20
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Preventing occupational stress in healthcare workers

      1 , 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5
      Cochrane Work Group
      Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
      Wiley

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Healthcare workers can suffer from occupational stress as a result of lack of skills, organisational factors, and low social support at work. This may lead to distress, burnout and psychosomatic problems, and deterioration in quality of life and service provision.

          Related collections

          Most cited references126

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The benefits of interventions for work-related stress.

          This quantitative meta-analysis sought to determine the effectiveness of occupational stress-reducing interventions and the populations for which such interventions are most beneficial. Forty-eight experimental studies (n = 3736) were included in the analysis. Four intervention types were distinguished: cognitive-behavioral interventions, relaxation techniques, multimodal programs, and organization-focused interventions. A small but significant overall effect was found. A moderate effect was found for cognitive-behavioral interventions and multimodal interventions, and a small effect was found for relaxation techniques. The effect size for organization-focused interventions was nonsignificant. Effects were most pronounced on the following outcome categories: complaints, psychologic resources and responses, and perceived quality of work life. Stress management interventions are effective. Cognitive-behavioral interventions are more effective than the other intervention types.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Burnout prevention: a review of intervention programs.

            To evaluate the effectiveness of intervention programs at the workplace or elsewhere aimed at preventing burnout, a leading cause of work related mental health impairment. A systematic search of burnout intervention studies was conducted in the databases Medline, PsycINFO and PSYNDEX from 1995 to 2007. Data was also extracted from papers found through a hand search. A total of 25 primary intervention studies were reviewed. Seventeen (68%) were person-directed interventions, 2 (8%) were organization-directed and 6 (24%) were a combination of both interventions types. Eighty percent of all programs led to a reduction in burnout. Person-directed interventions reduced burnout in the short term (6 months or less), while a combination of both person- and organization-directed interventions had longer lasting positive effects (12 months and over). In all cases, positive intervention effects diminished in the course of time. Intervention programs against burnout are beneficial and can be enhanced with refresher courses. Better implemented programs including both person- and organization-directed measures should be offered and evaluated. A combination of both intervention types should be further investigated, optimized and practiced. Institutions should recognize the need for and make burnout intervention programs available to employees. Copyright 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Validation of a single-item measure of burnout against the Maslach Burnout Inventory among physicians

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
                Wiley
                14651858
                April 07 2015
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Finnish Institute of Occupational Health; Cochrane Occupational Safety and Health Review Group; PO Box 310 Kuopio Finland 70101
                [2 ]Corporacio Sanitaria Parc Tauli de Sabadell; Prevention Service; Parc Tauli s/n Sabadell Catalonia Spain 08208
                [3 ]Pompeu Fabra University; CiSAL - Centre for Occupational Health; PRBB Buildinng Dr Aiguader, 88 Barcelona Spain 08003
                [4 ]Parc de Salut MAR; Occupational Health Service; Passeig Marítim de la Barceloneta, 25-29 Barcelona Spain 08003
                [5 ]CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP); () Spain
                Article
                10.1002/14651858.CD002892.pub5
                6718215
                25847433
                c87ffde9-f715-4b35-ab80-c9ccb46733ee
                © 2015
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article