18
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Modeling in Pediatric Drug Development, and the Importance of Standardized Scaling of Clearance

      review-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PKPD) modeling is important in the design and conduct of clinical pharmacology research in children. During drug development, PKPD modeling and simulation should underpin rational trial design and facilitate extrapolation to investigate efficacy and safety. The application of PKPD modeling to optimize dosing recommendations and therapeutic drug monitoring is also increasing, and PKPD model-based dose individualization will become a core feature of personalized medicine. Following extensive progress on pediatric PK modeling, a greater emphasis now needs to be placed on PD modeling to understand age-related changes in drug effects. This paper discusses the principles of PKPD modeling in the context of pediatric drug development, summarizing how important PK parameters, such as clearance (CL), are scaled with size and age, and highlights a standardized method for CL scaling in children. One standard scaling method would facilitate comparison of PK parameters across multiple studies, thus increasing the utility of existing PK models and facilitating optimal design of new studies.

          Related collections

          Most cited references102

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Body size and metabolism

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Diagnosing model diagnostics.

            Conclusions from clinical trial results that are derived from model-based analyses rely on the model adequately describing the underlying system. The traditionally used diagnostics intended to provide information about model adequacy have seldom discussed shortcomings. Without an understanding of the properties of these diagnostics, development and use of new diagnostics, and additional information pertaining to the diagnostics, there is risk that adequate models will be rejected and inadequate models accepted. Thus, a diagnosis of available diagnostics is desirable.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic (PBPK) Modeling and Simulation Approaches: A Systematic Review of Published Models, Applications, and Model Verification.

              Modeling and simulation of drug disposition has emerged as an important tool in drug development, clinical study design and regulatory review, and the number of physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling related publications and regulatory submissions have risen dramatically in recent years. However, the extent of use of PBPK modeling by researchers, and the public availability of models has not been systematically evaluated. This review evaluates PBPK-related publications to 1) identify the common applications of PBPK modeling; 2) determine ways in which models are developed; 3) establish how model quality is assessed; and 4) provide a list of publically available PBPK models for sensitive P450 and transporter substrates as well as selective inhibitors and inducers. PubMed searches were conducted using the terms "PBPK" and "physiologically based pharmacokinetic model" to collect published models. Only papers on PBPK modeling of pharmaceutical agents in humans published in English between 2008 and May 2015 were reviewed. A total of 366 PBPK-related articles met the search criteria, with the number of articles published per year rising steadily. Published models were most commonly used for drug-drug interaction predictions (28%), followed by interindividual variability and general clinical pharmacokinetic predictions (23%), formulation or absorption modeling (12%), and predicting age-related changes in pharmacokinetics and disposition (10%). In total, 106 models of sensitive substrates, inhibitors, and inducers were identified. An in-depth analysis of the model development and verification revealed a lack of consistency in model development and quality assessment practices, demonstrating a need for development of best-practice guidelines.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                +46 (0) 18 471 4304 , eva.germovsek@farmbio.uu.se
                Journal
                Clin Pharmacokinet
                Clin Pharmacokinet
                Clinical Pharmacokinetics
                Springer International Publishing (Cham )
                0312-5963
                1179-1926
                19 April 2018
                19 April 2018
                2019
                : 58
                : 1
                : 39-52
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000000121901201, GRID grid.83440.3b, Infection, Inflammation and Rheumatology Section, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Heath, , University College London, ; London, UK
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 9457, GRID grid.8993.b, Pharmacometrics Research Group, Department of Pharmaceutical Biosciences, , Uppsala University, ; PO Box 591, 751 24 Uppsala, Sweden
                [3 ]ISNI 0000 0000 8546 682X, GRID grid.264200.2, Paediatric Infectious Diseases Research Group, Institute for Infection and Immunity, , St George’s, University of London, ; London, UK
                [4 ]GRID grid.451349.e, St George’s University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, ; London, UK
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2935-0090
                Article
                659
                10.1007/s40262-018-0659-0
                6325987
                29675639
                cd7acf62-4887-4b14-a247-825420693f4b
                © The Author(s) 2018, corrected publication 2018

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

                History
                Funding
                Funded by: European Union Seventh Framework Programme for Research, Technological Development and Demonstration
                Award ID: 242146
                Award ID: 261060
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000317, Action Medical Research;
                Award ID: SP4650
                Award ID: GN1834
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000265, Medical Research Council;
                Award ID: G1002305
                Award ID: M008665
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000272, National Institute for Health Research;
                Award ID: ACF-2016-18-016
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Review Article
                Custom metadata
                © Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

                Comments

                Comment on this article