9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The Influence of Sleep Quality, Vigilance, and Sleepiness on Driving-Related Cognitive Abilities: A Comparison between Young and Older Adults

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background: Driving performance is strongly vulnerable to drowsiness and vigilance fluctuations. Excessive sleepiness may alter concentration, alertness, and reaction times. As people age, sleep undergoes some changes, becoming fragmented and less deep. However, the effects of these modifications on daily life have not been sufficiently investigated. Recently, the assessment of sleepiness became mandatory in Europe for people at risk who need the driving license release. Moreover, considering the expectation that people around the world are rapidly aging, it is necessary to investigate the relationships between senescence sleep changes, vigilance levels, and driving-related cognitive skills. Method: 80 healthy subjects (40 young adults and 40 elders) participated in the study. Sleep quality, sleepiness, and vigilance levels were assessed through the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, the Karolinska Sleepiness Scale, the Epworth Sleepiness Scale, and the Psychomotor Vigilance Task (PVT). Driving-related cognitive abilities were assessed through Vienna Test System TRAFFIC, investigating selective attention, tachistoscopic perception, and risk assumption. Results: 2 × 2 between-subject ANOVAs showed less habitual sleep efficiency and worse performances in PVT in the older group. Unexpectedly, younger subjects show higher self-rated sleepiness. Moreover, older adults have lower performance in attention and perception tests, but they appear to be more cautious in situations involving traffic. Finally, the multiple regressions show age to be the only robust predictor of cognitive driving-related abilities. Conclusions: This is the first study that investigates the relationships among sleepiness/vigilance and specific driving-related cognitive skills on a sufficiently large sample. Nevertheless, the study should be considered preliminary and does not allow us to understand how specific changes in sleep architecture impact performances in the elders’ everyday life and, specifically, on driving skills.

          Related collections

          Most cited references75

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing under dependency

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A review of the evidence for P2 being an independent component process: age, sleep and modality.

            This article reviews the event-related potential (ERP) literature in relation to the P2 waveform of the human auditory evoked potential. Within the auditory evoked potential, a positive deflection at approximately 150-250 ms is a ubiquitous feature. Unlike other cognitive components such as N1 or the P300, remarkably little has been done to investigate the underlying neurological correlates or significance of this waveform. Indeed until recently, many researchers considered it to be an intrinsic part of the 'vertex potential' complex, involving it and the earlier N1. This review seeks to describe the evidence supportive of P2 being the result of independent processes and highlights several features, such as its persistence from wakefulness into sleep, the general consensus that unlike most other EEG phenomena it increases with age, and the fact that it can be generated using respiratory stimuli.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Sustained attention performance during sleep deprivation: evidence of state instability.

              Nathaniel Kleitman was the first to observe that sleep deprivation in humans did not eliminate the ability to perform neurobehavioral functions, but it did make it difficult to maintain stable performance for more than a few minutes. To investigate variability in performance as a function of sleep deprivation, n = 13 subjects were tested every 2 hours on a 10-minute, sustained-attention, psychomotor vigilance task (PVT) throughout 88 hours of total sleep deprivation (TSD condition), and compared to a control group of n = 15 subjects who were permitted a 2-hour nap every 12 hours (NAP condition) throughout the 88-hour period. PVT reaction time means and standard deviations increased markedly among subjects and within each individual subject in the TSD condition relative to the NAP condition. TSD subjects also had increasingly greater performance variability as a function of time on task after 18 hours of wakefulness. During sleep deprivation, variability in PVT performance reflected a combination of normal timely responses, errors of omission (i.e., lapses), and errors of commission (i.e., responding when no stimulus was present). Errors of omission and errors of commission were highly intercorrelated across deprivation in the TSD condition (r = 0.85, p = 0.0001), suggesting that performance instability is more likely to include compensatory effort than a lack of motivation. The marked increases in PVT performance variability as sleep loss continued supports the "state instability" hypothesis, which posits that performance during sleep deprivation is increasingly variable due to the influence of sleep initiating mechanisms on the endogenous capacity to maintain attention and alertness, thereby creating an unstable state that fluctuates within seconds and that cannot be characterized as either fully awake or asleep.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Brain Sci
                Brain Sci
                brainsci
                Brain Sciences
                MDPI
                2076-3425
                28 May 2020
                June 2020
                : 10
                : 6
                : 327
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Psychology, “Sapienza” University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy; chiara.bartolacci@ 123456uniroma1.it (C.B.); aurora.datri@ 123456uniroma1.it (A.D.); maurizio.gorgoni@ 123456uniroma1.it (M.G.); ludovica.annarumma@ 123456uniroma1.it (L.A.); chiara.ccloos@ 123456gmail.com (C.C.); annamaria.giannini@ 123456uniroma1.it (A.M.G.)
                [2 ]IRCCS Fondazione Santa Lucia, 00142 Rome, Italy; serena.scarpelli@ 123456uniroma1.it
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence: luigi.degennaro@ 123456uniroma1.it ; Tel.: +39-06-49917647; Fax: +39-06-49917711
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0229-4941
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9260-7111
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3613-6631
                Article
                brainsci-10-00327
                10.3390/brainsci10060327
                7349304
                32481581
                cdd5ec66-1884-48b4-85cc-80b7d5f061d8
                © 2020 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 16 April 2020
                : 24 May 2020
                Categories
                Article

                sleepiness,vigilance,driving abilities,aging,sleep,vienna test system

                Comments

                Comment on this article