13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      System Integrated Digital Empowering and teleRehabilitation to promote patient Activation and well-Being in chronic disabilities: A usability and acceptability study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          Telerehabilitation systems represent a promising way for the management of chronic disability, delivering technology-enabled rehabilitation outside the hospital setting. However, usability and acceptability assessment with users represents a critical starting point when using digital healthcare solutions. This study aims at evaluating the user experience with a Telerehabilitation system (SIDERA B) from the end-user side.

          Methods

          SIDERA B consists of an asynchronous delivery of rehabilitation activities through multimedia digital contents and tele-monitoring of vital parameters with technological devices for individualized, home-based management of chronic conditions. Usability (with the System Usability Scale, SUS) and acceptability (using the Technology Acceptance Model, TAM - and The Service User Technology Acceptance Questionnaire, SUTAQ) data were analyzed from the dataset of the SIDERA B project ( N = 112 patients with Chronic Heart Failure, Parkinson's Disease and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease). The possible influence of five external factors (i.e., technological expertise, education, sex, age, and level of disability) on TAM domains was tested using Spearman's Correlation analysis.

          Results

          Results showed a satisfactory level of technological usability (SUS Median = 77.5) and good scores in usability and learnability SUS subdomains (mean scores > 2.5). Regarding technological acceptability, participants showed high scores (Median > 4) in “Behavioral Intention”, “Perceived Usefulness”, and “Perceived Ease of Use” TAM domains. Finally, results from the SUTAQ scale highlighted that the SIDERA B system obtained optimal scores in all domains, especially in “Increased accessibility,” “Care personnel concerns,” and “Satisfaction.” Age (rho = −0.291, p = 0.002) and disability level (WHODAS Total score: rho = −0.218, p = 0.021) were the two external factors inversely associated with the Perceived Ease of Use.

          Discussion

          The age of digital transformation requires everyone to understand, accept and master the changes affecting modern-day healthcare. The usability and acceptability of the SIDERA B system were high across all end-users, despite the medium-low level of the technological expertise of the sample. These findings support the efficiency and the suitability of these digital solutions in the modern digital age transition of rehabilitation from inside to outside the clinic.

          Related collections

          Most cited references45

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              MDS clinical diagnostic criteria for Parkinson's disease.

              This document presents the Movement Disorder Society Clinical Diagnostic Criteria for Parkinson's disease (PD). The Movement Disorder Society PD Criteria are intended for use in clinical research but also may be used to guide clinical diagnosis. The benchmark for these criteria is expert clinical diagnosis; the criteria aim to systematize the diagnostic process, to make it reproducible across centers and applicable by clinicians with less expertise in PD diagnosis. Although motor abnormalities remain central, increasing recognition has been given to nonmotor manifestations; these are incorporated into both the current criteria and particularly into separate criteria for prodromal PD. Similar to previous criteria, the Movement Disorder Society PD Criteria retain motor parkinsonism as the core feature of the disease, defined as bradykinesia plus rest tremor or rigidity. Explicit instructions for defining these cardinal features are included. After documentation of parkinsonism, determination of PD as the cause of parkinsonism relies on three categories of diagnostic features: absolute exclusion criteria (which rule out PD), red flags (which must be counterbalanced by additional supportive criteria to allow diagnosis of PD), and supportive criteria (positive features that increase confidence of the PD diagnosis). Two levels of certainty are delineated: clinically established PD (maximizing specificity at the expense of reduced sensitivity) and probable PD (which balances sensitivity and specificity). The Movement Disorder Society criteria retain elements proven valuable in previous criteria and omit aspects that are no longer justified, thereby encapsulating diagnosis according to current knowledge. As understanding of PD expands, the Movement Disorder Society criteria will need continuous revision to accommodate these advances.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Public Health
                Front Public Health
                Front. Public Health
                Frontiers in Public Health
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                2296-2565
                28 March 2023
                2023
                : 11
                : 1154481
                Affiliations
                [1] 1IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi ONLUS , Milan, Italy
                [2] 2School of Industrial Engineering and Healthcare Datascience LAB, LIUC-Università Carlo Cattaneo , Castellanza, VA, Italy
                [3] 3Department of Human Sciences for Education, Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca , Milan, Italy
                Author notes

                Edited by: Marco Sacco, National Research Council (CNR), Italy

                Reviewed by: Felice Festa, University of Studies G. d'Annunzio Chieti and Pescara, Italy; Kerstin Denecke, Bern University of Applied Sciences, Switzerland

                *Correspondence: Francesca Borgnis fborgnis@ 123456dongnocchi.it

                This article was submitted to Digital Public Health, a section of the journal Frontiers in Public Health

                Article
                10.3389/fpubh.2023.1154481
                10214955
                37250091
                c70cb39b-9b60-4931-8b2b-9c1c31d98cf8
                Copyright © 2023 Rossetto, Borgnis, Isernia, Foglia, Garagiola, Realdon and Baglio.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 30 January 2023
                : 08 March 2023
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 5, Equations: 0, References: 46, Pages: 11, Words: 7449
                Funding
                The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and publication of this article: Italian Ministry of Health (Ricerca-Corrente program 2022–2024) and Lombardy Region (Announcement POR-FESR 2014–2020—Azione I.1.B.1.3), within the project named SIDERA B Sistema Integrato DomiciliarE e Riabilitazione Assistita al Benessere.
                Categories
                Public Health
                Original Research

                ehealth,telerehabilitation,usability,acceptability,chronic disability,parkinson's disease,chronic obstructive pulmonary disease,chronic heart failure

                Comments

                Comment on this article