66
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    4
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Integrated care in Norway: the state of affairs years after regulation by law

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          A mandatory multidisciplinary plan for individual care, the ‘Individual care Plan’, was introduced by law in Norway in 2001. The regulation was established to meet the need for improved efficiency and quality of health and social services, and to increase patient involvement. The plan was intended for patients with long-term and complex needs for coordinated care. The aim of this study was to elaborate on knowledge of such planning processes in Norwegian municipalities.

          Method

          A piloted questionnaire was sent to 92 randomly selected municipalities in 2005–2006, addressing local organization and participation in the work with individual care plans. Local political governance, size of the population, funds available for health care, and problems related to living conditions were indicators for analysing the extent to which the individual care plan was used five years after the regulation was introduced.

          Results

          Our results showed that 0.5% as opposed to an expected 3% of the population had an individual care plan. This was independent of the political, social and financial situation in the municipalities or the way the planning process had been carried out. The planning process was mostly taken care of by local health and social care professionals, rather than by hospital staff and general practitioners.

          Discussion and conclusion

          The low number of care plans and the oblique responsibility among professionals for planning showed that the objectives of the national initiative had not been achieved. More research is needed to determine the reasons for this lack of success and to contribute to solutions for improved multidisciplinary cooperation.

          Related collections

          Most cited references43

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Integrated care programmes for chronically ill patients: a review of systematic reviews.

          To investigate effectiveness, definitions, and components of integrated care programmes for chronically ill patients on the basis of systematic reviews. Literature review from January 1996 to May 2004. Definitions and components of integrated care programmes and all effects reported on the quality of care. Searches in the Medline and Cochrane databases identified 13 systematic reviews of integrated care programmes for chronically ill patients. Despite considerable heterogeneity in interventions, patient populations, and processes and outcomes of care, integrated care programmes seemed to have positive effects on the quality of patient care. No consistent definitions were present for the management of patients with chronic illnesses. In all the reviews the aims of integrated care programmes were very similar, namely reducing fragmentation and improving continuity and coordination of care, but the focus and content of the programmes differed widely. The most common components of integrated care programmes were self-management support and patient education, often combined with structured clinical follow-up and case management; a multidisciplinary patient care team; multidisciplinary clinical pathways and feedback, reminders, and education for professionals. Integrated care programmes seemed to have positive effects on the quality of care. However, integrated care programmes have widely varying definitions and components and failure to recognize these variations leads to inappropriate conclusions about the effectiveness of these programmes and to inappropriate application of research results. To compare programmes and better understand the (cost) effectiveness of the programmes, consistent definitions must be used and component interventions must be well described.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Book: not found

            The system of professions: An essay on the division of expert labor

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Developing integrated health and social care services for older persons in Europe

              Abstract Purpose This paper is to distribute first results of the EU Fifth Framework Project ‘Providing integrated health and social care for older persons—issues, problems and solutions’ (PROCARE—http://www.euro.centre.org/procare/). The project's first phase was to identify different approaches to integration as well as structural, organisational, economic and social-cultural factors and actors that constitute integrated and sustainable care systems. It also served to retrieve a number of experiences, model ways of working and demonstration projects in the participating countries which are currently being analysed in order to learn from success—or failure—and to develop policy recommendations for the local, national and European level. Theory The paper draws on existing definitions of integrated care in various countries and by various scholars. Given the context of an international comparative study it tries to avoid providing a single, ready-made definition but underlines the role of social care as part and parcel of this type of integrated care in the participating countries. Methods The paper is based on national reports from researchers representing ten organisations (university institutes, consultancy firms, research institutes, the public and the NGO sector) from 9 European countries: Austria, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Italy, the Netherlands, and the UK. Literature reviews made intensive use of grey literature and evaluation studies in the context of at least five model ways of working in each country. Results As a result of the cross-national overview an attempt to classify different approaches and definitions is made and indicators of relative importance of the different instruments used in integrating health and social care services are provided. Conclusions The cross-national overview shows that issues concerning co-ordination and integration of services are high on the agenda in most countries. Depending on the state of service development, various approaches and instruments can be observed. Different national frameworks, in particular with respect to financing and organisation, systemic development, professionalisation and professional cultures, basic societal values (family ethics), and political approaches have to be taken into account during the second phase of PROCARE during which transversal and transnational analysis will be undertaken based on an in-depth analysis of two model ways of working in each country. Discussion Far from a European vision concerning integrated care, national health and social care systems remain—at best—loosely coupled systems that are facing increasing difficulties, given the current challenges, in particular in long-term care for older persons: increasing marketisation, lack of managerial knowledge (co-operation, co-ordination), shortage of care workers and a general trend towards down-sizing of social care services continue to hamper the first tentative pathways towards integrated care systems.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Norwegian Centre of Electronic Health Records (NSEP), Faculty of Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Medisinsk teknisk forskningssenter [Research Centre of Medical Technology], NO-7489 Trondheim, Norway
                Faculty of Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Medisinsk teknisk forskningssenter [Research Centre of Medical Technology], NO-7489 Trondheim, Norway
                Role: Professor,
                Faculty of Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Medisinsk teknisk forskningssenter [Research Centre of Medical Technology], NO-7489 Trondheim, Norway
                Role: Associate Professor,
                Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Health and Society, Department of Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1153 Blindern, NO-0318 Oslo, Norway
                Role: Associate Professor,
                Aalborg University, Department of Health Science and Technology, and Virtual Center of Health Informatics, Fredrik BajersVej 7D, DK-9220 Aalborg East, Denmark
                Journal
                Int J Integr Care
                IJIC
                International Journal of Integrated Care
                Igitur, Utrecht Publishing & Archiving (Utrecht, The Netherlands )
                1568-4156
                Jan-Mar 2011
                26 January 2011
                : 11
                : e001
                Affiliations
                Norwegian Centre of Electronic Health Records (NSEP), Faculty of Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Medisinsk teknisk forskningssenter [Research Centre of Medical Technology], NO-7489 Trondheim, Norway
                Faculty of Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Medisinsk teknisk forskningssenter [Research Centre of Medical Technology], NO-7489 Trondheim, Norway
                Faculty of Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Medisinsk teknisk forskningssenter [Research Centre of Medical Technology], NO-7489 Trondheim, Norway
                Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Health and Society, Department of Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1153 Blindern, NO-0318 Oslo, Norway
                Aalborg University, Department of Health Science and Technology, and Virtual Center of Health Informatics, Fredrik BajersVej 7D, DK-9220 Aalborg East, Denmark
                Author notes
                Correspondence to: Jorunn Bjerkan, NSEP, Research Centre of Medical Technology, NO-7489 Trondheim, Norway, Phone: +47 48 60 66 79, E-mail: jorunn.bjerkan@ 123456NTNU.no
                Article
                ijic2011001
                10.5334/ijic.530
                3107091
                21637705
                c88fbadf-1d95-4ec0-8870-9073fa61e366
                Copyright 2011, International Journal of Integrated Care (IJIC)
                History
                Categories
                Research and Theory

                Health & Social care
                patient centred care,health planning,individual care plan,primary health care,patient care management,health policy

                Comments

                Comment on this article