2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      New York City greenhouse gas emissions estimated with inverse modeling of aircraft measurements

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Cities are greenhouse gas emission hot spots, making them targets for emission reduction policies. Effective emission reduction policies must be supported by accurate and transparent emissions accounting. Top-down approaches to emissions estimation, based on atmospheric greenhouse gas measurements, are an important and complementary tool to assess, improve, and update the emission inventories on which policy decisions are based and assessed. In this study, we present results from 9 research flights measuring CO2 and CH4 around New York City during the nongrowing seasons of 2018–2020. We used an ensemble of dispersion model runs in a Bayesian inverse modeling framework to derive campaign-average posterior emission estimates for the New York–Newark, NJ, urban area of (125 ± 39) kmol CO2 s–1 and (0.62 ± 0.19) kmol CH4 s–1 (reported as mean ± 1σ variability across the nine flights). We also derived emission estimates of (45 ± 18) kmol CO2 s–1 and (0.20 ± 0.07) kmol CH4 s–1 for the 5 boroughs of New York City. These emission rates, among the first top-down estimates for New York City, are consistent with inventory estimates for CO2 but are 2.4 times larger than the gridded EPA CH4 inventory, consistent with previous work suggesting CH4 emissions from cities throughout the northeast United States are currently underestimated.

          Related collections

          Most cited references47

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          NOAA’s HYSPLIT Atmospheric Transport and Dispersion Modeling System

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            A near-field tool for simulating the upstream influence of atmospheric observations: The Stochastic Time-Inverted Lagrangian Transport (STILT) model

            J. Lin (2003)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found
              Is Open Access

              The Open-source Data Inventory for Anthropogenic CO<sub>2</sub>, version 2016 (ODIAC2016): a global monthly fossil fuel CO<sub>2</sub> gridded emissions data product for tracer transport simulations and surface flux inversions

              Abstract. The Open-source Data Inventory for Anthropogenic CO 2 (ODIAC) is a global high-spatial-resolution gridded emissions data product that distributes carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) emissions from fossil fuel combustion. The emissions spatial distributions are estimated at a 1 × 1 km spatial resolution over land using power plant profiles (emissions intensity and geographical location) and satellite-observed nighttime lights. This paper describes the year 2016 version of the ODIAC emissions data product (ODIAC2016) and presents analyses that help guide data users, especially for atmospheric CO 2 tracer transport simulations and flux inversion analysis. Since the original publication in 2011, we have made modifications to our emissions modeling framework in order to deliver a comprehensive global gridded emissions data product. Major changes from the 2011 publication are (1) the use of emissions estimates made by the Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center (CDIAC) at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) by fuel type (solid, liquid, gas, cement manufacturing, gas flaring, and international aviation and marine bunkers); (2) the use of multiple spatial emissions proxies by fuel type such as (a) nighttime light data specific to gas flaring and (b) ship/aircraft fleet tracks; and (3) the inclusion of emissions temporal variations. Using global fuel consumption data, we extrapolated the CDIAC emissions estimates for the recent years and produced the ODIAC2016 emissions data product that covers 2000–2015. Our emissions data can be viewed as an extended version of CDIAC gridded emissions data product, which should allow data users to impose global fossil fuel emissions in a more comprehensive manner than the original CDIAC product. Our new emissions modeling framework allows us to produce future versions of the ODIAC emissions data product with a timely update. Such capability has become more significant given the CDIAC/ORNL's shutdown. The ODIAC data product could play an important role in supporting carbon cycle science, especially modeling studies with space-based CO 2 data collected in near real time by ongoing carbon observing missions such as the Japanese Greenhouse gases Observing SATellite (GOSAT), NASA's Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 (OCO-2), and upcoming future missions. The ODIAC emissions data product including the latest version of the ODIAC emissions data (ODIAC2017, 2000–2016) is distributed from http://db.cger.nies.go.jp/dataset/ODIAC/ with a DOI ( https://doi.org/10.17595/20170411.001 ).
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene
                University of California Press
                2325-1026
                January 19 2022
                2022
                January 19 2022
                2022
                : 10
                : 1
                Affiliations
                [1 ]School of Marine and Atmospheric Sciences, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA
                [2 ]Current address: School of Chemistry, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
                [3 ]National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, USA
                [4 ]Department of Chemistry, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA
                [5 ]Current address: Bristol Myers Squibb, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
                [6 ]School of Aviation and Transportation Technology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA
                [7 ]Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA
                [8 ]Air Resources Laboratory, NOAA, College Park, MD, USA
                [9 ]Department of Earth and Environment, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA
                [10 ]Current address: Metropolitan Area Planning Council, Boston, MA, USA
                [11 ]School of Informatics, Computing and Cyber Systems, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, USA
                [12 ]Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands, CA, USA
                Article
                10.1525/elementa.2021.00082
                c72f80a0-4665-48e3-8a26-e2662188cd1e
                © 2022

                http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article