9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      Call for Papers: Beyond Biology: The Crucial Role of Sex and Gender in Oncology

      Submit here before July 31, 2024

      About Oncology Research and Treatment: 2.4 Impact Factor I 3.3 CiteScore I 0.495 Scimago Journal & Country Rank (SJR)

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Macroscopic Borrmann Type as a Simple Prognostic Indicator in Patients with Advanced Gastric Cancer

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background: The purpose of this study was to clarify the clinical significance of macroscopic Borrmann type in advanced gastric cancer. Methods: From 1987 to 2001, we retrospectively studied the clinicopathological features and prognoses of 3,966 patients with advanced gastric cancer according to the macroscopic classification of Borrmann type. Results: Multivariate analysis showed that gender, Borrmann type and depth of invasion were all associated with the status of nodal involvement. There were statistically significant differences in overall survival among patients with Borrmann type I and II tumors, Borrmann type III tumors, and Borrmann type IV tumors according to depth of invasion (pT) and nodal involvement (pN), except in pN3 tumors. Borrmann type was an independent prognostic factor in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Furthermore, the 5-year survival rates of patients with Borrmann type III and type IV tumors after curative resection were 62.0 and 51.2%, respectively; this was significantly higher than after noncurative resection (17.8 and 18.0%, respectively). Conclusion: Macroscopic Borrmann type is a simple and valuable predictor for lymph node metastasis and survival in advanced gastric cancer patients.

          Related collections

          Most cited references11

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Impact of total lymph node count on staging and survival after gastrectomy for gastric cancer: data from a large US-population database.

          Prognosis of potentially curable (M0), completely resected gastric cancer is primarily determined by pathologic T and N staging criteria. The optimal regional dissection extent during gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma continues to be debated. A gastric cancer data set was created through structured queries to the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (1973 to 1999). Relationships between the number of lymph nodes (LNs) examined and survival were analyzed for the stage subgroups T1/2N0, T1/2N1, T3N0, and T3N1. In every stage subgroup, overall survival was highly dependent on the number of LNs examined. Multivariate prognostic variables in the T1/2N0M0 subgroup were number of LNs examined, age (for both, P < .0001), race (P = .0004), sex (P = .0006), and tumor size (P = .02). A linear trend for superior survival based on more LNs examined could be confirmed for all four stage subgroups. Baseline model-predicted 5-year survival with only one LN examined was 56% (T1/2N0), 35% (T1/2N1), 29% (T3N0), or 13% (T3N1). For every 10 extra LNs dissected, survival improved by 7.6% (T1/2N0), 5.7% (T1/2N1), 11% (T3N0), or 7% (T3N1). A cut-point analysis yielded the greatest survival difference at 10 LNs examined but continued to detect significantly superior survival differences for cut points at up to 40 LNs, always in favor of more LNs examined. Although the impact of stage migration versus improved regional disease control cannot be separated on basis of the available information, the data provide support in favor of extended lymphadenectomy during potentially curative gastrectomy for gastric cancer.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma – 2nd English Edition –

            (1998)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Pathology and prognosis of gastric carcinoma. Findings in 10,000 patients who underwent primary gastrectomy.

              Despite recent advances in diagnosis and treatment, gastric carcinoma remains a major cause of death in the world. The clinicopathologic profile of 10,000 consecutive patients who underwent primary gastrectomy during 1962-1989 were reviewed and prognostic factors influencing survival in those with gastric carcinoma were analyzed in 7031 patients. Incidence of gastrectomy for carcinoma has increased steadily and the rate of early carcinoma exceeded that of advanced carcinoma in the recent period of 1985-1989. Five-year and 10-year survival rates were 46.1% and 35.2% in 3868 patients with advanced carcinoma, and 88.8% and 77.3% in 3163 patients with early carcinoma, respectively. In patients with advanced carcinoma, significantly poorer survival rates were noticed for patients older than 70 years of age, those who underwent total gastrectomy, tumors involving the entire stomach or greater than 10 cm in diameter, a macroscopic diffusely infiltrative pattern, adenosquamous histologic type, positive surgical resection margins, or lymph node metastasis. None of the above poor prognostic features were identified in patients with early gastric carcinoma group except for those older than 70 years of age. Although lymph node metastases were present in 10% of early gastric carcinomas, this feature did not impart a poor prognosis. Patients with advanced carcinoma grossly resembling an early carcinoma had an intermediate prognosis, suggesting the existence of a developmentally midstage lesion between early and advanced carcinoma. The study illustrates that the most important role for clinicians treating with gastric carcinoma should be early detection and aggressive surgery for resectable tumors, followed by detailed pathologic examination.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                OCL
                Oncology
                10.1159/issn.0030-2414
                Oncology
                S. Karger AG
                0030-2414
                1423-0232
                2009
                September 2009
                03 September 2009
                : 77
                : 3-4
                : 197-204
                Affiliations
                aDepartment of Surgery and bCancer Metastasis Research Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; cDepartment of Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
                Article
                236018 Oncology 2009;77:197–204
                10.1159/000236018
                19729977
                d21711ab-2867-42a8-9df4-5619f97a65aa
                © 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel

                Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

                History
                : 10 December 2008
                : 18 May 2009
                Page count
                Figures: 4, Tables: 3, References: 21, Pages: 8
                Categories
                Clinical Study

                Oncology & Radiotherapy,Pathology,Surgery,Obstetrics & Gynecology,Pharmacology & Pharmaceutical medicine,Hematology
                Borrmann type,Advanced gastric cancer,Prognosis

                Comments

                Comment on this article