9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Tibial Bone Transport Over an Intramedullary Nail Using Cable and Pulleys

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Overview

          Introduction

          Use of a cable-pulley system over an intramedullary nail for posttraumatic bone loss mitigates many of the disadvantages of classic Ilizarov bone transpot with external fixation alone; the following description of the procedure is for a distal tibial diaphyseal defect with the transport from proximal to distal (anterograde).

          Step 1: Debridement

          The local environment requires thorough debridement.

          Step 2: Proximal Tibial Osteotomy for Lengthening

          In the planned location, perform the tibial osteotomy prior to insertion of the intramedullary nail ( Fig. 4 ) .

          Step 3: Insertion of the Intramedullary Nail

          Prepare the nail path by reaming the medullary canal of the tibia.

          Step 4: Wrapping the Steel Cable Around the End of the Tibia ( Fig. 6)

          Wrap a 1.8-mm Ilizarov threaded cable around the end of the anterior aspect of the tibia.

          Step 5: Passing the Cable from the Tibia to the Pulley ( Fig. 7)

          Bring the threaded cable out of the leg at the planned level of the pulleys.

          Step 6: Wound Closure

          Close the surgical wounds prior to mounting the circular frame.

          Step 7: Mounting a 2-Ring Circular Frame

          Mount a 2-ring circular fixator to the top and bottom parts of the tibia.

          Step 8: Mounting the Pulleys

          Mount pulleys to the distal ring (in cases in which the transporting bone segment is moving from the top of the leg down to the ankle).

          Step 9: Connecting the Steel Cable to the Frame

          Wrap the steel cable around the pulley and connect it to a slotted threaded rod.

          Step 10: Bone Transport ( Fig. 8)

          Initiate the Ilizarov method of distraction osteogenesis.

          Step 12: Postoperative Management

          Postoperative management consists of range-of-motion and strengthening exercises with limited weight-bearing initially.

          Results

          In comparison with classic bone transport (using external fixation alone), our technique involves a similar number of surgical procedures to complete the tibial reconstruction as well as a similar prevalence of unplanned surgical procedures.

          Abstract

          Background:

          Massive bone defects (>8 cm) will not unite without an additional intervention. They require a predictable, durable, and efficient method to regrow bone. The Ilizarov method of tension stress, or distraction osteogenesis, first involves a low-energy osteotomy 1- 5 . The bone segments are then pulled apart, most often using an external device at a specific rate and rhythm (distraction phase), after which the newly formed bone (the regenerate) requires time for consolidation. The consolidation phase is variable and usually requires a substantially greater amount of time before the external device can be removed. Our technique of tibial bone transport over an intramedullary nail using cable and pulleys combines internal and external fixation, allowing the external fixator to be removed at the end of the distraction phase. This increases the efficiency of limb reconstruction and decreases the external-fixator-associated complications.

          Description:

          The procedure begins with thorough debridement, orthogonal tibial cuts, osteotomy, and insertion of a custom intramedullary nail. A 1.8-mm steel cable is wrapped around the anterior cortex of the distal end of the transport segment and exits the skin distal to the docking site. Two standard rings are applied at the proximal and distal aspects of the leg, and 2 pulleys are attached to the ring at the ankle. The steel cable is then attached to slotted threaded rods that connect to the compression distraction rods that will pull the cable up and the bone segment down. Two Ilizarov “clickers” that rotate 0.25 mm with each “click” are the motor of the system. Once the bone transport system is removed, a custom interlocking bolt is placed to capture the transport segment. This prevents recoil of the fragment as there is a substantial amount of tension in the system.

          Alternatives:

          There are no nonsurgical options for reconstruction of massive bone loss. The several alternatives for surgical reconstruction include the inducible membrane Masquelet technique; circular fixation alone with standard Ilizarov bifocal transport, hexapod bifocal transport, or trifocal transport; bone transport and then insertion of an intramedullary nail (Lengthening and Then Nailing, or LATN); and amputation 2- 8 .

