2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Multicenter randomized clinical trial of endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke. The effect of periprocedural medication: acetylsalicylic acid, unfractionated heparin, both, or neither (MR CLEAN-MED). Rationale and study design

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Despite evidence of a quite large beneficial effect of endovascular treatment (EVT) for ischemic stroke caused by anterior circulation large vessel occlusion, many patients do not recover even after complete recanalization. To some extent, this may be attributable to incomplete microvascular reperfusion, which can possibly be improved by antiplatelet agents and heparin. It is unknown whether periprocedural antithrombotic medication in patients treated with EVT improves functional outcome. The aim of this study is to assess the effect of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) and unfractionated heparin (UFH), alone, or in combination, given to patients with an ischemic stroke caused by an intracranial large vessel occlusion in the anterior circulation during EVT.

          Methods

          MR CLEAN-MED is a multicenter phase III trial with a prospective, 2 × 3 factorial randomized, open label, blinded end-point (PROBE) design, which aims to enroll 1500 patients. The trial is designed to evaluate the effect of intravenous ASA (300 mg), UFH (low or moderate dose), both or neither as adjunctive therapy to EVT. We enroll adult patients with a clinical diagnosis of stroke (NIHSS ≥ 2) and with a confirmed intracranial large vessel occlusion in the anterior circulation on CTA or MRA, when EVT within 6 h from symptom onset is indicated and possible. The primary outcome is the score on the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 90 days. Treatment effect on the mRS will be estimated with ordinal logistic regression analysis, with adjustment for main prognostic variables. Secondary outcomes include stroke severity measured with the NIHSS at 24 h and at 5–7 days, follow-up infarct volume, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), and mortality.

          Discussion

          Clinical equipoise exists whether antithrombotic medication should be administered during EVT for a large vessel occlusion, as ASA and/or UFH may improve functional outcome, but might also lead to an increased risk of sICH. When one or both of the study treatments show the anticipated effect on outcome, we will be able to improve outcome of patients treated with EVT by 5%. This amounts to more than 50 patients annually in the Netherlands, more than 1800 in Europe, and more than 1300 in the USA.

          Trial registration

          ISRCT, ISRCTN76741621. Dec 6, 2017.

          Related collections

          Most cited references40

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The Heidelberg Bleeding Classification: Classification of Bleeding Events After Ischemic Stroke and Reperfusion Therapy.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Neutrophil extracellular traps in ischemic stroke thrombi.

            Neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) have been shown to promote thrombus formation. Little is known about the exact composition of thrombi that cause ischemic stroke. In particular, no information is yet available on the presence of NETs in cerebral occlusions. Such information is, however, essential to improve current thrombolytic therapy with tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA). This study aimed at investigating the presence of neutrophils and more specifically NETs in ischemic stroke thrombi.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Improving the assessment of outcomes in stroke: use of a structured interview to assign grades on the modified Rankin Scale.

              The modified Rankin Scale is widely used to assess changes in activity and lifestyle after stroke, but it has been criticized for its subjectivity. The purpose of the present study was to compare conventional assessment on the modified Rankin Scale with assessment through a structured interview. Sixty-three patients with stroke 6 to 24 months previously were interviewed and graded independently on the modified Rankin Scale by 2 observers. These observers then underwent training in use of a structured interview for the scale that covered 5 areas of everyday function. Eight weeks after the first assessment, the same observers reassessed 58 of these patients using the structured interview. Interrater reliability was measured with the kappa statistic (weighted with quadratic weights). For the scale applied conventionally, overall agreement between the 2 raters was 57% (kappa(w)=0.78); 1 rater assigned significantly lower grades than the other (P=0.048). On the structured interview, the overall agreement between raters was 78% (kappa(w)=0.93), and there was no overall difference between raters in grades assigned (P=0.17). Rankin grades from the conventional assessment and the structured interview were highly correlated, but there was significantly less disagreement between raters when the structured interview was used (P=0.004). Variability and bias between raters in assigning patients to Rankin grades may be reduced by use of a structured interview. Use of a structured interview for the scale could potentially improve the quality of results from clinical studies in stroke.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                b.roozenbeek@erasmusmc.nl
                Journal
                Trials
                Trials
                Trials
                BioMed Central (London )
                1745-6215
                14 July 2020
                14 July 2020
                2020
                : 21
                : 644
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.5645.2, ISNI 000000040459992X, Department of Neurology, , Erasmus MC University Medical Center, ; Rotterdam, The Netherlands
                [2 ]GRID grid.5645.2, ISNI 000000040459992X, Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, , Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, ; Rotterdam, The Netherlands
                [3 ]GRID grid.5645.2, ISNI 000000040459992X, Department of Public Health, , Erasmus MC University Medical Center, ; Rotterdam, The Netherlands
                [4 ]GRID grid.452600.5, ISNI 0000 0001 0547 5927, Department of Neurology, , Isala, ; Zwolle, The Netherlands
                [5 ]Department of Neurology, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
                [6 ]GRID grid.413591.b, ISNI 0000 0004 0568 6689, Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, , HagaZiekenhuis, Radiology, ; Den Haag, The Netherlands
                [7 ]GRID grid.10417.33, ISNI 0000 0004 0444 9382, Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, , Radboud University Medical Center, ; Nijmegen, The Netherlands
                [8 ]Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
                [9 ]GRID grid.7177.6, ISNI 0000000084992262, Department of Neurology, , Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, location AMC, ; Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                [10 ]GRID grid.7177.6, ISNI 0000000084992262, Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, , Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, location AMC, ; Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8320-8303
                Article
                4514
                10.1186/s13063-020-04514-9
                7362523
                32665035
                c61b96fb-1258-4ef2-902c-2d1a06961e7c
                © The Author(s) 2020

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

                History
                : 7 February 2020
                : 15 June 2020
                Categories
                Study Protocol
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2020

                Medicine
                ischemic stroke,acetylsalicylic acid,heparin,cerebrovascular disorders,randomized controlled trial,endovascular treatment,thrombectomy,periprocedural

                Comments

                Comment on this article