15
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Treatment for beta-blocker poisoning: a systematic review

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references114

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          AGREE II: advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in health care.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            2018 Annual Report of the American Association of Poison Control Centers’ National Poison Data System (NPDS): 36th Annual Report

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Narrow therapeutic index drugs: a clinical pharmacological consideration to flecainide

              Purpose The therapeutic index (TI) is the range of doses at which a medication is effective without unacceptable adverse events. Drugs with a narrow TI (NTIDs) have a narrow window between their effective doses and those at which they produce adverse toxic effects. Generic drugs may be substituted for brand-name drugs provided that they meet the recommended bioequivalence (BE) limits. However, an appropriate range of BE for NTIDs is essential to define due to the potential for ineffectiveness or adverse events. Flecainide is an antiarrhythmic agent that has the potential to be considered an NTID. This review aims to evaluate the literature surrounding guidelines on generic substitution for NTIDs and to evaluate the evidence for flecainide to be considered an NTID. Methods A review of recommendations from various regulatory authorities regarding BE and NTIDs, and publications regarding the NTID characteristics of flecainide, was carried out. Results Regulatory authorities generally recommend reduced BE limits for NTIDs. Some, but not all, regulatory authorities specify flecainide as an NTID. The literature review demonstrated that flecainide displays NTID characteristics including a steep drug dose–response relationship for safety and efficacy, a need for therapeutic drug monitoring of pharmacokinetic (PK) or pharmacodynamics measures and intra-subject variability in its PK properties. Conclusions There is much evidence for flecainide to be considered an NTID based on both preclinical and clinical data. A clear understanding of the potential of proarrhythmic effects or lack of efficacy, careful patient selection and regular monitoring are essential for the safe and rational administration of flecainide. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00228-015-1832-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                Clinical Toxicology
                Clinical Toxicology
                Informa UK Limited
                1556-3650
                1556-9519
                October 02 2020
                April 20 2020
                October 02 2020
                : 58
                : 10
                : 943-983
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Victorian Poisons Information Centre, Austin Health, Victoria, Australia;
                [2 ] Department of Emergency Medicine, Northern Health, Epping, Victoria;
                [3 ] Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia;
                [4 ] Monash Toxicology and Emergency Department, Monash Health, Victoria, Australia;
                [5 ] Department of Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Victoria, Australia;
                [6 ] Department of Emergency Medicine, Changi General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore;
                [7 ] Austin Health Library, Austin Health, Victoria, Australia;
                [8 ] Department of Medicine and Radiology, Centre for Integrated Critical Care, Melbourne Medical School, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
                Article
                10.1080/15563650.2020.1752918
                32310006
                c359cf1f-7789-425e-b141-4a5e7860a8ad
                © 2020
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article