8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Classification of Movement Intention Using Independent Components of Premovement EEG

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Many previous studies on brain-machine interfaces (BMIs) have focused on electroencephalography (EEG) signals elicited during motor-command execution to generate device commands. However, exploiting pre-execution brain activity related to movement intention could improve the practical applicability of BMIs. Therefore, in this study we investigated whether EEG signals occurring before movement execution could be used to classify movement intention. Six subjects performed reaching tasks that required them to move a cursor to one of four targets distributed horizontally and vertically from the center. Using independent components of EEG acquired during a premovement phase, two-class classifications were performed for left vs. right trials and top vs. bottom trials using a support vector machine. Instructions were presented visually (test) and aurally (condition). In the test condition, accuracy for a single window was about 75%, and it increased to 85% in classification using two windows. In the control condition, accuracy for a single window was about 73%, and it increased to 80% in classification using two windows. Classification results showed that a combination of two windows from different time intervals during the premovement phase improved classification performance in the both conditions compared to a single window classification. By categorizing the independent components according to spatial pattern, we found that information depending on the modality can improve classification performance. We confirmed that EEG signals occurring during movement preparation can be used to control a BMI.

          Related collections

          Most cited references34

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A review of classification algorithms for EEG-based brain–computer interfaces

          In this paper we review classification algorithms used to design brain-computer interface (BCI) systems based on electroencephalography (EEG). We briefly present the commonly employed algorithms and describe their critical properties. Based on the literature, we compare them in terms of performance and provide guidelines to choose the suitable classification algorithm(s) for a specific BCI.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The ten-twenty electrode system of the International Federation. The International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              fNIRS-based brain-computer interfaces: a review

              A brain-computer interface (BCI) is a communication system that allows the use of brain activity to control computers or other external devices. It can, by bypassing the peripheral nervous system, provide a means of communication for people suffering from severe motor disabilities or in a persistent vegetative state. In this paper, brain-signal generation tasks, noise removal methods, feature extraction/selection schemes, and classification techniques for fNIRS-based BCI are reviewed. The most common brain areas for fNIRS BCI are the primary motor cortex and the prefrontal cortex. In relation to the motor cortex, motor imagery tasks were preferred to motor execution tasks since possible proprioceptive feedback could be avoided. In relation to the prefrontal cortex, fNIRS showed a significant advantage due to no hair in detecting the cognitive tasks like mental arithmetic, music imagery, emotion induction, etc. In removing physiological noise in fNIRS data, band-pass filtering was mostly used. However, more advanced techniques like adaptive filtering, independent component analysis (ICA), multi optodes arrangement, etc. are being pursued to overcome the problem that a band-pass filter cannot be used when both brain and physiological signals occur within a close band. In extracting features related to the desired brain signal, the mean, variance, peak value, slope, skewness, and kurtosis of the noised-removed hemodynamic response were used. For classification, the linear discriminant analysis method provided simple but good performance among others: support vector machine (SVM), hidden Markov model (HMM), artificial neural network, etc. fNIRS will be more widely used to monitor the occurrence of neuro-plasticity after neuro-rehabilitation and neuro-stimulation. Technical breakthroughs in the future are expected via bundled-type probes, hybrid EEG-fNIRS BCI, and through the detection of initial dips.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Hum Neurosci
                Front Hum Neurosci
                Front. Hum. Neurosci.
                Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1662-5161
                22 February 2019
                2019
                : 13
                : 63
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Department of Information and Communications Engineering, Tokyo Institute of Technology , Yokohama, Japan
                [2] 2Institute of Innovative Research, Tokyo Institute of Technology , Yokohama, Japan
                [3] 3Precursory Research for Embryonic Science and Technology (PRESTO), Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST) , Saitama, Japan
                Author notes

                Edited by: Felix Blankenburg, Freie Universität Berlin, Germany

                Reviewed by: Andrés Úbeda, University of Alicante, Spain; Keum-Shik Hong, Pusan National University, South Korea; Muhammad Jawad Khan, National University of Sciences and Technology, Pakistan

                *Correspondence: Yasuharu Koike koike@ 123456pi.titech.ac.jp
                Article
                10.3389/fnhum.2019.00063
                6395380
                c6b3e27b-be8a-4727-a6b1-ec12118a5c38
                Copyright © 2019 Kim, Yoshimura and Koike.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 03 August 2018
                : 05 February 2019
                Page count
                Figures: 5, Tables: 4, Equations: 0, References: 42, Pages: 10, Words: 6629
                Categories
                Neuroscience
                Original Research

                Neurosciences
                brain-machine interface (bmi),electroencephalography (eeg),independent component analysis,classification,premovement

                Comments

                Comment on this article