Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Combination of Radiological and Clinical Baseline Data for Outcome Prediction of Patients With an Acute Ischemic Stroke

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Accurate prediction of clinical outcome is of utmost importance for choices regarding the endovascular treatment (EVT) of acute stroke. Recent studies on the prediction modeling for stroke focused mostly on clinical characteristics and radiological scores available at baseline. Radiological images are composed of millions of voxels, and a lot of information can be lost when representing this information by a single value. Therefore, in this study we aimed at developing prediction models that take into account the whole imaging data combined with clinical data available at baseline.

          Methods

          We included 3,279 patients from the MR CLEAN Registry; a prospective, observational, multicenter registry of patients with ischemic stroke treated with EVT. We developed two approaches to combine the imaging data with the clinical data. The first approach was based on radiomics features, extracted from 70 atlas regions combined with the clinical data to train machine learning models. For the second approach, we trained 3D deep learning models using the whole images and the clinical data. Models trained with the clinical data only were compared with models trained with the combination of clinical and image data. Finally, we explored feature importance plots for the best models and identified many known variables and image features/brain regions that were relevant in the model decision process.

          Results

          From 3,279 patients included, 1,241 (37%) patients had a good functional outcome [modified Rankin Scale (mRS) ≤ 2] and 1,954 (60%) patients had good reperfusion [modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (eTICI) ≥ 2b]. There was no significant improvement by combining the image data to the clinical data for mRS prediction [mean area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) of 0.81 vs. 0.80] above using the clinical data only, regardless of the approach used. Regarding predicting reperfusion, there was a significant improvement when image and clinical features were combined (mean AUC of 0.54 vs. 0.61), with the highest AUC obtained by the deep learning approach.

          Conclusions

          The combination of radiomics and deep learning image features with clinical data significantly improved the prediction of good reperfusion. The visualization of prediction feature importance showed both known and novel clinical and imaging features with predictive values.

          Related collections

          Most cited references44

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Random Forests

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Book Chapter: not found

            U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Support-vector networks

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Neurol
                Front Neurol
                Front. Neurol.
                Frontiers in Neurology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-2295
                01 April 2022
                2022
                : 13
                : 809343
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Department of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam , Amsterdam, Netherlands
                [2] 2Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam , Amsterdam, Netherlands
                [3] 3Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center , Leiden, Netherlands
                [4] 4CLAIM - Charité Lab for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin , Berlin, Germany
                [5] 5Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center (MC) - University Medical Center , Rotterdam, Netherlands
                [6] 6Department of Neurology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam , Amsterdam, Netherlands
                [7] 7Department of Radiology, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, Maastricht University Medical Center , Maastricht, Netherlands
                [8] 8Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center , Leiden, Netherlands
                [9] 9Centre for Radiology and Endoscopy, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf , Hamburg, Germany
                [10] 10Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam , Amsterdam, Netherlands
                Author notes

                Edited by: Mauricio Reyes, University of Bern, Switzerland

                Reviewed by: Kais Gadhoumi, Duke University, United States; Shouliang Qi, Northeastern University, China

                *Correspondence: Lucas A. Ramos lucas.ramos.amc@ 123456gmail.com

                This article was submitted to Stroke, a section of the journal Frontiers in Neurology

                Article
                10.3389/fneur.2022.809343
                9010547
                35432171
                cb3ac836-ebc8-4eeb-9705-c1d6d7006f64
                Copyright © 2022 Ramos, Os, Hilbert, Olabarriaga, Lugt, Roos, Zwam, Walderveen, Ernst, Zwinderman, Strijkers, Majoie, Wermer and Marquering.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 04 November 2021
                : 08 March 2022
                Page count
                Figures: 8, Tables: 6, Equations: 0, References: 44, Pages: 18, Words: 9295
                Funding
                Funded by: ITEA3, doi 10.13039/501100009077;
                Categories
                Neurology
                Original Research

                Neurology
                ischemia stroke,radiomics,deep learning,data combination,outcome prediction
                Neurology
                ischemia stroke, radiomics, deep learning, data combination, outcome prediction

                Comments

                Comment on this article