1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Characterization and clinical implications of different malignant transformation patterns in diffuse low‐grade gliomas

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Malignant transformation (MT) of low‐grade gliomas (LGGs) to a higher‐grade variant seems inevitable, yet it remains unclear which LGG patients will progress to grade 3 or even directly to grade 4 after receiving a long course of treatment. To elucidate this, we conducted a retrospective cohort study based on 229 adults with recurrent LGG. Our study aimed to disclose the characteristics of different MT patterns and to build predictive models for patients with LGG. Patients were allocated into group 2–2 ( n = 81, 35.4%), group 2–3 ( n = 91, 39.7%), and group 2–4 ( n = 57, 24.9%), based on their MT patterns. Patients who underwent MT showed lower Karnofsky performance scale (KPS) scores, larger tumor sizes, smaller extents of resection (EOR), higher Ki‐67 indices, lower rates of 1p/19q codeletion, but higher rates of subventricular involvement, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, astrocytoma, and post‐progression enhancement (PPE) compared with those in group 2–2 ( p < 0.01). On multivariate logistic regression, 1p/19q codeletion, Ki‐67 index, radiotherapy, EOR, and KPS score were independently associated with MT ( p < 0.05). Survival analyses demonstrated that patients in group 2–2 had the longest survival, followed by group 2–3 and then group 2–4 ( p < 0.0001). Based on these independent parameters, we constructed a nomogram model that exhibited superior potential (sensitivity: 0.864, specificity: 0.814, and accuracy: 0.843) compared with PPE in early prediction of MT. Combining the factors of 1p/19q codeletion, Ki‐67 index, radiotherapy, EOR, and KPS score that were presented at initial diagnosis could precisely forecast the subsequent MT patterns of patients with LGG.

          Abstract

          Post‐progression enhancement is a marker of malignant transformation with low specificity. The combined model based on 1p/19q codeletion, Ki‐67 index, radiotherapy, extent of resection, and Karnofsky performance scale ( KPS) score shows optimal value in predicting malignant transformation. 1p/19q codeletion and post‐progression enhancement can be used to screen out patients who underwent skip‐graded malignant transformation.

          Related collections

          Most cited references41

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The 2021 WHO Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: a summary

          The fifth edition of the WHO Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System (CNS), published in 2021, is the sixth version of the international standard for the classification of brain and spinal cord tumors. Building on the 2016 updated fourth edition and the work of the Consortium to Inform Molecular and Practical Approaches to CNS Tumor Taxonomy, the 2021 fifth edition introduces major changes that advance the role of molecular diagnostics in CNS tumor classification. At the same time, it remains wedded to other established approaches to tumor diagnosis such as histology and immunohistochemistry. In doing so, the fifth edition establishes some different approaches to both CNS tumor nomenclature and grading and it emphasizes the importance of integrated diagnoses and layered reports. New tumor types and subtypes are introduced, some based on novel diagnostic technologies such as DNA methylome profiling. The present review summarizes the major general changes in the 2021 fifth edition classification and the specific changes in each taxonomic category. It is hoped that this summary provides an overview to facilitate more in-depth exploration of the entire fifth edition of the WHO Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            cIMPACT-NOW update 3: recommended diagnostic criteria for “Diffuse astrocytic glioma, IDH-wildtype, with molecular features of glioblastoma, WHO grade IV”

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Association of the Extent of Resection With Survival in Glioblastoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

              Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) remains almost invariably fatal despite optimal surgical and medical therapy. The association between the extent of tumor resection (EOR) and outcome remains undefined, notwithstanding many relevant studies.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                chenxd1111@sohu.com
                yangjbysy@bjmu.edu.cn
                linsong2005@126.com
                Journal
                Cancer Sci
                Cancer Sci
                10.1111/(ISSN)1349-7006
                CAS
                Cancer Science
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                1347-9032
                1349-7006
                18 June 2023
                September 2023
                : 114
                : 9 ( doiID: 10.1111/cas.v114.9 )
                : 3708-3718
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Department of Neurosurgery Peking University Third Hospital, Peking University Beijing China
                [ 2 ] Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital Capital Medical University Beijing China
                [ 3 ] Department of Neurosurgery, Henan Provincial People's Hospital People's Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou University Zhengzhou China
                [ 4 ] National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Center of Brain Tumor Beijing Institute for Brain Disorders and Beijing Key Laboratory of Brain Tumor Beijing China
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Song Lin, Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

                Email: linsong2005@ 123456126.com .

                Jun Yang and Xiaodong Chen, Department of Neurosurgery, Peking University Third Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, China.

                Email: yangjbysy@ 123456bjmu.edu.cn and chenxd1111@ 123456sohu.com

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8114-9741
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5721-274X
                Article
                CAS15889 CAS-OA-0675-2023.R1
                10.1111/cas.15889
                10475770
                37332121
                c69e7c91-f4b7-4629-b39f-46a4fb34dcd1
                © 2023 The Authors. Cancer Science published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Cancer Association.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

                History
                : 08 May 2023
                : 31 March 2023
                : 01 June 2023
                Page count
                Figures: 6, Tables: 2, Pages: 11, Words: 5752
                Funding
                Funded by: National Natural Science Foundation of China , doi 10.13039/501100001809;
                Award ID: 82202983
                Categories
                Original Article
                ORIGINAL ARTICLES
                Clinical Research
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                September 2023
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.3.3 mode:remove_FC converted:04.09.2023

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                prognosis,low‐grade gliomas,malignant transformation,mathematical model,predictive marker

                Comments

                Comment on this article