8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Inhibition of adult liver progenitor (oval) cell growth and viability by an agonist of the peroxisome proliferator activated receptor (PPAR) family member gamma, but not alpha or delta.

      Carcinogenesis
      Animals, Cell Division, drug effects, Cell Line, Cell Survival, Ethionine, toxicity, Liver, cytology, pathology, Male, Mice, Mice, Inbred C57BL, PPAR alpha, agonists, genetics, physiology, PPAR gamma, Receptors, Cytoplasmic and Nuclear, Stem Cells, Thiazoles, pharmacology, Thiazolidinediones

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Multifaceted evidence links the development of liver tumours to the activation and proliferation of adult liver progenitor (oval) cells during the early stages of chronic liver injury. The aim of this study was to examine the role of the peroxisome proliferator activated receptors (PPARs): PPARalpha, delta and gamma, in mediating the behaviour of liver progenitor cells during pre-neoplastic disease and to investigate their potential as therapeutic targets for the treatment of chronic liver injury. We observed increased liver expression of PPARalpha and gamma in concert with expanding oval cell numbers during the first 21 days following commencement of the choline deficient, ethionine supplemented (CDE) dietary model of carcinogenic liver injury in mice. Both primary and immortalized liver progenitor cells were found to express PPARalpha, delta and gamma, but not gamma2, the alternate splice form of PPARgamma. WY14643 (PPARalpha agonist), GW501516 (PPARdelta agonist) and ciglitazone (PPARgamma agonist) were tested for their ability to modulate the behaviour of p53-immortalized liver (PIL) progenitor cell lines in vitro. Both PPARdelta and gamma agonists induced dose-dependent growth inhibition and apoptosis of PIL cells. In contrast, the PPARalpha agonist had no effect on PIL cell growth. None of the drugs affected the maturation of PIL cells along either the hepatocytic or biliary lineages, as judged by their patterns of hepatic gene expression prior to and following treatment. Administration of the PPARgamma agonist ciglitazone to mice fed with the CDE diet for 14 days resulted in a significantly diminished oval cell response and decreased fibrosis compared with those receiving placebo. In contrast, GW501516 did not affect oval cell numbers or liver fibrosis, but inhibited CDE-induced hepatic steatosis. In summary, PPARgamma agonists reduce oval cell proliferation and fibrosis during chronic liver injury and may be useful in the prevention of hepatocellular carcinoma.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Comments

          Comment on this article