19
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Pneumoperitoneum in peritoneal dialysis patients; one centre’s experience

      case-report
      , ,
      NDT Plus
      Oxford University Press
      pneumoaspiration, pneumoperitoneum

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The pneumoperitoneum (PP) on upright chest X-ray (CXR) usually indicates a perforated viscus. As peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheter provides an additional port of air entry into the peritoneal cavity, the incidence and clinical significance of PP in PD patients has been debated in the literature (a variable incidence from 4 to 34% has been reported in previous studies). With improvement in patient training and connecting devices of PD catheters, technique-related PP is quite rare. Following a recent patient with PP, we reviewed our 3-year data to evaluate the incidence and significance of this radiological sign in PD patients.

          We reviewed all upright CXRs in our PD patients from 2006 to 2008, using an electronic radiology database. Over 3 years, we had a total of 156 patients on PD. We have reviewed a total 312 upright CXRs (mean 2 X-rays per patient), which were performed for various clinical reasons during this period.

          Seven PD patients had 11 CXRs showing free air under the diaphragm (total incidence of PP 4% of PD population and 3% of CXR performed in PD patients). One patient had two episodes of PP with a total of four X-rays demonstrating free air. Two patients had surgical complications of PD catheter insertion and PP was diagnosed just after the insertion of PD catheter, both of them needed laparotomy. Five patients had incidental PP, which was possibly technique related. In four of these patients with incidental PP, no definite intervention was needed. However, one of these five patients was symptomatic. We established that the cause of PP was faulty technique. Aspiration of PP with a patient in the Trendelenburg position gave her immediate symptomatic relief. We also retrained her to prevent further episodes of PP.

          This review demonstrates the quite low and falling incidence of PP (<4% in a prevalent PD population) most likely due to improvement in training and technique. The air should not enter the peritoneal cavity in normal properly performed exchanges. Air under the diaphragm in a PD patient requires appropriate evaluation to exclude visceral perforation. After that, patient technique of PD exchanges should be reviewed. However, if PP persists, aspiration of air can give symptomatic relief.

          Related collections

          Most cited references5

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Incidence and significance of pneumoperitoneum in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis.

          In a retrospective study we reviewed upright chest x-ray films of 101 continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) patients to determine the incidence and significance of free subdiaphragmal air. A pneumoperitoneum (PP) was diagnosed if a minimal shadow of free air was detected under the diaphragm. The amount of free air was determined by measuring the height and width of the subdiaphragmal air shadow. Of all CAPD patients, 33.6% (34 of 101) had at least one occurrence of PP. Thirteen of these 34 patients (38.2%) were diagnosed within 30 days after catheter implantation, 10 patients (29.5%) acquired a PP during an episode of peritonitis, and in 11 patients (32.4%) no additional risk factor could be determined. Patients radiographed within 30 days after catheter implantation showed a statistically significant higher incidence of PP compared with the same patients radiographed later (22% v 10%; P < 0.05). The incidence of PP in CAPD patients suffering from peritonitis (33%) was significantly higher than in patients without peritonitis (10%; P < 0.001). The amount of free air did not differ statistically significantly between the investigated groups. Only two patients with PP and peritonitis had surgically confirmed visceral perforation. Therefore, the main reason for PP seemed to be handling faults during CAPD bag exchange. There was no correlation between the organisms causing peritonitis and PP or the CAPD connector system and PP. In conclusion, a PP occurs in approximately one third of all CAPD patients and a visceral perforation cannot be diagnosed by the occurrence and amount of free subdiaphragmal air.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Is air under the diaphragm a significant finding in CAPD patients?

            The incidence of air under the diaphragm in CAPD patients is very low, and causes directly attributable to standard CAPD techniques are even lower. Bowel perforation generally causes a larger volume of air collection under the diaphragm.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Air under the diaphragm in patients undergoing continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD).

              To understand the significance of pneumoperitoneum in patients undergoing continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD), we reviewed 110 upright x-rays of 33 patients. Only 3 x-rays belonging to 2 patients displayed large amounts of air under the diaphragm. One patient had documented colonic perforation and the other patient used a faulty technique that introduced air into the abdomen. Five additional asymptomatic patients showed minute amounts of air. We conclude that large amounts of air, as defined radiographically by an air shadow of more than 5 mm in height, is unusual in CAPD patients and should be taken seriously as suggestive of bowel perforation until proven otherwise.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                NDT Plus
                NDT Plus
                ndtplus
                ckj
                NDT Plus
                Oxford University Press
                1753-0784
                1753-0792
                April 2011
                08 February 2011
                : 4
                : 2
                : 120-123
                Affiliations
                Department of Nephrology, Royal Liverpool University Hospital Trust, Liverpool, UK
                Author notes
                Correspondence and offprint requests to: Hameed Anijeet; E-mail: Hameed.Anijeet@ 123456rlbuht.nhs.uk
                Article
                10.1093/ndtplus/sfq208
                4421564
                25984130
                d10a8153-eaa2-4338-b133-80e813fd3446
                © Crown copyright 2011
                History
                : 23 November 2010
                : 23 November 2010
                Categories
                Clinical Reports
                Case Reports

                Nephrology
                pneumoaspiration,pneumoperitoneum
                Nephrology
                pneumoaspiration, pneumoperitoneum

                Comments

                Comment on this article