26
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Optimal 2-[ 18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-d-galactose PET/CT protocol for detection of hepatocellular carcinoma

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Positron emission tomography (PET) with the liver-specific galactose tracer 2-[ 18F]fluoro-2-deoxy- d-galactose ( 18F-FDGal) may improve diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The aim of this study was to test which of three different 18F-FDGal PET protocols gives the highest tumour-to-background (T/B) ratio on PET images and thus better detection of HCC tumours.

          Methods

          Ten patients with a total of 15 hepatic HCC tumours were enrolled prior to treatment. An experienced radiologist defined volumes of interest (VOIs) encircling HCC tumours on contrast-enhanced CT (ce-CT) images. Three PET/CT protocols were conducted following an intravenous 18F-FDGal injection: (i) a 20-min dynamic PET/CT of the liver (to generate a 3D metabolic image), (ii) a traditional static whole-body PET/CT after 1 h, and (iii) a late static whole-body PET/CT after 2 or 3 h. PET images from each PET/CT protocol were fused with ce-CT images, and the average standardized uptake values (SUV) in tumour and background liver tissue were used to calculate (T/B) ratios. Furthermore, T peak/B ratios were calculated using the five hottest voxels in all hot tumours. The ratios for the three different PET protocols were compared.

          Results

          For the individual tumours, there was no significant difference in the T/B ratio between the three PET protocols. The metabolic image yielded higher T peak/B ratios than the two static images, but it was easier to identify tumours on the static images. One extrahepatic metastasis was detected.

          Conclusions

          Neither metabolic images nor static whole-body images acquired 2 or 3 h after 18F-FDGal injection offered an advantage to traditional whole-body PET/CT images acquired after 1 h for detection of HCC.

          Related collections

          Most cited references15

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Transection of the oesophagus for bleeding oesophageal varices.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            EASL-EORTC clinical practice guidelines: management of hepatocellular carcinoma.

            (2012)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Positron emission tomography scanning in the evaluation of hepatocellular carcinoma.

              18F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake allows estimation of glucose metabolism by tumor cells using positron emission tomography (PET). We evaluated the role of PET imaging in the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. PET images were collected after intravenous injection of 8-12 mCi of 18F-FDG in 20 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). PET tumor activity level was assessed on a scale of 1 to 4 compared to normal liver tissue. The PET score was compared with abdominal computerized tomography (CT) scan results and between tumors of different grades and differentiation. Of the 20 patients studied, 11 (55%) had positive PET scans (PET score: 3 or 4) while nine (45%) were negative (PET score: 1 or 2). CT scan was positive in 18 patients (90%) and negative in two (10%). PET, however, revealed metastases in three patients that were not seen on CT. On pathological review, well-differentiated and low-grade tumors had lower PET scores. Comparison of the well-differentiated with the moderately- and poorly-differentiated tumors revealed a statistically significant difference. No statistical significance was observed between the moderately- and poorly-differentiated tumors or between different tumor grades and PET scores. The sensitivity of PET in diagnosis of HCC was 55% compared to 90% for CT scanning, although only PET detected some tumors (including distant metastases). Well-differentiated and low tumor grades had lower activity on PET and correspondingly lower PET scores. PET imaging may help assess tumor differentiation and may be useful in the diagnosis and staging and prognostication of HCC as an adjunct to CT.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                +45 7846 3033 , michsoer@rm.dk
                Journal
                EJNMMI Res
                EJNMMI Res
                EJNMMI Research
                Springer Berlin Heidelberg (Berlin/Heidelberg )
                2191-219X
                24 June 2016
                24 June 2016
                2016
                : 6
                : 56
                Affiliations
                [ ]Department of Nuclear Medicine & PET Centre, Aarhus University Hospital, DK8000 Aarhus, Denmark
                [ ]Department of Radiology, Aarhus University Hospital, DK8000 Aarhus, Denmark
                [ ]Department of Hepatology & Gastroenterology, Aarhus University Hospital, Noerrebrogade 44 bldg. 7, DK8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
                [ ]Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
                Article
                206
                10.1186/s13550-016-0206-7
                4920802
                27341819
                cd510a5f-8c95-47d3-ad4e-8f66485958d8
                © The Author(s). 2016

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

                History
                : 21 April 2016
                : 14 June 2016
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100008363, Kræftens Bekæmpelse;
                Award ID: R84-A5566
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100008392, Sundhed og Sygdom, Det Frie Forskningsråd;
                Award ID: DFF-4004-00022
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100003035, Aase og Ejnar Danielsens Fond;
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100006197, Fonden til Lægevidenskabens Fremme;
                Categories
                Original Research
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2016

                Radiology & Imaging
                hepatocellular carcinoma,galactose,dynamic pet,static pet,metabolic clearance
                Radiology & Imaging
                hepatocellular carcinoma, galactose, dynamic pet, static pet, metabolic clearance

                Comments

                Comment on this article