Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
30
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      What Pinnipeds Have to Say about Human Speech, Music, and the Evolution of Rhythm

      brief-report

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Research on the evolution of human speech and music benefits from hypotheses and data generated in a number of disciplines. The purpose of this article is to illustrate the high relevance of pinniped research for the study of speech, musical rhythm, and their origins, bridging and complementing current research on primates and birds. We briefly discuss speech, vocal learning, and rhythm from an evolutionary and comparative perspective. We review the current state of the art on pinniped communication and behavior relevant to the evolution of human speech and music, showing interesting parallels to hypotheses on rhythmic behavior in early hominids. We suggest future research directions in terms of species to test and empirical data needed.

          Related collections

          Most cited references99

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          On aims and methods of Ethology

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The placental mammal ancestor and the post-K-Pg radiation of placentals.

            To discover interordinal relationships of living and fossil placental mammals and the time of origin of placentals relative to the Cretaceous-Paleogene (K-Pg) boundary, we scored 4541 phenomic characters de novo for 86 fossil and living species. Combining these data with molecular sequences, we obtained a phylogenetic tree that, when calibrated with fossils, shows that crown clade Placentalia and placental orders originated after the K-Pg boundary. Many nodes discovered using molecular data are upheld, but phenomic signals overturn molecular signals to show Sundatheria (Dermoptera + Scandentia) as the sister taxon of Primates, a close link between Proboscidea (elephants) and Sirenia (sea cows), and the monophyly of echolocating Chiroptera (bats). Our tree suggests that Placentalia first split into Xenarthra and Epitheria; extinct New World species are the oldest members of Afrotheria.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Sensorimotor synchronization: a review of recent research (2006-2012).

              Sensorimotor synchronization (SMS) is the coordination of rhythmic movement with an external rhythm, ranging from finger tapping in time with a metronome to musical ensemble performance. An earlier review (Repp, 2005) covered tapping studies; two additional reviews (Repp, 2006a, b) focused on music performance and on rate limits of SMS, respectively. The present article supplements and extends these earlier reviews by surveying more recent research in what appears to be a burgeoning field. The article comprises four parts, dealing with (1) conventional tapping studies, (2) other forms of moving in synchrony with external rhythms (including dance and nonhuman animals' synchronization abilities), (3) interpersonal synchronization (including musical ensemble performance), and (4) the neuroscience of SMS. It is evident that much new knowledge about SMS has been acquired in the last 7 years.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Neurosci
                Front Neurosci
                Front. Neurosci.
                Frontiers in Neuroscience
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1662-4548
                1662-453X
                20 June 2016
                2016
                : 10
                : 274
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Artificial Intelligence Lab, Vrije Universiteit Brussel Brussels, Belgium
                [2] 2Sensory and Cognitive Ecology, Institute for Biosciences, University of Rostock Rostock, Germany
                [3] 3Department of Cognitive Biology, University of Vienna Vienna, Austria
                [4] 4Chemnitz Zoo Chemnitz, Germany
                [5] 5Basic and Applied NeuroDynamics Lab, Department of Neuropsychology and Psychopharmacology, Maastricht University Maastricht, Netherlands
                [6] 6Department of Neuropsychology, Max-Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences Leipzig, Germany
                [7] 7Department of Animal Behavior, Institute of Biology, Freie Universität Berlin Berlin, Germany
                Author notes

                Edited by: Virginia Penhune, Concordia University, Canada

                Reviewed by: Hugo Merchant, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico; Aniruddh Patel, Tufts University, USA

                *Correspondence: Andrea Ravignani andrea.ravignani@ 123456gmail.com

                This article was submitted to Auditory Cognitive Neuroscience, a section of the journal Frontiers in Neuroscience

                †These authors have contributed equally to this work.

                Article
                10.3389/fnins.2016.00274
                4913109
                27378843
                c9f0e3d5-8e77-449a-82db-656bae3d704f
                Copyright © 2016 Ravignani, Fitch, Hanke, Heinrich, Hurgitsch, Kotz, Scharff, Stoeger and de Boer.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 04 March 2016
                : 31 May 2016
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 2, Equations: 0, References: 123, Pages: 9, Words: 8216
                Categories
                Psychology
                Perspective

                Neurosciences
                evolution of speech,evolution of music,evolution of language,vocal learning,entrainment,timing,synchronization,seal

                Comments

                Comment on this article