15
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Thinking Outside the Pillbox — Medication Adherence as a Priority for Health Care Reform

      ,
      New England Journal of Medicine
      Massachusetts Medical Society

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references4

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Adherence to Medication

          New England Journal of Medicine, 353(5), 487-497
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Is Patient Activation Associated With Outcomes of Care for Adults With Chronic Conditions?

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Impact of a prescription copayment increase on lipid-lowering medication adherence in veterans.

              In February 2002, the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) increased copayments from $2 to $7 per 30-day drug supply of each medication for many veterans. We examined the impact of the copayment increase on lipid-lowering medication adherence. This quasiexperimental study used electronic records of 5604 veterans receiving care at the Philadelphia VA Medical Center from November 1999 to April 2004. The all copayment group included veterans subject to copayments for all drugs with no annual cap. Veterans subject to copayments for drugs only if indicated for a non-service-connected condition with an annual cap of $840 for out-of-pocket costs made up the some copayment group. Veterans who remained copayment exempt formed a natural control group (no copayment group). Patients were identified as adherent if the proportion of days covered with lipid-lowering medications was > or =80%. Patients were identified as having a continuous gap if they had at least 1 continuous episode with no lipid-lowering medications for > or =90 days. A difference-in-difference approach compared changes in lipid-lowering medication adherence during the 24 months before and after copayment increase among veterans subject to the copayment change with those who were not. Adherence declined in all 3 groups after the copayment increase. However, the percentage of patients who were adherent (proportion of days covered > or =80%) declined significantly more in the all copayment (-19.2%) and some copayment (-19.3%) groups relative to the exempt group (-11.9%). The incidence of a continuous gap increased significantly at twice the rate in both copayment groups (all copayment group, 24.6%; some copayment group, 24.1%) as the exempt group (11.7%). Compared with the exempt group, the odds of having a continuous gap in the after relative to the before period were significantly higher in both the all copayment group (odds ratio, 3.04; 95% confidence interval, 2.29 to 4.03) and the some copayment group (odds ratio, 1.85; 95% confidence interval, 1.43 to 2.40). Similar results were seen in subgroups of patients at high risk for coronary heart disease, high medication users, and elderly veterans. The copayment increase adversely affected lipid-lowering medication adherence among veterans, including those at high coronary heart disease risk.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                New England Journal of Medicine
                N Engl J Med
                Massachusetts Medical Society
                0028-4793
                1533-4406
                April 29 2010
                April 29 2010
                : 362
                : 17
                : 1553-1555
                Article
                10.1056/NEJMp1002305
                20375400
                c58a1c08-12b1-4701-8447-3c133cf35ed3
                © 2010
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article