19
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Grazing intensity significantly affects belowground carbon and nitrogen cycling in grassland ecosystems: a meta-analysis

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references56

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Diversity in tropical rain forests and coral reefs.

          The commonly observed high diversity of trees in tropical rain forests and corals on tropical reefs is a nonequilibrium state which, if not disturbed further, will progress toward a low-diversity equilibrium community. This may not happen if gradual changes in climate favor different species. If equilibrium is reached, a lesser degree of diversity may be sustained by niche diversification or by a compensatory mortality that favors inferior competitors. However, tropical forests and reefs are subject to severe disturbances often enough that equilibrium may never be attained.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The carbon balance of terrestrial ecosystems in China.

            Global terrestrial ecosystems absorbed carbon at a rate of 1-4 Pg yr(-1) during the 1980s and 1990s, offsetting 10-60 per cent of the fossil-fuel emissions. The regional patterns and causes of terrestrial carbon sources and sinks, however, remain uncertain. With increasing scientific and political interest in regional aspects of the global carbon cycle, there is a strong impetus to better understand the carbon balance of China. This is not only because China is the world's most populous country and the largest emitter of fossil-fuel CO(2) into the atmosphere, but also because it has experienced regionally distinct land-use histories and climate trends, which together control the carbon budget of its ecosystems. Here we analyse the current terrestrial carbon balance of China and its driving mechanisms during the 1980s and 1990s using three different methods: biomass and soil carbon inventories extrapolated by satellite greenness measurements, ecosystem models and atmospheric inversions. The three methods produce similar estimates of a net carbon sink in the range of 0.19-0.26 Pg carbon (PgC) per year, which is smaller than that in the conterminous United States but comparable to that in geographic Europe. We find that northeast China is a net source of CO(2) to the atmosphere owing to overharvesting and degradation of forests. By contrast, southern China accounts for more than 65 per cent of the carbon sink, which can be attributed to regional climate change, large-scale plantation programmes active since the 1980s and shrub recovery. Shrub recovery is identified as the most uncertain factor contributing to the carbon sink. Our data and model results together indicate that China's terrestrial ecosystems absorbed 28-37 per cent of its cumulated fossil carbon emissions during the 1980s and 1990s.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              CO2balance of boreal, temperate, and tropical forests derived from a global database

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Global Change Biology
                Glob Change Biol
                Wiley
                13541013
                March 2017
                March 2017
                September 22 2016
                : 23
                : 3
                : 1167-1179
                Affiliations
                [1 ]School of Ecological and Environmental Sciences; East China Normal University; Shanghai 200062 China
                [2 ]Institute of Agricultural Engineering; Jiangsu University; Zhenjiang Jiangsu 212013 China
                [3 ]Center for Global Change and Ecological Forecasting; East China Normal University; Shanghai 200062 China
                [4 ]Coastal Ecosystems Research Station of Yangtze River Estuary; Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Biodiversity Science and Ecological Engineering; Institute of Biodiversity Science; Fudan University; 220 Handan Road Shanghai 200433 China
                [5 ]Faculty of Science, Health, Education and Engineering; University of the Sunshine Coast; Maroochydore, DC Qld 4558 Australia
                Article
                10.1111/gcb.13431
                27416555
                cb660c67-2d5e-4b78-bf26-f56ca328935a
                © 2016

                http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1

                http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article