12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Seagrass blue carbon spatial patterns at the meadow-scale

      research-article
      * , ,
      PLoS ONE
      Public Library of Science

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Most information on seagrass carbon burial derives from point measurements, which are sometimes scaled by meadow area to estimate carbon stocks; however, sediment organic carbon (C org) concentrations may vary with distance from the meadow edge, resulting in spatial gradients that affect the accuracy of stock estimates. We mapped sediment C org concentrations throughout a large (6 km 2) restored seagrass meadow to determine whether C org distribution patterns exist at different spatial scales. The meadow originated from ≤1-acre plots seeded between 2001 and 2004, so we expected C org to vary spatially according to the known meadow age at sample sites and with proximity to the meadow edge. Applying spatial autoregressive models allowed us to control for spatial autocorrelation and quantify the relative effects of edge proximity and age on C org concentrations. We found that edge proximity, not age, significantly predicted the meadow-scale C org distribution. We also evaluated relationships between C org and a variety of specific explanatory variables, including site relative exposure, shoot density, sediment grain size, and bathymetry. Factors known to affect carbon burial at the plot-scale, such as meadow age and shoot density, were not significant controls on the meadow-scale C org distribution. Strong correlations between C org, grain size, and edge proximity suggest that current attenuation increases fine-sediment deposition and, therefore, carbon burial with distance into the meadow. By mapping the sediment C org pool, we provide the first accurate quantification of an enhanced carbon stock attributable to seagrass restoration. The top 12 cm of the bed contain 3660 t C org, approximately 1200 t more C org than an equal area of bare sediment. Most of that net increase is concentrated in a meadow area with low tidal current velocities. Managers should account for the effects of meadow configuration and current velocity when estimating seagrass blue carbon stocks. Our results suggest that a large, contiguous meadow should store more blue carbon than an equal area of small meadow patches.

          Related collections

          Most cited references46

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Variability in the Carbon Storage of Seagrass Habitats and Its Implications for Global Estimates of Blue Carbon Ecosystem Service

          The recent focus on carbon trading has intensified interest in ‘Blue Carbon’–carbon sequestered by coastal vegetated ecosystems, particularly seagrasses. Most information on seagrass carbon storage is derived from studies of a single species, Posidonia oceanica, from the Mediterranean Sea. We surveyed 17 Australian seagrass habitats to assess the variability in their sedimentary organic carbon (Corg) stocks. The habitats encompassed 10 species, in mono-specific or mixed meadows, depositional to exposed habitats and temperate to tropical habitats. There was an 18-fold difference in the Corg stock (1.09–20.14 mg Corg cm−3 for a temperate Posidonia sinuosa and a temperate, estuarine P. australis meadow, respectively). Integrated over the top 25 cm of sediment, this equated to an areal stock of 262–4833 g Corg m−2. For some species, there was an effect of water depth on the Corg stocks, with greater stocks in deeper sites; no differences were found among sub-tidal and inter-tidal habitats. The estimated carbon storage in Australian seagrass ecosystems, taking into account inter-habitat variability, was 155 Mt. At a 2014–15 fixed carbon price of A$25.40 t−1 and an estimated market price of $35 t−1 in 2020, the Corg stock in the top 25 cm of seagrass habitats has a potential value of $AUD 3.9–5.4 bill. The estimates of annual Corg accumulation by Australian seagrasses ranged from 0.093 to 6.15 Mt, with a most probable estimate of 0.93 Mt y−1 (10.1 t. km−2 y−1). These estimates, while large, were one-third of those that would be calculated if inter-habitat variability in carbon stocks were not taken into account. We conclude that there is an urgent need for more information on the variability in seagrass carbon stock and accumulation rates, and the factors driving this variability, in order to improve global estimates of seagrass Blue Carbon storage.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Marine macrophytes as a global carbon sink.

            Marine macrophyte biomass production, burial, oxidation, calcium carbonate dissolution, and metabolically accelerated diffusion of carbon dioxide across the air-sea interface may combine to sequester at least 10(9) tons of carbon per year in the ocean. This carbon sink may partially account for discrepancies in extant global carbon budgets.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Influence of physical setting on seagrass landscapes near Beaufort, North Carolina, USA

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                27 April 2017
                2017
                : 12
                : 4
                : e0176630
                Affiliations
                [001]Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, United States of America
                University of Alabama, UNITED STATES
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                • Conceptualization: MPJO KJM.

                • Data curation: JHP.

                • Formal analysis: MPJO.

                • Funding acquisition: KJM MPJO.

                • Investigation: MPJO.

                • Methodology: MPJO KJM JHP.

                • Project administration: MPJO KJM.

                • Resources: MPJO KJM.

                • Writing – original draft: MPJO KJM.

                • Writing – review & editing: MPJO KJM JHP.

                Article
                PONE-D-16-45299
                10.1371/journal.pone.0176630
                5407773
                28448617
                d157621e-b2cc-4455-9827-3bf55c0bdcaa
                © 2017 Oreska et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 14 November 2016
                : 13 April 2017
                Page count
                Figures: 6, Tables: 4, Pages: 18
                Funding
                Funding was provided by National Science Foundation Virginia Coast Reserve Long Term Ecological Research Grant DEB-1237733, the University of Virginia Office of the Vice President and Department of Environmental Sciences (MPJO), the University of Virginia Jefferson Scholars Foundation (MPJO), and by Virginia Sea Grant (MPJO). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Earth Sciences
                Geology
                Petrology
                Sediment
                Earth Sciences
                Geology
                Sedimentary Geology
                Sediment
                Engineering and Technology
                Environmental Engineering
                Carbon Sequestration
                Computer and Information Sciences
                Geoinformatics
                Spatial Autocorrelation
                Earth Sciences
                Geography
                Geoinformatics
                Spatial Autocorrelation
                Physical Sciences
                Chemistry
                Chemical Compounds
                Carbon Dioxide
                Physical Sciences
                Physics
                Classical Mechanics
                Mechanical Stress
                Shear Stresses
                Social Sciences
                Economics
                Finance
                Physical Sciences
                Chemistry
                Environmental Chemistry
                Carbon Cycle
                Ecology and Environmental Sciences
                Environmental Chemistry
                Carbon Cycle
                Physical Sciences
                Physics
                Classical Mechanics
                Continuum Mechanics
                Fluid Mechanics
                Fluid Dynamics
                Hydrodynamics
                Custom metadata
                Data collected during this study can be obtained from the Long Term Ecological Research Network database ( https://www.lternet.edu). The dataset is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.6073/pasta/8c7591cafb91beb0e5949ee3fdcefc15.

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article