3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Selection on sperm size in response to promiscuity and variation in female sperm storage organs

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Sperm cells are exceptionally morphologically diverse across taxa. However, morphology can be quite uniform within species, particularly for species where females copulate with many males per reproductive bout. Strong sexual selection in these promiscuous species is widely hypothesized to reduce intraspecific sperm variation. Conversely, we hypothesize that intraspecific sperm size variation may be maintained by high among‐female variation in the size of sperm storage organs, assuming that paternity success improves when sperm are compatible in size with the sperm storage organ. We use individual‐based simulations and an analytical model to evaluate how selection on sperm size depends on promiscuity level and variation in sperm storage organ size (hereafter, female preference variation). Simulations of high promiscuity (10 mates per female) showed stabilizing selection on sperm when female preference variation was low, and disruptive selection when female preference variation was high, consistent with the analytical model results. With low promiscuity (2–3 mates per female), selection on sperm was stabilizing for all levels of female preference variation in the simulations, contrasting with the analytical model. Promiscuity level, or mate sampling, thus has a strong impact on the selection resulting from female preferences. Furthermore, when promiscuity is low, disruptive selection on male traits will occur under much more limited circumstances (i.e. only with higher among‐female variation) than many previous models suggest. Variation in female sperm storage organs likely has strong implications for intraspecific sperm variation in highly promiscuous species, but likely does not explain differences in intraspecific sperm variation for less promiscuous taxa.

          Abstract

          We modelled populations where among‐female variation in sperm storage organ (SSO) size (red) was relatively high or low, compared to among‐male variation in sperm size (blue). The form of selection on sperm depended on the interaction between among‐female SSO variation and female promiscuity level (i.e. number of sperm competitors).

          Related collections

          Most cited references117

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Welcome to the Tidyverse

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            SPERM COMPETITION AND ITS EVOLUTIONARY CONSEQUENCES IN THE INSECTS

            Biological Reviews, 45(4), 525-567
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              The Measurement of Selection on Correlated Characters

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                becky.cramer@nhm.uio.no
                Journal
                J Evol Biol
                J Evol Biol
                10.1111/(ISSN)1420-9101
                JEB
                Journal of Evolutionary Biology
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                1010-061X
                1420-9101
                10 November 2022
                January 2023
                : 36
                : 1 ( doiID: 10.1111/jeb.v36.1 )
                : 131-143
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Sex and Evolution Research Group, Natural History Museum University of Oslo Oslo Norway
                [ 2 ] Carnegie Mellon University in Qatar Doha Qatar
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Emily R. A. Cramer, Sex and Evolution Research Group, Natural History Museum, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.

                Email: becky.cramer@ 123456nhm.uio.no

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1443-9255
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3928-9748
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9172-9985
                Article
                JEB14120 JEB-2022-00112.R2
                10.1111/jeb.14120
                10100110
                36357998
                c96aedca-a440-483e-817a-49b42e582f90
                © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Evolutionary Biology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society for Evolutionary Biology.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 30 September 2022
                : 11 April 2022
                : 05 October 2022
                Page count
                Figures: 4, Tables: 0, Pages: 13, Words: 9854
                Funding
                Funded by: Norges Forskningsråd , doi 10.13039/501100005416;
                Award ID: 301592
                Categories
                Research Article
                Research Articles
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                January 2023
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.2.7 mode:remove_FC converted:13.04.2023

                Evolutionary Biology
                cryptic female choice,mate choice,sperm length,sperm morphology,sperm storage
                Evolutionary Biology
                cryptic female choice, mate choice, sperm length, sperm morphology, sperm storage

                Comments

                Comment on this article