4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Electrophysiological Correlates of an Alcohol-Cued Go/NoGo Task: A Dual-Process Approach to Binge Drinking in University Students

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Binge drinking is a common pattern of alcohol consumption in adolescence and youth. Neurocognitive dual-process models attribute substance use disorders and risk behaviours during adolescence to an imbalance between an overactivated affective-automatic system (involved in motivational and affective processing) and a reflective system (involved in cognitive inhibitory control). The aim of the present study was to investigate at the electrophysiological level the degree to which the motivational value of alcohol-related stimuli modulates the inhibition of a prepotent response in binge drinkers. First-year university students ( n = 151, 54 % females) classified as binge drinkers ( n = 71, ≥6 binge drinking episodes, defined as 5/7 standard drinks per occasion in the last 180 days) and controls ( n = 80, <6 binge drinking episodes in the last 180 days) performed a beverage Go/NoGo task (pictures of alcoholic and nonalcoholic drinks were presented according to the condition as Go or NoGo stimuli; Go probability = 0.75) during event-related potential recording. In binge drinkers but not controls, the amplitude of the anterior N2-NoGo was larger in response to nonalcohol than in response to alcohol pictures. No behavioural difference in task performance was observed. In terms of dual-process models, binge drinkers may require increased activation to monitor conflict in order to compensate for overactivation of the affective-automatic system caused by alcohol-related bias.

          Related collections

          Most cited references63

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Attentional bias in addictive behaviors: a review of its development, causes, and consequences.

          A wealth of research from the past two decades shows that addictive behaviors are characterized by attentional biases for substance-related stimuli. We review the relevant evidence and present an integration of existing theoretical models to explain the development, causes, and consequences of addiction-related attentional biases. We suggest that through classical conditioning, substance-related stimuli elicit the expectancy of substance availability, and this expectancy causes both attentional bias for substance-related stimuli and subjective craving. Furthermore, attentional bias and craving have a mutual excitatory relationship such that increases in one lead to increases in the other, a process that is likely to result in substance self-administration. Cognitive avoidance strategies, impulsivity, and impaired inhibitory control appear to influence the strength of attentional biases and subjective craving. However, some measures of attentional bias, particularly the addiction Stroop, might reflect multiple underlying processes, so results need to be interpreted cautiously. We make several predictions that require testing in future research, and we discuss implications for the treatment of addictive behaviors.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Electrophysiological correlates of anterior cingulate function in a go/no-go task: effects of response conflict and trial type frequency.

            Neuroimaging and computational modeling studies have led to the suggestion that response conflict monitoring by the anterior cingulate cortex plays a key role in cognitive control. For example, response conflict is high when a response must be withheld (no-go) in contexts in which there is a prepotent tendency to make an overt (go) response. An event-related brain potential (ERP) component, the N2, is more pronounced on no-go than on go trials and was previously thought to reflect the need to inhibit the go response. However, the N2 may instead reflect the high degree of response conflict on no-go trials. If so, an N2 should also be apparent when subjects make a go response in conditions in which no-go events are more common. To test this hypothesis, we collected high-density ERP data from subjects performing a go/no-go task, in which the relative frequency of go versus no-go stimuli was varied. Consistent with our hypothesis, an N2 was apparent on both go and no-go trials and showed the properties expected of an ERP measure of conflict detection on correct trials: (1) It was enhanced for low-frequency stimuli, irrespective of whether these stimuli were associated with generating or suppressing a response, and (2) it was localized to the anterior cingulate cortex. This suggests that previous conceptions of the no-go N2 as indexing response inhibition may be in need of revision. Instead, the results are consistent with the view that the N2 in go/no-go tasks reflects conflict arising from competition between the execution and the inhibition of a single response.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              The dual systems model: Review, reappraisal, and reaffirmation

              Highlights • Evidence related to the dual systems model of adolescent risk taking is reviewed. • The review encompasses both the psychological and neuroimaging literatures. • Recent findings (since 2008) generally support the dual systems model. • Recommendations are made for future research directions.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Int J Environ Res Public Health
                Int J Environ Res Public Health
                ijerph
                International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
                MDPI
                1661-7827
                1660-4601
                18 November 2019
                November 2019
                : 16
                : 22
                : 4550
                Affiliations
                Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychobiology, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, Spain; fernando.cadaveira@ 123456usc.es (F.C.); rocio.folgueira@ 123456usc.es (R.F.-A.); montse.corral@ 123456usc.es (M.C.); rodriguez.holguin@ 123456usc.es (S.R.H.)
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence: javier.blanco@ 123456usc.es ; Tel.: +34-88113915
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4194-680X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6198-1541
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3068-3415
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1502-987X
                Article
                ijerph-16-04550
                10.3390/ijerph16224550
                6888589
                31752082
                c9856a6b-d83c-4fae-8909-e0039fb06fe1
                © 2019 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 10 October 2019
                : 14 November 2019
                Categories
                Article

                Public health
                alcohol consumption,binge drinking,adolescence,dual-process model,response inhibition,neurocognitive,event-related potentials,go/nogo

                Comments

                Comment on this article