0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Characterisation of digital therapeutic clinical trials: a systematic review with natural language processing

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Digital therapeutics (DTx) are a somewhat novel class of US Food and Drug Administration-regulated software that help patients prevent, manage, or treat disease. Here, we use natural language processing to characterise registered DTx clinical trials and provide insights into the clinical development landscape for these novel therapeutics. We identified 449 DTx clinical trials, initiated or expected to be initiated between 2010 and 2030, from ClinicalTrials.gov using 27 search terms, and available data were analysed, including trial durations, locations, MeSH categories, enrolment, and sponsor types. Topic modelling of eligibility criteria, done with BERTopic, showed that DTx trials frequently exclude patients on the basis of age, comorbidities, pregnancy, language barriers, and digital determinants of health, including smartphone or data plan access. Our comprehensive overview of the DTx development landscape highlights challenges in designing inclusive DTx clinical trials and presents opportunities for clinicians and researchers to address these challenges. Finally, we provide an interactive dashboard for readers to conduct their own analyses.

          Related collections

          Most cited references23

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          SciPy 1.0: fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python

          SciPy is an open-source scientific computing library for the Python programming language. Since its initial release in 2001, SciPy has become a de facto standard for leveraging scientific algorithms in Python, with over 600 unique code contributors, thousands of dependent packages, over 100,000 dependent repositories and millions of downloads per year. In this work, we provide an overview of the capabilities and development practices of SciPy 1.0 and highlight some recent technical developments.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Making Neighborhood-Disadvantage Metrics Accessible — The Neighborhood Atlas

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Characteristics of clinical trials registered in ClinicalTrials.gov, 2007-2010.

              Recent reports highlight gaps between guidelines-based treatment recommendations and evidence from clinical trials that supports those recommendations. Strengthened reporting requirements for studies registered with ClinicalTrials.gov enable a comprehensive evaluation of the national trials portfolio. To examine fundamental characteristics of interventional clinical trials registered in the ClinicalTrials.gov database. A data set comprising 96,346 clinical studies from ClinicalTrials.gov was downloaded on September 27, 2010, and entered into a relational database to analyze aggregate data. Interventional trials were identified and analyses were focused on 3 clinical specialties-cardiovascular, mental health, and oncology-that together encompass the largest number of disability-adjusted life-years lost in the United States. Characteristics of registered clinical trials as reported data elements in the trial registry; how those characteristics have changed over time; differences in characteristics as a function of clinical specialty; and factors associated with use of randomization, blinding, and data monitoring committees (DMCs). The number of registered interventional clinical trials increased from 28,881 (October 2004-September 2007) to 40,970 (October 2007-September 2010), and the number of missing data elements has generally declined. Most interventional trials registered between 2007 and 2010 were small, with 62% enrolling 100 or fewer participants. Many clinical trials were single-center (66%; 24,788/37,520) and funded by organizations other than industry or the National Institutes of Health (NIH) (47%; 17,592/37,520). Heterogeneity in the reported methods by clinical specialty; sponsor type; and the reported use of DMCs, randomization, and blinding was evident. For example, reported use of DMCs was less common in industry-sponsored vs NIH-sponsored trials (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 0.11; 95% CI, 0.09-0.14), earlier-phase vs phase 3 trials (adjusted OR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.76-0.91), and mental health trials vs those in the other 2 specialties. In similar comparisons, randomization and blinding were less frequently reported in earlier-phase, oncology, and device trials. Clinical trials registered in ClinicalTrials.gov are dominated by small trials and contain significant heterogeneity in methodological approaches, including reported use of randomization, blinding, and DMCs.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                101751302
                48799
                Lancet Digit Health
                Lancet Digit Health
                The Lancet. Digital health
                2589-7500
                1 April 2024
                March 2024
                07 May 2024
                : 6
                : 3
                : e222-e229
                Affiliations
                Bakar Computational Health Sciences Institute, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
                Bakar Computational Health Sciences Institute, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
                Bakar Computational Health Sciences Institute, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
                Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
                Bakar Computational Health Sciences Institute, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
                Bakar Computational Health Sciences Institute, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
                Department of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
                UC Davis Health, University of California, Sacramento, CA, USA
                Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
                School of Biomedical Informatics, UTHealth Houston, Houston, TX, USA
                Bakar Computational Health Sciences Institute, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
                Bakar Computational Health Sciences Institute, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
                Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
                Bakar Computational Health Sciences Institute, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
                University of California Health, Oakland, CA, USA
                Author notes

                Contributors

                BYM, AJB, DA, AX, EB, MSub, and MW conceptualised the systematic review. BYM, DA, and MW curated the data. BYM, DA, AX, and MW developed and used the software and did formal data analysis. BYM, MSus, and AX designed the methodology, and AJB, MSus, VR, and RV supervised the research. BYM and AJB wrote the original draft. MSus, VR, AX, RV, and DA wrote, reviewed, and edited the manuscript.

                Correspondence to: Brenda Y Miao, Bakar Computational Health Sciences Institute, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA, brenda.miao@ 123456ucsf.edu
                Article
                NIHMS1979894
                10.1016/S2589-7500(23)00244-3
                11074920
                38395542
                c4865e00-9eca-4201-8dbd-ae21ff0a7351

                This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license.

                History
                Categories
                Article

                Comments

                Comment on this article