Blog
About

716
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Feature selection based on mutual information: criteria of max-dependency, max-relevance, and min-redundancy.

      IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence

      methods, Pattern Recognition, Automated, Numerical Analysis, Computer-Assisted, diagnosis, classification, Neoplasms, Models, Statistical, Information Storage and Retrieval, Humans, Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted, Computer Simulation, Cluster Analysis, Artificial Intelligence, Algorithms

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Feature selection is an important problem for pattern classification systems. We study how to select good features according to the maximal statistical dependency criterion based on mutual information. Because of the difficulty in directly implementing the maximal dependency condition, we first derive an equivalent form, called minimal-redundancy-maximal-relevance criterion (mRMR), for first-order incremental feature selection. Then, we present a two-stage feature selection algorithm by combining mRMR and other more sophisticated feature selectors (e.g., wrappers). This allows us to select a compact set of superior features at very low cost. We perform extensive experimental comparison of our algorithm and other methods using three different classifiers (naive Bayes, support vector machine, and linear discriminate analysis) and four different data sets (handwritten digits, arrhythmia, NCI cancer cell lines, and lymphoma tissues). The results confirm that mRMR leads to promising improvement on feature selection and classification accuracy.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          16119262
          10.1109/TPAMI.2005.159

          Comments

          Comment on this article