          Rationale:

          The standard Ilizarov method for posttraumatic bone loss with external fixation is a well-established surgical procedure with high union rates. However, an external fixator has a high association with pin site infection, and it is cumbersome for the patient. In addition, scarring associated with the wires and half-pins as they progress down the limb is unsightly and painful. The advantage of the cable-pulley system is that the frame is used only in static mode; the cable that pulls the bone transport segment remains at the same exit point of the skin, thus limiting scarring. In addition, as soon as the distraction phase is completed, the external device can be removed. This substantially decreases the time that the external fixator needs to be in place.

          Related collections

          Most cited references9

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Clinical Application of the Tension-Stress Effect for Limb Lengthening

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Ilizarov bone transport treatment for tibial defects.

            To evaluate the results and complications of Ilizarov bone transport in the treatment of tibial bone defects. Retrospectively reviewed consecutive series. Nineteen patients with tibial bone defects were treated by the Ilizarov bone transport method. The mean bone defect was ten centimeters, and there were eight soft-tissue defects. The mean external fixation time was sixteen months. Ten patients required debridement of the bone ends and/or bone grafting of the docking site at the end of transport. Union was achieved in all cases. One refracture of the docking site required retreatment with the Ilizarov apparatus to achieve union. There was one residual leg length discrepancy greater than 2.5 centimeters and two angular deformities greater than 5 degrees. There were no recurrent or residual infections. Seven of the eight soft-tissue defects were closed by soft-tissue transport; the eighth required a free-vascularized flap. The bone results were graded as fifteen excellent, three good, and one fair. The functional results were graded as twelve excellent, six good, and one poor. There were twenty-two minor complications, sixteen major complications without residual sequelae, and three major complications with residual sequelae. To treat the bone defect and the complications, a mean of 2.9 operations per patient was required. Our results compare favorably with those for other methods of bone grafting as well as with those from other published accounts of the Ilizarov method, especially considering the large defect size in this series. The main disadvantage of the Ilizarov method is the lengthy external fixation time.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Limb lengthening and then insertion of an intramedullary nail: a case-matched comparison.

              Distraction osteogenesis is an effective method for lengthening, deformity correction, and treatment of nonunions and bone defects. The classic method uses an external fixator for both distraction and consolidation leading to lengthy times in frames and there is a risk of refracture after frame removal. We suggest a new technique: lengthening and then nailing (LATN) technique in which the frame is used for gradual distraction and then a reamed intramedullary nail inserted to support the bone during the consolidation phase, allowing early removal of the external fixator. We performed a retrospective case-matched comparison of patients lengthened with LATN (39 limbs in 27 patients) technique versus the classic (34 limbs in 27 patients). The LATN group wore the external fixator for less time than the classic group (12 versus 29 weeks). The LATN group had a lower external fixation index (0.5 versus 1.9) and a lower bone healing index (0.8 versus 1.9) than the classic group. LATN confers advantages over the classic method including shorter times needed in external fixation, quicker bone healing, and protection against refracture. There are also advantages over the lengthening over a nail and internal lengthening nail techniques. Level III, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                JBJS Essent Surg Tech
                JBJS Essent Surg Tech
                jbjsest
                jbjsest
                JBJS Essential Surgical Techniques
                The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
                2160-2204
                28 March 2018
                28 March 2018
                : 8
                : 1
                : e9
                Affiliations
                [1 ]McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
                [2 ]Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
                Author notes
                [a ]E-mail address for M. Bernstein: mitchell.bernstein@ 123456mcgill.ca
                [b ]E-mail address for A. Fragomen: fragomena@ 123456hss.edu
                [c ]E-mail address for S.R. Rozbruch: rozbruchsr@ 123456hss.edu
                Article
                ST-D-17-00035 00009
                10.2106/JBJS.ST.17.00035
                6143303
                30233981
                cceb7a35-c117-4a37-bd8e-a210aade8002
                Copyright © 2018 by The Authors. Published by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.

                History
                Page count
                Pages: 12
                Categories
                0170
                Subspecialty Procedures
                Custom metadata
                TRUE
                true
                January - March 2018

                Comments

                Comment on this article