12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      Call for Papers: Green Renal Replacement Therapy: Caring for the Environment

      Submit here before September 30, 2024

      About Blood Purification: 3.0 Impact Factor I 5.6 CiteScore I 0.83 Scimago Journal & Country Rank (SJR)

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Management of Cardiovascular Disease in Kidney Disease Study: Rationale and Design

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction: Atherosclerosis, inflammation, and vascular stiffness are prominent interrelated risk factors contributing to the high incidence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in patients with CKD. Conventional CVD management strategies in CKD largely target atherosclerotic CVD and have had a limited impact on the cardiovascular mortality in this population. Multiple in vivo and in vitro studies and epidemiological evidence from the rheumatologic cohorts have shown that low-dose hydroxychloroquine has beneficial effects on inflammation, endothelial function, insulin sensitivity, and metabolic syndrome. Our recent proof-of-concept animal study showed that hydroxychloroquine has marked protection against atherosclerosis and vascular stiffness. We hypothesize that hydroxychloroquine has the potential to provide significant cardiovascular benefits in patients with CKD. Methods: The Management of Cardiovascular disease in Kidney disease study (NCT 03636152) is a phase 2B, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial evaluating the effects of low-dose hydroxychloroquine therapy on the parameters of atherosclerosis, inflammation, and vascular stiffness in patients with CKD. The study plans to enroll 100 CKD patients estimated to be at high cardiovascular risk by a combination of low estimated glomerular filtration rate and albuminuria and treat them for 18 months with hydroxychloroquine or placebo in 1:1 allocation. Results: The study will assess the change in the total carotid plaque volume as measured by serial noncontrast carotid MRI as the primary outcome and the serial changes in plasma inflammation markers, vascular stiffness, renal function, and the composition characteristics of the carotid plaque as secondary outcome measures. Discussion/Conclusion: The results of this trial will provide the proof-of-applicability for hydroxychloroquine in the CVD in CKD. If positive, this trial should lead to phase-3 trials with clinical end points for this potentially transformative, novel, and inexpensive therapy for CVD in CKD.

          Related collections

          Most cited references55

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A trial of darbepoetin alfa in type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease.

          Anemia is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular and renal events among patients with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease. Although darbepoetin alfa can effectively increase hemoglobin levels, its effect on clinical outcomes in these patients has not been adequately tested. In this study involving 4038 patients with diabetes, chronic kidney disease, and anemia, we randomly assigned 2012 patients to darbepoetin alfa to achieve a hemoglobin level of approximately 13 g per deciliter and 2026 patients to placebo, with rescue darbepoetin alfa when the hemoglobin level was less than 9.0 g per deciliter. The primary end points were the composite outcomes of death or a cardiovascular event (nonfatal myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, stroke, or hospitalization for myocardial ischemia) and of death or end-stage renal disease. Death or a cardiovascular event occurred in 632 patients assigned to darbepoetin alfa and 602 patients assigned to placebo (hazard ratio for darbepoetin alfa vs. placebo, 1.05; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.94 to 1.17; P=0.41). Death or end-stage renal disease occurred in 652 patients assigned to darbepoetin alfa and 618 patients assigned to placebo (hazard ratio, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.95 to 1.19; P=0.29). Fatal or nonfatal stroke occurred in 101 patients assigned to darbepoetin alfa and 53 patients assigned to placebo (hazard ratio, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.38 to 2.68; P<0.001). Red-cell transfusions were administered to 297 patients assigned to darbepoetin alfa and 496 patients assigned to placebo (P<0.001). There was only a modest improvement in patient-reported fatigue in the darbepoetin alfa group as compared with the placebo group. The use of darbepoetin alfa in patients with diabetes, chronic kidney disease, and moderate anemia who were not undergoing dialysis did not reduce the risk of either of the two primary composite outcomes (either death or a cardiovascular event or death or a renal event) and was associated with an increased risk of stroke. For many persons involved in clinical decision making, this risk will outweigh the potential benefits. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00093015.) 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Expert consensus document on arterial stiffness: methodological issues and clinical applications.

            In recent years, great emphasis has been placed on the role of arterial stiffness in the development of cardiovascular diseases. Indeed, the assessment of arterial stiffness is increasingly used in the clinical assessment of patients. Although several papers have previously addressed the methodological issues concerning the various indices of arterial stiffness currently available, and their clinical applications, clinicians and researchers still report difficulties in selecting the most appropriate methodology for their specific use. This paper summarizes the proceedings of several meetings of the European Network for Non-invasive Investigation of Large Arteries and is aimed at providing an updated and practical overview of the most relevant methodological aspects and clinical applications in this area.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Role of endothelial dysfunction in atherosclerosis.

              J Davignon (2004)
              As the major regulator of vascular homeostasis, the endothelium exerts a number of vasoprotective effects, such as vasodilation, suppression of smooth muscle cell growth, and inhibition of inflammatory responses. Many of these effects are largely mediated by nitric oxide, the most potent endogenous vasodilator. Nitric oxide opposes the effects of endothelium-derived vasoconstrictors and inhibits oxidation of low-density lipoprotein. A defect in the production or activity of nitric oxide leads to endothelial dysfunction, signaled by impaired endothelium-dependent vasodilation. Accumulating evidence suggests that endothelial dysfunction is an early marker for atherosclerosis and can be detected before structural changes to the vessel wall are apparent on angiography or ultrasound. Many of the risk factors that predispose to atherosclerosis can also cause endothelial dysfunction, and the presence of multiple risk factors has been found to predict endothelial dysfunction. A number of clinical trials have shown that 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors (statins) improve endothelial dysfunction in patients with coronary risk factors beyond what could be attributed to their impact on plasma lipids. Studies have elucidated several possible mechanisms by which statin therapy may improve endothelial dysfunction, including upregulation of nitric oxide production or activity and reduction of oxidative stress.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                AJN
                Am J Nephrol
                10.1159/issn.0250-8095
                American Journal of Nephrology
                S. Karger AG
                0250-8095
                1421-9670
                2021
                March 2021
                26 February 2021
                : 52
                : 1
                : 36-44
                Affiliations
                [_a] aDepartment of Medicine, North Florida/South Georgia Veterans Health System, Gainesville, Florida, USA
                [_b] bDivision of Nephrology, Hypertension, and Transplantation, Department of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
                [_c] cDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
                [_d] dMedical Service, Veterans Affairs Salt Lake City Healthcare System, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
                [_e] eDivision of Nephrology & Hypertension, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
                [_f] fDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
                [_g] gDepartment of Ophthalmology, North Florida/South Georgia Veterans Health System, Gainesville, Florida, USA
                [_h] hMcKnight Brain Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
                [_i] iDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA
                [_j] jCentral Arkansas Veteran Healthcare System, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA
                Author notes
                *Ashutosh M. Shukla, Director of Advanced CKD and Home Dialysis Program, Division of Nephrology, Hypertension and Transplantation, University of Florida, 1600 Archer St., Gainesville, FL 32610 (USA), ashutosh.shukla@medicine.ufl.edu
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1471-0324
                Article
                513567 Am J Nephrol 2021;52:36–44
                10.1159/000513567
                33640890
                c37eb88b-c844-4741-955a-147b219e476f
                © 2021 S. Karger AG, Basel

                Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

                History
                : 03 November 2020
                : 02 December 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 2, Pages: 9
                Categories
                Patient-Oriented, Translational Research: Research Article

                Cardiovascular Medicine,Nephrology
                Vascular stiffness,Inflammation,Cardiovascular disease,Clinical trial,Chronic kidney disease

                Comments

                Comment on this article