16
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Accuracy and reproducibility of automated estradiol-17beta and progesterone assays using native serum samples: results obtained in the Belgian external assessment scheme.

      Human Reproduction (Oxford, England)
      Belgium, Chemistry, Clinical, standards, Estradiol, blood, Female, Frozen Sections, Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry, Humans, Immunoassay, Linear Models, Pregnancy, Progesterone, Quality Control, Reproducibility of Results

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          In 2005, a special survey in the Belgian External Quality Assessment focused on the performance of six automated immunoassay analysers most frequently used in Belgium for estradiol-17beta (E(2)) and progesterone. Results obtained were compared with values determined by reference method, isotope dilution-gas chromatograph/mass spectrometry (ID-GC/MS). Five fresh frozen serum samples, without additives, from single donors and three pools from pregnant women were distributed to all registered Belgian laboratories. Total variation, bias, linear relationship within the reported range and linear regression were investigated. Inter-laboratory coefficients of variation ranged from 4 to 49% for E(2) and from 6 to 45% for progesterone. Bias ranged from -26 to 239% for E(2) and from -23 to 81% for progesterone. Several systems showed an upward bias for one particular sample of at least 25%. Weighted linear regression showed overall bias ranging from -8% to 32% for E(2) and from 7% to 41% for progesterone. Few automated methods succeed in having an excellent reproducibility for E(2) and progesterone. Given the high bias values it is suggested that, for performance testing, results be compared whenever possible with a reference method. The linear relationship as assessed by comparing results with those obtained by ID-GC/MS using samples from different donors was not assured for most methods.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Comments

          Comment on this article