26
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Effects of shepherds and dogs on livestock depredation by leopards ( Panthera pardus) in north-eastern Iran

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Human-carnivore conflicts over livestock depredation are increasingly common, yet little is understood about the role of husbandry in conflict mitigation. As shepherds and guarding dogs are most commonly used to curb carnivore attacks on grazing livestock, evaluation and improvement of these practices becomes an important task. We addressed this issue by studying individual leopard ( Panthera pardus) attacks on sheep and goats in 34 villages near Golestan National Park, Iran. We obtained and analyzed data on 39 attacks, which included a total loss of 31 sheep and 36 goats in 17 villages. We applied non-parametric testing, Poisson Generalized Linear Modelling (GLM) and model selection to assess how numbers of sheep and goats killed per attack are associated with the presence and absence of shepherds and dogs during attacks, depredation in previous years, villages, seasons, ethnic groups, numbers of sheep and goats kept in villages, and distances from villages to the nearest protected areas. We found that 95.5% of losses were inflicted in forests when sheep and goats were accompanied by shepherds (92.5% of losses) and dogs (77.6%). Leopards tended to kill more sheep and goats per attack (surplus killing) when dogs were absent in villages distant from protected areas, but still inflicted most losses when dogs were present, mainly in villages near protected areas. No other variables affected numbers of sheep and goats killed per attack. These results indicate that local husbandry practices are ineffectual and the mere presence of shepherds and guarding dogs is not enough to secure protection. Shepherds witnessed leopard attacks, but could not deter them while dogs did not exhibit guarding behavior and were sometimes killed by leopards. In an attempt to make practical, low-cost and socially acceptable improvements in local husbandry, we suggest that dogs are raised to create a strong social bond with livestock, shepherds use only best available dogs, small flocks are aggregated into larger ones and available shepherds herd these larger flocks together. Use of deterrents and avoidance of areas close to Golestan and in central, core areas of neighboring protected areas is also essential to keep losses down.

          Related collections

          Most cited references31

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          A brief guide to model selection, multimodel inference and model averaging in behavioural ecology using Akaike’s information criterion

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Do not log-transform count data

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              A review of the interactions between free-roaming domestic dogs and wildlife

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                PeerJ
                PeerJ
                peerj
                peerj
                PeerJ
                PeerJ Inc. (San Francisco, USA )
                2167-8359
                23 February 2017
                2017
                : 5
                : e3049
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Workgroup on Endangered Species, J.F. Blumenbach Institute of Zoology and Anthropology, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen , Göttingen, Germany
                [2 ]Department of Environmental Sciences, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources , Gorgan, Iran
                [3 ]Persian Wildlife Heritage Foundation , Tehran, Iran
                [4 ]Conservation Biogeography Lab, Geography Department, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin , Berlin, Germany
                Article
                3049
                10.7717/peerj.3049
                5326547
                28243544
                d118573e-8795-46af-b6c2-14851d433ee7
                ©2017 Khorozyan et al.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.

                History
                : 14 November 2016
                : 30 January 2017
                Funding
                Funded by: Alexander von Humboldt Foundation
                Award ID: 3.3-ARM/1151598 STP
                Funded by: Mohamed bin Zayed Species Conservation Fund
                Award ID: 12255025
                Award ID: 14059333
                Funded by: Prince Bernhard Nature Fund, EU Erasmus Mundus/SALAM
                Award ID: 2013-2437-001-001-EMA2
                Funded by: German Academic Exchange Service
                Award ID: 91540556
                Funded by: German Research Foundation
                Award ID: WA 2153/5-1
                Funded by: Open Access Publication Fund of University of Göttingen
                This work was supported by Alexander von Humboldt Foundation (No. 3.3-ARM/1151598 STP), Mohamed bin Zayed Species Conservation Fund (No. 12255025 and 14059333), Prince Bernhard Nature Fund, EU Erasmus Mundus/SALAM (No. 2013-2437-001-001-EMA2), German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD, No. 91540556), German Research Foundation (DFG, WA 2153/5-1) and the Open Access Publication Fund of University of Göttingen. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Biodiversity
                Conservation Biology
                Ecology

                human-wildlife conflict,carnivore conservation,husbandry,mitigation

                Comments

                Comment on this article