2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      One shot spinal morphine injection for postthoracotomy pain control in children

      , , ,
      Pediatric Anesthesia
      Wiley

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references5

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A review of intrathecal and epidural analgesia after spinal surgery in children.

          In view of the overall experience regarding regional anesthetic techniques to control postoperative pain in infants and children, it is feasible that a similar efficacy and safety profile can be obtained when using such techniques after major orthopedic procedures such as anterior or posterior spinal fusion. I reviewed previous reports regarding the use of neuraxial techniques to provide analgesia after spine surgery in the pediatric population. Variations in both the surgical procedure and the analgesic technique may make the comparison among studies somewhat impractical. Variations of the analgesic technique include 1). the dose of the medications used; 2). the route of delivery (intrathecal or epidural); 3). the mode of delivery (single dose, intermittent bolus dosing, and continuous infusion); 4). the number of epidural catheters used (one versus two); 5). the medications infused (opioids, local anesthetics, or both); 6). the opioid used (morphine, fentanyl, hydromorphone); and 7). the analgesic regimen of the control group (intermittent "as needed" morphine or patient-controlled analgesia). Although limited data are available to document the analgesic superiority of these techniques over parenteral opioids, clinical data offer evidence of other benefits, including decreased intraoperative blood loss and quicker return of gastrointestinal function.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Intercostal nerve block with Bupivacaine for post-thoracotomy pain relief in children.

            The purpose of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of Intercostal Nerve Block (ICB) with Bupivacaine (BUP) to produce satisfactory analgesia after thoracotomy in children. We studied 20 children aged between 5 and 12 years, scheduled for thoracotomy under general anaesthesia. The children were randomly divided into two groups. In the first group (n = 10) 3 mg/kg BUP 0.5 % with epinephrine 1 : 200 000 was injected by the surgeon under direct vision, into the intercostal space where thoracotomy was performed. In the control group (n = 10) meperidine 1 mg/kg was administered i.v. at the same surgical time, and afterwards the chest was closed. Postoperatively the vital signs, the side effects and the total postoperative analgesic requirements were recorded. The mean duration of postoperative analgesia produced was longer in the BUP group (p < 0.001). None of the children in BUP group suffered from BUP toxicity, while in the control group a high incidence of vomiting and nausea was noticed (p < 0.005). It is concluded that ICB with BUP produces satisfactory and safe analgesia for the early postoperative period after thoracotomy in children.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Postoperative pain control

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Pediatric Anesthesia
                Pediatric Anesthesia
                Wiley
                1155-5645
                1460-9592
                November 2004
                November 2004
                : 14
                : 11
                : 971-972
                Article
                10.1111/j.1460-9592.2004.01450.x
                c4826849-f87e-432d-a201-982b295bb672
                © 2004

                http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article