3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Textbook outcome for esophageal cancer surgery: an international consensus-based update of a quality measure

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Summary

          Textbook outcome for esophageal cancer surgery is a composite quality measure including 10 short-term surgical outcomes reflecting an uneventful perioperative course. Achieved textbook outcome is associated with improved long-term survival. This study aimed to update the original textbook outcome based on international consensus. Forty-five international expert esophageal cancer surgeons received a personal invitation to evaluate the 10 items in the original textbook outcome for esophageal cancer surgery and to rate 18 additional items divided over seven subcategories for their importance in the updated textbook outcome. Items were included in the updated textbook outcome if ≥80% of the respondents agreed on inclusion. In case multiple items within one subcategory reached ≥80% agreement, only the most inclusive item with the highest agreement rate was included. With a response rate of 80%, 36 expert esophageal cancer surgeons, from 34 hospitals, 16 countries, and 4 continents responded to this international survey. Based on the inclusion criteria, the updated quality indicator ‘textbook outcome for esophageal cancer surgery’ should consist of: tumor-negative resection margins, ≥20 lymph nodes retrieved and examined, no intraoperative complication, no complications Clavien–Dindo ≥III, no ICU/MCU readmission, no readmission related to the surgical procedure, no anastomotic leakage, no hospital stay ≥14 days, and no in-hospital mortality. This study resulted in an international consensus-based update of a quality measure, textbook outcome for esophageal cancer surgery. This updated textbook outcome should be implemented in quality assurance programs for centers performing esophageal cancer surgery, and could standardize quality measures used internationally.

          Related collections

          Most cited references23

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience.

          The lack of consensus on how to define and grade adverse postoperative events has greatly hampered the evaluation of surgical procedures. A new classification of complications, initiated in 1992, was updated 5 years ago. It is based on the type of therapy needed to correct the complication. The principle of the classification was to be simple, reproducible, flexible, and applicable irrespective of the cultural background. The aim of the current study was to critically evaluate this classification from the perspective of its use in the literature, by assessing interobserver variability in grading complex complication scenarios and to correlate the classification grades with patients', nurses', and doctors' perception. Reports from the literature using the classification system were systematically analyzed. Next, 11 scenarios illustrating difficult cases were prepared to develop a consensus on how to rank the various complications. Third, 7 centers from different continents, having routinely used the classification, independently assessed the 11 scenarios. An agreement analysis was performed to test the accuracy and reliability of the classification. Finally, the perception of the severity was tested in patients, nurses, and physicians by presenting 30 scenarios, each illustrating a specific grade of complication. We noted a dramatic increase in the use of the classification in many fields of surgery. About half of the studies used the contracted form, whereas the rest used the full range of grading. Two-thirds of the publications avoided subjective terms such as minor or major complications. The study of 11 difficult cases among various centers revealed a high degree of agreement in identifying and ranking complications (89% agreement), and enabled a better definition of unclear situations. Each grade of complications significantly correlated with the perception by patients, nurses, and physicians (P < 0.05, Kruskal-Wallis test). This 5-year evaluation provides strong evidence that the classification is valid and applicable worldwide in many fields of surgery. No modification in the general principle of classification is warranted in view of the use in ongoing publications and trials. Subjective, inaccurate, or confusing terms such as "minor or major" should be removed from the surgical literature.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            International Consensus on Standardization of Data Collection for Complications Associated With Esophagectomy: Esophagectomy Complications Consensus Group (ECCG).

            Perioperative complications influence long- and short-term outcomes after esophagectomy. The absence of a standardized system for defining and recording complications and quality measures after esophageal resection has meant that there is wide variation in evaluating their impact on these outcomes.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Evaluating the quality of medical care. 1966.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Dis Esophagus
                Dis Esophagus
                dote
                Diseases of the Esophagus
                Oxford University Press
                1120-8694
                1442-2050
                July 2021
                22 March 2021
                22 March 2021
                : 34
                : 7
                : doab011
                Affiliations
                Department of Surgery , Amsterdam UMC , Location AMC, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                Department of Surgery , Amsterdam UMC , Location AMC, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                Department of Surgery , Amsterdam UMC , Location AMC, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                Author notes
                Address correspondence to: Dr Suzanne S. Gisbertz, Department of Surgery, G4-186, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, PO Box 22660, 1100 DD Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Email: s.s.gisbertz@ 123456amsterdamumc.nl
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4821-2806
                Article
                doab011
                10.1093/dote/doab011
                8275976
                33744921
                cb5b5781-9116-48d3-bce8-403f6d868e72
                © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 23 December 2020
                : 18 January 2021
                : 31 January 2021
                Page count
                Pages: 7
                Categories
                Original Article
                AcademicSubjects/MED00260

                esophageal cancer,esophagectomy,textbook outcome
                esophageal cancer, esophagectomy, textbook outcome

                Comments

                Comment on this article