Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Evaluation Of The Grey-level Co-occurrence Matrix Method For Land-cover Classification Using Spot Imagery

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references14

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The factor of scale in remote sensing

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Large sample standard errors of kappa and weighted kappa.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A theoretical comparison of texture algorithms.

              An evaluation of the ability of four texture analysis algorithms to perform automatic texture discrimination will be described. The algorithms which will be examined are the spatial gray level dependence method (SGLDM), the gray level run length method (GLRLM), the gray level difference method (GLDM), and the power spectral method (PSM). The evaluation procedure employed does not depend on the set of features used with each algorithm or the pattern recognition scheme. Rather, what is examined is the amount of texturecontext information contained in the spatial gray level dependence matrices, the gray level run length matrices, the gray level difference density functions, and the power spectrum. The comparison will be performed in two steps. First, only Markov generated textures will be considered. The Markov textures employed are similar to the ones used by perceptual psychologist B. Julesz in his investigations of human texture perception. These Markov textures provide a convenient mechanism for generating certain example texture pairs which are important in the analysis process. In the second part of the analysis the results obtained by considering only Markov textures will be extended to all textures which can be represented by translation stationary random fields of order two. This generalization clearly includes a much broader class of textures than Markovian ones. The results obtained indicate that the SGLDM is the most powerful algorithm of the four considered, and that the GLDM is more powerful than the PSM.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing
                IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sensing
                Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
                0196-2892
                July 1990
                July 1990
                : 28
                : 4
                : 513-519
                Article
                10.1109/TGRS.1990.572937
                ca4ed528-0cbb-4edb-a5b4-4dc6c6b7e8f6
                © 1990
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article