3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Percutaneous Spinal Ablation in a Sheep Model: Protective Capacity of an Intact Cortex, Correlation of Ablation Parameters with Ablation Zone Size, and Correlation of Postablation MRI and Pathologic Findings

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:

          Despite the growing use of percutaneous ablation therapy for the treatment of metastatic spine disease, several issues have yet to be fully addressed. Our aims were to determine whether the vertebral body cortex protects against ablation-induced spinal cord injury; correlate radiofrequency, cryo-, and microwave ablation parameters with resulting spinal ablation zone dimensions and describe normal spinal marrow postablation changes on MR imaging.

          MATERIALS AND METHODS:

          Ten thoracolumbar vertebrae in 3 sheep were treated with radiofrequency ablation, cryoablation, or microwave ablation under fluoroscopic guidance. Technique parameters were chosen to produce ablation zones that exceeded the volume of the vertebral bodies in sheep 1 and were confined to the vertebrae in sheep 2 and 3. Expected ablation zone dimensions were based on data provided by the device manufacturers. Postablation MR imaging was performed at 48 hours (sheep 1) or 7 days (sheep 2 and 3).

          RESULTS:

          In sheep 1, cryoablation and microwave ablations extended into the spinal canal and caused histologically confirmed neurologic injury, but radiofrequency ablation did not. The mean difference between the lengths of the radiofrequency ablation zone dimensions measured on gross pathology compared with those expected was 9.6 ± 4.1 mm. The gross pathologic cryo- and microwave ablation zone dimensions were within 1 mm of those expected. All modalities produced a nonenhancing ablation zone with a rim of enhancement, corresponding histologically to marrow necrosis and hemorrhagic congestion.

          CONCLUSIONS:

          An intact cortex appears to protect against radiofrequency ablation-induced spinal cord injury, but not against non-impedance-based modalities. Ablation dimensions produced by microwave and cryoablation are similar to those expected, while radiofrequency ablation dimensions are smaller. Ablation of normal marrow produces a rim of enhancement at the margin of the ablation zone on MR imaging.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          AJNR Am J Neuroradiol
          AJNR Am J Neuroradiol
          ajnr
          ajnr
          AJNR
          AJNR: American Journal of Neuroradiology
          American Society of Neuroradiology
          0195-6108
          1936-959X
          August 2017
          : 38
          : 8
          : 1653-1659
          Affiliations
          [1] aFrom the Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology (A.N.W., T.J.H., M.V.F., J.W.J.)
          [2] bDepartment of Neurosurgery (Z.S.Z., B.H.S.)
          [3] cDivision of Comparative Medicine (S.C.G., M.R.T.), Washington University, St Louis, Missouri.
          Author notes
          Please address correspondence to Adam N. Wallace, MD, Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University, 510 South Kingshighway Blvd, St Louis, MO 63141; e-mail: wallacea@ 123456mir.wustl.edu
          Author information
          http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0450-8464
          http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2259-2057
          http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5647-3227
          http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3332-2888
          http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6292-5426
          http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8117-527X
          http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7371-3296
          http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5069-6139
          Article
          PMC7960423 PMC7960423 7960423 16-01193
          10.3174/ajnr.A5228
          7960423
          28572150
          c4911c84-b7d1-4f27-83ff-d336503e22a1
          © 2017 by American Journal of Neuroradiology
          History
          : 28 December 2016
          : 17 March 2017
          Categories
          Spine

          Comments

          Comment on this article