0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Relationship of plasma biomarkers to digital cognitive tests in Alzheimer's disease

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          INTRODUCTION

          A major limitation in Alzheimer's disease (AD) research is the lack of the ability to measure cognitive performance at scale—robustly, remotely, and frequently. Currently, there are no established online digital platforms validated against plasma biomarkers of AD.

          METHODS

          We used a novel web‐based platform that assessed different cognitive functions in AD patients ( N = 46) and elderly controls ( N = 53) who were also evaluated for plasma biomarkers (amyloid beta 42/40 ratio, phosphorylated tau ([p‐tau]181, glial fibrillary acidic protein, neurofilament light chain). Their cognitive performance was compared to a second, larger group of elderly controls ( N = 352).

          RESULTS

          Patients with AD were significantly impaired across all digital cognitive tests, with performance correlating with plasma biomarker levels, particularly p‐tau181. The combination of p‐tau181 and the single best‐performing digital test achieved high accuracy in group classification.

          DISCUSSION

          These findings show how online testing can now be deployed in patients with AD to measure cognitive function effectively and related to blood biomarkers of the disease.

          Highlights

          • This is the first study comparing online digital testing to plasma biomarkers.

          • Alzheimer's disease patients and two independent cohorts of elderly controls were assessed.

          • Cognitive performance correlated with plasma biomarkers, particularly phosphorylated tau (p‐tau)181.

          • Glial fibrillary acidic protein and neurofilament light chain, and less so the amyloid beta 42/40 ratio, were also associated with performance.

          • The best cognitive metric performed at par to p‐tau181 in group classification.

          Related collections

          Most cited references66

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found

          The diagnosis of dementia due to Alzheimer's disease: Recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer's Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer's disease

          The National Institute on Aging and the Alzheimer's Association charged a workgroup with the task of revising the 1984 criteria for Alzheimer's disease (AD) dementia. The workgroup sought to ensure that the revised criteria would be flexible enough to be used by both general healthcare providers without access to neuropsychological testing, advanced imaging, and cerebrospinal fluid measures, and specialized investigators involved in research or in clinical trial studies who would have these tools available. We present criteria for all-cause dementia and for AD dementia. We retained the general framework of probable AD dementia from the 1984 criteria. On the basis of the past 27 years of experience, we made several changes in the clinical criteria for the diagnosis. We also retained the term possible AD dementia, but redefined it in a manner more focused than before. Biomarker evidence was also integrated into the diagnostic formulations for probable and possible AD dementia for use in research settings. The core clinical criteria for AD dementia will continue to be the cornerstone of the diagnosis in clinical practice, but biomarker evidence is expected to enhance the pathophysiological specificity of the diagnosis of AD dementia. Much work lies ahead for validating the biomarker diagnosis of AD dementia. Copyright © 2011. Published by Elsevier Inc.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The weirdest people in the world?

            Behavioral scientists routinely publish broad claims about human psychology and behavior in the world's top journals based on samples drawn entirely from Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, and Democratic (WEIRD) societies. Researchers - often implicitly - assume that either there is little variation across human populations, or that these "standard subjects" are as representative of the species as any other population. Are these assumptions justified? Here, our review of the comparative database from across the behavioral sciences suggests both that there is substantial variability in experimental results across populations and that WEIRD subjects are particularly unusual compared with the rest of the species - frequent outliers. The domains reviewed include visual perception, fairness, cooperation, spatial reasoning, categorization and inferential induction, moral reasoning, reasoning styles, self-concepts and related motivations, and the heritability of IQ. The findings suggest that members of WEIRD societies, including young children, are among the least representative populations one could find for generalizing about humans. Many of these findings involve domains that are associated with fundamental aspects of psychology, motivation, and behavior - hence, there are no obvious a priori grounds for claiming that a particular behavioral phenomenon is universal based on sampling from a single subpopulation. Overall, these empirical patterns suggests that we need to be less cavalier in addressing questions of human nature on the basis of data drawn from this particularly thin, and rather unusual, slice of humanity. We close by proposing ways to structurally re-organize the behavioral sciences to best tackle these challenges.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Lecanemab in Early Alzheimer’s Disease

