2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The Influence of Gender Inequality in the Development of Job Insecurity: Differences Between Women and Men

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Job insecurity is an indicator of precarious work that refers to the fear of losing one's job. It is a relevant source of stress, with negative consequences on people's mental health. The main objective and contribution of this study is to identify how gender inequality and job insecurity are related, responding to the lack of consensus found in scientific literature in this field of study. To do so, a predictive study of job insecurity, broken down by gender, is developed, considering sociodemographic and labor variables as antecedents. The sample included 1,005 employees (420 men and 585 women) aged between 18 and 65, and a linear regression was conducted for each group. Results show that women perceive greater insecurity under precarious working conditions (temporary work, informal work, salary cuts, tenure), whereas in the case of men variables related to their professional careers (job category, education) and household incomes were relevant predictors. It is concluded that job insecurity affects both gender groups, but the conditions in which this perception grows are significantly impacted by gender inequality. These findings will allow for holistic and effective actions to decrease the effects of precarious work.

          Related collections

          Most cited references66

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Precarious employment: understanding an emerging social determinant of health.

          Employment precariousness is a social determinant that affects the health of workers, families, and communities. Its recent popularity has been spearheaded by three main developments: the surge in "flexible employment" and its associated erosion of workers' employment and working conditions since the mid-1970s; the growing interest in social determinants of health, including employment conditions; and the availability of new data and information systems. This article identifies the historical, economic, and political factors that link precarious employment to health and health equity; reviews concepts, models, instruments, and findings on precarious employment and health inequalities; summarizes the strengths and weaknesses of this literature; and highlights substantive and methodological challenges that need to be addressed. We identify two crucial future aims: to provide a compelling research program that expands our understanding of employment precariousness and to develop and evaluate policy programs that effectively put an end to its health-related impacts.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Precarious Work, Insecure Workers: Employment Relations in Transition

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              No security: a meta-analysis and review of job insecurity and its consequences.

              Meta-analytic techniques were used to estimate how job insecurity relates to its postulated outcomes. Consistent with the conceptual framework, the results indicate that job insecurity has detrimental consequences for employees' job attitudes, organizational attitudes, health, and, to some extent, their behavioral relationship with the organization. Moderator analyses suggest that these relationships may be underestimated in studies relying on single-item measures of job insecurity and that the behavioral consequences of insecurity are more detrimental among manual, as compared with nonmanual, workers. Recommendations made for future research include utilization of multidimensional measures, consideration of a broader spectrum of outcomes and moderators, and use of longitudinal designs.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Public Health
                Front Public Health
                Front. Public Health
                Frontiers in Public Health
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                2296-2565
                09 October 2020
                2020
                : 8
                : 526162
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Department of Psychology, Oviedo University , Oviedo, Spain
                [2] 2Department of Health Sciences, Universidad Internacional de La Rioja (UNIR) , Logroño, Spain
                [3] 3Research Unit Occupational & Organizational Psychology and Professional Learning (O2L) KU Leuven , Leuven, Belgium
                [4] 4Optentia Research Focus Area, North-West University , Vanderbijlpark, South Africa
                [5] 5Department of Psychology, Rovira i Virgili University , Tarragona, Spain
                Author notes

                Edited by: Ingrid Sivesind Mehlum, National Institute of Occupational Health, Norway

                Reviewed by: Victor C. W. Hoe, University of Malaya, Malaysia; Caterina Ledda, University of Catania, Italy

                *Correspondence: Esteban Agulló-Tomás estomas@ 123456uniovi.es

                This article was submitted to Occupational Health and Safety, a section of the journal Frontiers in Public Health

                Article
                10.3389/fpubh.2020.526162
                7581853
                33163470
                c2e0e651-d607-49d9-aa6a-e51b71ecca0e
                Copyright © 2020 Menéndez-Espina, Llosa, Agulló-Tomás, Rodríguez-Suárez, Sáiz-Villar, Lasheras-Díez, De Witte and Boada-Grau.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 12 January 2020
                : 15 September 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 4, Equations: 0, References: 75, Pages: 9, Words: 7884
                Categories
                Public Health
                Original Research

                job insecurity,temporary work,gender perspective,non-standard work,occupational health

                Comments

                Comment on this article