9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Effect of VEGF trap on normal retinal vascular development and oxygen-induced retinopathy in the dog.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose. To evaluate the effects of a vascular endothelial growth factor trap (VEGF Trap) on retinal vascular development and pathologic neovascularization (NV) in the canine model of oxygen-induced retinopathy (OIR). Methods. Newborn dogs (postnatal day [P]1) were exposed to 100% O(2) and then returned to room air on P5. VEGF Trap (5, 25, or 250 μg) was injected intravitreally in one eye and human FC (hFc) injected in the fellow eye of air control and oxygen-treated dogs on P8. The retinal vasculature and NV were evaluated on P21. Other oxygen-exposed animals received 5 μg of VEGF Trap or hFc on P22 after confirmation of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP)-like pathology and were evaluated at P45. Results. In air controls, both the vascularized area of the retina and the density of superficial capillaries were reduced in 250 or 25 μg VEGF Trap-injected eyes, and deep capillaries were absent. Eyes that received the 5 μg dose were indistinguishable from controls. In oxygen-treated animals, all eyes injected with VEGF Trap exhibited markedly less intravitreal NV than that of hFc-injected fellow eyes, irrespective of dose. Retinal vascular area in OIR animals was significantly reduced in eyes injected with 250 or 25 μg of VEGF Trap, but the 5 μg dose did not inhibit retinal revascularization. Eyes with existing NV that received 5 μg VEGF Trap at P22 exhibited substantial resolution of OIR pathology at P45. Conclusions. The VEGF Trap inhibited the formation of NV, but higher doses also inhibited revascularization of retina when injected at P8. In contrast, the lowest dose tested effectively blocked NV and caused regression of existing NV, without appreciably affecting vasculogenesis or retinal revascularization. These findings suggest that dose selection is an important variable when considering the use of VEGF-targeting agents for the treatment of ROP.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.
          Investigative ophthalmology & visual science
          Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO)
          1552-5783
          0146-0404
          Jun 08 2011
          : 52
          : 7
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Wilmer Ophthalmological Institute, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. glutty@jhmi.edu
          Article
          iovs.10-6798
          10.1167/iovs.10-6798
          3175979
          21357392
          ceb8d8c6-ef26-47fa-b2dd-14b0cf7ffa1e
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article