. Open fractures were internally fixed primarily, and both comminuted and open fractures routinely had bone-grafting. Ninety-eight per cent of the fractures united, and 92 per cent of the patients achieved an excellent or satisfactory functional result. The rate of infection was 2.3 per cent. Refracture occurred after removal of a 4.5-millimeter dynamic-compression plate in two patients, but there were no refractures after removal of a 3.5-millimeter plate. The 3.5-millimeter-plate system gave excellent results in patients who had a fracture of the forearm, and it minimized the risk of refracture. Our results demonstrated that immediate plate fixation of an open fracture of the forearm, with a low rate of complications, is possible.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Fracture and dislocation compendium. Orthopaedic Trauma Association Committee for Coding and Classification.

              (1995)
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Indian J Orthop
                Indian J Orthop
                IJOrtho
                Indian Journal of Orthopaedics
                Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd (India )
                0019-5413
                1998-3727
                Nov-Dec 2017
                : 51
                : 6
                : 697-703
                Affiliations
                [1] Department of Orthopaedic Research, The Rothman Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
                [1 ] Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Göztepe Training and Research Hospital, Medeniyet University, Istanbul, Turkey
                [2 ] Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Dicle University Medical Faculty, Diyarbakır, Turkey
                Author notes
                Address for correspondence: Dr. Ibrahim Azboy, Department of Orthopaedics, Rothman Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, Sheridan Building, 10 th Floor, 125, South 9 th Street, Suite 1000, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA. E-mail: ibrahimazboy@ 123456hotmail.com
                Article
                IJOrtho-51-697
                10.4103/ortho.IJOrtho_79_16
                5688865
                29200488
                c2573206-8ea4-462a-a9db-cd4fea34ba68
                Copyright: © 2017 Indian Journal of Orthopaedics

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

                History
                Categories
                Original Article

                Orthopedics
                forearm fractures,intramedullary nail,radius,ulna,nailing,intramedullary,forearm injuries,radius fractures

                Comments

                Comment on this article