8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Determining virological suppression and resuppression by point-of-care viral load testing in a HIV care setting in sub-Saharan Africa

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          This prospective pilot study explored same-day point-of-care viral load testing in a setting in Ghana that has yet to implement virological monitoring of antiretroviral therapy (ART).

          Methods

          Consecutive patients accessing outpatient care while on ART underwent HIV-1 RNA quantification by Xpert. Those with viraemia at the first measurement (T0) received immediate adherence counselling and were reassessed 8 weeks later (T1). Predictors of virological status were determined by logistic regression analysis. Drug resistance-associated mutations (RAMs) were detected by Sanger sequencing.

          Findings

          At T0, participants had received treatment for a median of 8·9 years; 297/333 (89·2%) were on NNRTI-based ART. The viral load was ≥40 copies/mL in 164/333 (49·2%) patients and ≥1000 copies/mL in 71/333 (21·3%). In the latter group, 50/65 (76·9%) and 55/65 (84·6%) harboured NRTI and NNRTI RAMs, respectively, and 27/65 (41·5%) had ≥1 tenofovir RAM. Among 150/164 (91·5%) viraemic patients that reattended at T1, 32/150 (21·3%) showed resuppression <40 copies/mL, comprising 1/65 (1·5%) subjects with T0 viral load ≥1000 copies/mL and 31/85 (36·5%) subjects with lower levels. A T0 viral load ≥1000 copies/mL and detection of RAMs predicted ongoing T1 viraemia independently of self-reported adherence levels. Among participants with T0 viral load ≥1000 copies/mL, 23/65 (35·4%) showed resuppression <1000 copies/mL; the response was more likely among those with higher adherence levels and no RAMs.

          Interpretation

          Same-day point-of-care viral load testing was feasible and revealed poor virological control and suboptimal resuppression rates despite adherence counselling. Controlled studies should determine optimal triaging modalities for same-day versus deferred viral load testing.

          Funding

          University of Liverpool, South Tees Infectious Diseases Research Fund

          Related collections

          Most cited references31

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found

          Sexual Activity Without Condoms and Risk of HIV Transmission in Serodifferent Couples When the HIV-Positive Partner Is Using Suppressive Antiretroviral Therapy

          A key factor in assessing the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of antiretroviral therapy (ART) as a prevention strategy is the absolute risk of HIV transmission through condomless sex with suppressed HIV-1 RNA viral load for both anal and vaginal sex.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Scale-up of Routine Viral Load Testing in Resource-Poor Settings: Current and Future Implementation Challenges

            Cost and complexity have hindered implementation to date of viral load testing in resource-limited settings. If rapid and timely scale-up is to become a reality, numerous factors will need to be addressed, including health and laboratory system strengthening, pricing, and multiple programmatic and funding challenges.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Viral load monitoring as a tool to reinforce adherence: a systematic review.

              Viral load monitoring has been proposed as a tool to reinforce adherence, but outcomes have never been systematically assessed. A meta-analysis was conducted to systematically analyze the research on viral load monitoring as a tool to reinforce adherence. Viremic resuppression is defined here as a decrease in viral load beneath a particular threshold following viral load levels that have been elevated despite antiretroviral treatment. Six databases were searched for studies published up to November 2012, which reported the use of viral load monitoring as a tool to identify patients in need of adherence support. Three conference abstract sites were reviewed for studies reported in the last 2 years. Randomized and quasi-randomized trials and observational studies, were eligible. No language or geographical restrictions were applied. Six retrospective and 2 prospective observational studies reported data from 8 countries: South Africa, the United States, Thailand, Mali, Burkina Faso, Swaziland, India, and France. Five studies reported on viremic resuppression, with a pooled estimate of 70.5% (95% confidence interval: 56.6% to 84.4%) resuppressed. The remaining 3 studies all reported declines in mean viral load. Delayed onset of routine viral load monitoring was associated with the emergence of drug resistance. The clear trend of resuppression, following viral load testing and adherence support, demonstrates the utility of viral load as a tool to identify patients in need of enhanced adherence support.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                EClinicalMedicine
                EClinicalMedicine
                EClinicalMedicine
                Elsevier
                2589-5370
                05 January 2020
                January 2020
                05 January 2020
                : 18
                : 100231
                Affiliations
                [a ]Institute of Infection & Global Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
                [b ]Department of Global Health & Infection, Brighton & Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom
                [c ]Kwame Nkrumah University of Science & Technology, Kumasi, Ghana
                [d ]Institute of Global Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
                [e ]Department of Medicine, Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital, Kumasi, Ghana
                [f ]Centre for Clinical Infection, James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom
                [g ]Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of West Attica, Athens, Greece
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author at: Institute of Infection & Global Health, University of Liverpool, 8 West Derby Street, Liverpool L69 7BE, United Kingdom. a.m.geretti@ 123456liverpool.ac.uk
                Article
                S2589-5370(19)30236-6 100231
                10.1016/j.eclinm.2019.12.001
                6948257
                31922120
                d1f5a09e-84a3-44a8-8f4b-0ca94daadd65
                © 2019 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                : 22 October 2019
                : 27 November 2019
                : 2 December 2019
                Categories
                Research paper

                hiv,virological monitoring,point-of-care,adherence,resuppression,drug resistance

                Comments

                Comment on this article