14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      What is the place of internal urethrotomy in the treatment of urethral stricture disease?

      Nature clinical practice. Urology
      Algorithms, Humans, Recurrence, Risk Factors, Urethra, surgery, Urethral Stricture, Urologic Surgical Procedures, methods

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          As a treatment for male urethral stricture, internal urethrotomy (IU) has the advantages of ease, simplicity, speed and short convalescence. Various modifications of the single cold-knife incision in the 12 o'clock position have been proposed, but there are no prospective, randomized studies to prove their claims of greater efficacy. IU can be performed as an outpatient procedure using local anesthesia, with an indwelling silicone catheter for 3 days after the procedure. Complications of IU are usually minor, including infection and hemorrhage. The reported success rate of IU varies, mainly because of differences in the definition of success and the duration of follow-up. Strictures can recur, usually within 3-12 months of IU. There are several known risk factors for recurrence: a previous IU, penile and membranous strictures, long (>2 cm) and multiple strictures, untreated perioperative urinary infection and extensive periurethral spongiofibrosis. Repeated IU might be useful in patients who have a stricture recurrence more than 6 months after the initial procedure, but repeat IU offers no long-term cure after a third IU, or if a stricture recurs within 3 months of the first IU. Such patients should be offered urethroplasty. Repeated IU followed by long-term self-dilation is an alternative option for men with severe comorbidity and limited life expectancy, or those who have failed previous urethroplasty. Overall, IU has a lower success rate (+/-60%) than urethroplasty (+/-80-90%), but if used for selected strictures, the success rate of IU could approach that of urethroplasty.

          Related collections

          Most cited references54

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Treatment of male urethral strictures: is repeated dilation or internal urethrotomy useful?

          We evaluate the efficacy of repeated dilation or urethrotomy as treatment of male urethral strictures. Between January 1991 and January 1994, 210 men with proved urethral strictures were prospectively randomized to undergo filiform dilation (106) or internal urethrotomy (104). Followup was scheduled at 3, 6, 9, 12, 24, 36 and 48 months. Dilation or internal urethrotomy was repeated at the first and second stricture recurrence. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate survivor function for the treatment methods (survival time being the time to first stricture recurrence) and the log rank test was used to compare the efficacy of different treatments. Followup (mean 24 months, range 2 to 63) was available in 163 patients (78%). After a single dilation or urethrotomy not followed by re-stricturing at 3 months, the estimated stricture-free rate was 55 to 60% at 24 months and 50 to 60% at 48 months. After a second dilation or urethrotomy for stricture recurrence at 3 months the stricture-free rate was 30 to 50% at 24 months and 0 to 40% at 48 months. After a third dilation or urethrotomy for stricture recurrence at 3 and 6 months the stricture-free rate at 24 months was 0 (p <0.0001). Dilation and internal urethrotomy are useful in a select group (approximately 70% of all patients) who are stricture-free at 3 months, and of whom 50 to 60% will remain stricture-free up to 48 months. A second dilation or urethrotomy for early stricture recurrence (at 3 months) is of limited value in the short term (24 months) but of no value in the long term (48 months), whereas a third repeated dilation or urethrotomy is of no value.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Internal urethrotomy in the management of anterior urethral strictures: long-term followup.

            We evaluated the long-term results of internal urethrotomy for anterior urethral strictures. Between 1975 and 1990, 224 patients underwent internal urethrotomy for anterior urethral strictures. Median followup was 98 months (range 60 to 216). The recurrence rate after 1 urethrotomy was 68% overall, and 58% for bulbar, 84% for penile and 89% for penile bulbar urethral strictures. Repeated urethrotomies did not improve the success rate. Prognostic characteristics of bulbar urethral strictures associated with good results included single or primary strictures, length shorter than 10 mm. and caliber wider than 15F. Preoperative infection and etiology of the strictures did not correlate with results. Multiple urethrotomies achieve only temporary improvement and can be compared to repeated dilations. Alternative treatments should be considered for penile strictures and after failure of initial urethrotomy.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Repeat urethrotomy and dilation for the treatment of urethral stricture are neither clinically effective nor cost-effective.

              We developed an algorithm for the management of urethral stricture based on cost-effectiveness. United Kingdom medical and hospital costs associated with the current management of urethral stricture were calculated using private medical insurance schedules of reimbursement and clean intermittent self-catheterization supply costs. These costs were applied to 126 new patients treated endoscopically for urethral stricture in a general urological setting between January 1, 1991 and December 31, 1999. Treatment failure was defined as recurrent symptomatic stricture requiring further operative intervention following initial intervention. Mean followup available was 25 months (range 1 to 132). The costs were urethrotomy/urethral dilation 2,250.00 pounds sterling (3,375.00 dollars, ratio 1.00), simple 1-stage urethroplasty 5,015.00 pounds sterling (7,522.50 dollars, ratio 2.23), complex 1-stage urethroplasty 5,335.00 pounds sterling (8,002.50 dollars, ratio 2.37) and 2-stage urethroplasty 10,370 pounds sterling (15,555.00 dollars, ratio 4.61). Of the 126 patients assessed 60 (47.6%) required more than 1 endoscopic retreatments (mean 3.13 each), 50 performed biweekly clean intermittent self-catheterization and 7 underwent urethroplasty during followup. The total cost per patient for all 126 patients for stricture treatment during followup was 6,113 pounds sterling (9,170 dollars). This cost was calculated by multiplying procedure cost by the number of procedures performed. A strategy of urethrotomy or urethral dilation as first line treatment, followed by urethroplasty for recurrence yielded a total cost per patient of 5,866 pounds sterling (8,799 dollars). A strategy of initial urethrotomy or urethral dilation followed by urethroplasty in patients with recurrent stricture proves to be the most cost-effective strategy. This financially based strategy concurs with evidence based best practice for urethral stricture management.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                16474597
                10.1038/ncpuro0320

                Chemistry
                Algorithms,Humans,Recurrence,Risk Factors,Urethra,surgery,Urethral Stricture,Urologic Surgical Procedures,methods

                Comments

                Comment on this article