              The accumulation of soluble and insoluble aggregated amyloid-beta (Aβ) may initiate or potentiate pathologic processes in Alzheimer's disease. Lecanemab, a humanized IgG1 monoclonal antibody that binds with high affinity to Aβ soluble protofibrils, is being tested in persons with early Alzheimer's disease.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                sofia.toniolo@ndcn.ox.ac.uk
                Journal
                Alzheimers Dement (Amst)
                Alzheimers Dement (Amst)
                10.1002/(ISSN)2352-8729
                DAD2
                Alzheimer's & Dementia : Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                2352-8729
                14 April 2024
                Apr-Jun 2024
                : 16
                : 2 ( doiID: 10.1002/dad2.v16.2 )
                : e12590
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences University of Oxford Oxford UK
                [ 2 ] Cognitive Disorders Clinic JR Hospital Oxford UK
                [ 3 ] Department of Experimental Psychology University of Oxford Oxford UK
                [ 4 ] UK Dementia Research Institute UCL London UK
                [ 5 ] Department of Neurodegenerative Disease UCL Institute of Neurology London UK
                [ 6 ] Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology University of Gothenburg Gothenburg Sweden
                [ 7 ] Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory Sahlgrenska University Hospital Mölndal Sweden
                [ 8 ] Hong Kong Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases Hong Kong China
                [ 9 ] Wisconsin Alzheimer's Disease Research Center University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health University of Wisconsin‐Madison Madison Wisconsin USA
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Sofia Toniolo, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences and Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, New Radcliffe House, 1st Floor, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK.

                Email: sofia.toniolo@ 123456ndcn.ox.ac.uk

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1833-4995
                Article
                DAD212590
                10.1002/dad2.12590
                11016819
                38623387
                d0f1db02-255e-4ac2-9cb1-b2166af58809
                © 2024 The Authors. Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Alzheimer's Association.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 19 March 2024
                : 12 September 2023
                : 21 March 2024
                Page count
                Figures: 5, Tables: 2, Pages: 18, Words: 11874
                Funding
                Funded by: Wellcome Trust , doi 10.13039/100010269;
                Award ID: 206330/Z/17/Z
                Funded by: Swedish Research Council , doi 10.13039/501100004359;
                Award ID: #2022‐01018
                Award ID: #2019‐02397
                Funded by: European Union's Horizon Europe research and innovation programme
                Award ID: 101053962
                Funded by: Swedish State Support for Clinical Research
                Award ID: #ALFGBG‐71320
                Funded by: Alzheimer Drug Discovery Foundation
                Funded by: AD Strategic Fund
                Funded by: Alzheimer's Association , doi 10.13039/100000957;
                Award ID: #ADSF‐21‐831376‐C
                Award ID: #ADSF‐21‐831381‐C
                Award ID: #ADSF‐21‐831377‐C
                Funded by: Bluefield Project
                Funded by: Olav Thon Foundation
                Funded by: Erling‐Persson Family Foundation , doi 10.13039/100007436;
                Funded by: Stiftelsen för Gamla Tjänarinnor , doi 10.13039/100010815;
                Funded by: Hjärnfonden , doi 10.13039/501100003792;
                Award ID: #FO2022‐0270
                Funded by: European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme
                Award ID: 860197
                Funded by: European Union Joint Programme – Neurodegenerative Disease Research
                Award ID: JPND2021‐00694
                Funded by: National Institute for Health and Care Research University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre
                Funded by: UK Dementia Research Institute , doi 10.13039/501100017510;
                Award ID: UKDRI‐1003
                Categories
                Research Article
                Research Articles
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                April‐june 2024
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.4.0 mode:remove_FC converted:15.04.2024

                cognition,dementia,memory,online testing,phosphorylated tau
                cognition, dementia, memory, online testing, phosphorylated tau

                Comments

                Comment on this article