25
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Mortality and Morbidity Trends: Is There Compression of Morbidity?

      ,
      The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences
      Oxford University Press (OUP)

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This paper reviews trends in mortality and morbidity to evaluate whether there has been a compression of morbidity. Review of recent research and analysis of recent data for the United States relating mortality change to the length of life without 1 of 4 major diseases or loss of mobility functioning. Mortality declines have slowed down in the United States in recent years, especially for women. The prevalence of disease has increased. Age-specific prevalence of a number of risk factors representing physiological status has stayed relatively constant; where risks decline, increased usage of effective drugs is responsible. Mobility functioning has deteriorated. Length of life with disease and mobility functioning loss has increased between 1998 and 2008. Empirical findings do not support recent compression of morbidity when morbidity is defined as major disease and mobility functioning loss.

          Related collections

          Most cited references56

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Demography. Broken limits to life expectancy.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Lifetime risk for diabetes mellitus in the United States.

            Although diabetes mellitus is one of the most prevalent and costly chronic diseases in the United States, no estimates have been published of individuals' average lifetime risk of developing diabetes. To estimate age-, sex-, and race/ethnicity-specific lifetime risk of diabetes in the cohort born in 2000 in the United States. Data from the National Health Interview Survey (1984-2000) were used to estimate age-, sex-, and race/ethnicity-specific prevalence and incidence in 2000. US Census Bureau data and data from a previous study of diabetes as a cause of death were used to estimate age-, sex-, and race/ethnicity-specific mortality rates for diabetic and nondiabetic populations. Residual (remaining) lifetime risk of diabetes (from birth to 80 years in 1-year intervals), duration with diabetes, and life-years and quality-adjusted life-years lost from diabetes. The estimated lifetime risk of developing diabetes for individuals born in 2000 is 32.8% for males and 38.5% for females. Females have higher residual lifetime risks at all ages. The highest estimated lifetime risk for diabetes is among Hispanics (males, 45.4% and females, 52.5%). Individuals diagnosed as having diabetes have large reductions in life expectancy. For example, we estimate that if an individual is diagnosed at age 40 years, men will lose 11.6 life-years and 18.6 quality-adjusted life-years and women will lose 14.3 life-years and 22.0 quality-adjusted life-years. For individuals born in the United States in 2000, the lifetime probability of being diagnosed with diabetes mellitus is substantial. Primary prevention of diabetes and its complications are important public health priorities.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Cancer Statistics, 2005

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences
                The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences
                Oxford University Press (OUP)
                1079-5014
                1758-5368
                December 14 2010
                January 01 2011
                December 06 2010
                January 01 2011
                : 66B
                : 1
                : 75-86
                Article
                10.1093/geronb/gbq088
                3001754
                21135070
                ca8a4dc3-b3d5-46e1-b5e5-c97d6defff61
                © 2011
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article