4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Assessment and feedback methods in competency-based medical education

      ,
      Annals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology
      Elsevier BV

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Graduate and continuing medical education programs have transitioned to a competency-based medical education model, in which abilities necessary for the practice of medicine, called competencies, are defined as learning outcomes. Each competency contains milestones that describe stages of development from novice to master and provide criteria for assessing learners along this continuum. Assessments in competency-based medical education are formative and are intended to assist learners in achieving the next stage in mastery rather than render a final evaluation. Although written examinations are typically used to evaluate learners, assessments measuring the performance of skills, such as direct observation or patient registries, provide stronger evidence of achievement of learning outcomes. Once assessments identify strengths and areas of improvement in a learner, effective feedback is critical in assisting their professional development. Feedback should be routine, timely, nonthreatening, specific, and encourage self-assessment. The "ask-tell-ask" feedback method follows this framework by asking for the learner's self-assessment first, telling the observer's own assessment next, and then finally asking for the learner's questions and action plan to address the issues raised. Effective assessment and feedback in competency-based medical education assists learners in their continued professional development and aims to provide evidence of their impact on the health status of patients and communities.

          Related collections

          Most cited references24

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Health professionals for a new century: transforming education to strengthen health systems in an interdependent world.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Competency-based medical education: theory to practice.

            Although competency-based medical education (CBME) has attracted renewed interest in recent years among educators and policy-makers in the health care professions, there is little agreement on many aspects of this paradigm. We convened a unique partnership - the International CBME Collaborators - to examine conceptual issues and current debates in CBME. We engaged in a multi-stage group process and held a consensus conference with the aim of reviewing the scholarly literature of competency-based medical education, identifying controversies in need of clarification, proposing definitions and concepts that could be useful to educators across many jurisdictions, and exploring future directions for this approach to preparing health professionals. In this paper, we describe the evolution of CBME from the outcomes movement in the 20th century to a renewed approach that, focused on accountability and curricular outcomes and organized around competencies, promotes greater learner-centredness and de-emphasizes time-based curricular design. In this paradigm, competence and related terms are redefined to emphasize their multi-dimensional, dynamic, developmental, and contextual nature. CBME therefore has significant implications for the planning of medical curricula and will have an important impact in reshaping the enterprise of medical education. We elaborate on this emerging CBME approach and its related concepts, and invite medical educators everywhere to enter into further dialogue about the promise and the potential perils of competency-based medical curricula for the 21st century.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Current concepts in validity and reliability for psychometric instruments: theory and application.

              Validity and reliability relate to the interpretation of scores from psychometric instruments (eg, symptom scales, questionnaires, education tests, and observer ratings) used in clinical practice, research, education, and administration. Emerging paradigms replace prior distinctions of face, content, and criterion validity with the unitary concept "construct validity," the degree to which a score can be interpreted as representing the intended underlying construct. Evidence to support the validity argument is collected from 5 sources: Do instrument items completely represent the construct? The relationship between the intended construct and the thought processes of subjects or observers. Acceptable reliability and factor structure. Correlation with scores from another instrument assessing the same construct. Do scores really make a difference? Evidence should be sought from a variety of sources to support a given interpretation. Reliable scores are necessary, but not sufficient, for valid interpretation. Increased attention to the systematic collection of validity evidence for scores from psychometric instruments will improve assessments in research, patient care, and education.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                Annals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology
                Annals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology
                Elsevier BV
                10811206
                March 2022
                March 2022
                : 128
                : 3
                : 256-262
                Article
                10.1016/j.anai.2021.12.010
                34929390
                cf50a7a1-4988-4208-b93c-55ac76181689
                © 2022

                https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article